[Openstack-operators] Liberty and OVS Agent restarts

2016-02-10 Thread Clayton O'Neill
Summary: Liberty OVS agent restarts are better, but still need work. See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1514056 As many of you know, Liberty has a fix for OVS agent restarts such that it doesn’t dump all flows when starting, resulting in a loss of traffic. Unfortunately, Liberty

Re: [Openstack-operators] Anyone using Project Calico for tenant networking?

2016-02-10 Thread Ned Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX)
Thanks Neil, very helpful. From: neil.jer...@metaswitch.com Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Anyone using Project Calico for tenant networking? Hi Ned, Sorry for the delay in following up here. On 06/02/16 14:40, Ned Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX) wrote: > Thanks. Having read the

Re: [Openstack-operators] Liberty and OVS Agent restarts

2016-02-10 Thread Bajin, Joseph
Clayton, This is really good information. I’m wondering how we can help support you and get the necessary dev support to get this resolved sooner than later. I totally agree with you that this should be backported to at least Liberty. Please let me know how I and other can help! —Joe

Re: [Openstack-operators] Anyone using Project Calico for tenant networking?

2016-02-10 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: > In terms of how floating IPs are represented in the Neutron data model: > currently they require a relationship between an external Network, a > Router and a tenant Network. The floating IP pool is defined as a >

[Openstack-operators] [NFV][Telco] Telco Working Group Meeting for February 10th 2016 - CANCELLED

2016-02-10 Thread Steve Gordon
Hi all, Unfortunately today's meeting of the Telco Working Group [1] is canceled, my apologies for the late notice! Thanks, Steve [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list

Re: [Openstack-operators] Anyone using Project Calico for tenant networking?

2016-02-10 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi Ned, Sorry for the delay in following up here. On 06/02/16 14:40, Ned Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX) wrote: > Thanks. Having read the documentation, I have one question about the > network design. Basically, our use case specifies that instances be able > to have a stable IP across terminations;

Re: [Openstack-operators] DVR and public IP consumption

2016-02-10 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > Hi Carl, > sorry for the late reply, but these links of yours expanded to about 12 tabs > in my browser, most with serveral pages of text. "Given lots of thought" may > be an understatement. > > Both the specs sound very