[Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-Ansible] Liberty to Mitaka upgrade?

[Dale Baley]

Is there a document or guide for upgrading from Liberty to Mitaka yet?

thanks,
dale
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] [osops] OSOps Summit Etherpad is up!

[Joseph Bajin]

Operators,

The OSOPs Summit etherpad is up and running. You can find this etherpad
located here. [1]

For those that are not aware of OSOps, it stands for OpenStack Operators.
Currently, we maintain the operators focused github repositories as well as
working with other projects to help address the issues that operators are
experiencing. If there is anything that you think that the OSOps group
could help with, please add it to the etherpad so that we can capture it.

No idea is too small or too complex for us to handle.  Just putting down
your ideas will be a great help to atleast get others talking about them.

Thanks

Joe


[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/austin-ops-osops
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Pinning Guest vCPUs to Host pCPUs

[Steve Gordon]

- Original Message -
> From: "Benyatou Hamza" 
> To: OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I established a mapping between virtual CPU to the physical core following
> this Mirantis guide [1], I went through it successfully but the problem I
> have is that I am only able to launch one instance regardless of the the
> number of vCPUs specified in the Flavor (2,4,16.).
> 
> Have you implemented this option before ?

Hi Hamza,

Do you have debug logging from the scheduling attempt? Output from `virsh 
capabilities` might be of help too.

Thanks,

Steve

> Thank you
> 
> Hamza
> 
> https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-openstack-7-0-nfvi-deployment-guide-numacpu-pinning/

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] Pinning Guest vCPUs to Host pCPUs

[Benyatou Hamza]

Hi,

I established a mapping between virtual CPU to the physical core following
this Mirantis guide [1], I went through it successfully but the problem I
have is that I am only able to launch one instance regardless of the the
number of vCPUs specified in the Flavor (2,4,16.).

Have you implemented this option before ?

Thank you

Hamza

https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-openstack-7-0-nfvi-deployment-guide-numacpu-pinning/
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] [Telco][NFV][Austin Summit] Telco/NFV Ops Working Group Session

[Curtis]

Hi,

I've started to put together the etherpad [1] for the Telco/NFV Ops
Working Group Session [2] which is on Monday, April 25th from 4:40PM
to 6:10PM in MR-410.

If you can attend, please take a few minutes to fill out some ideas
and topics for discussion, as well as other thoughts on how we can
create concrete actions from the session. :)

Thanks, and looking forward to the session,
Curtis.

[1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AUS-ops-NFV-Telco
[2]: https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9522

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Configure cinder to allow volume delete when RBD snapshots present

[Forrest Flagg]

Eric,

Thanks for the reply and info about the changes coming to the RBD driver
for Newton.  Since the changes are slated to hit in Newton is there a plan
to backport?  This seems to me to be an important piece of being able to
use Ceph effectively for storage.  What have people been doing up to this
point for backup and disaster recovery?  Is there a current work around for
dealing with this limitation?  Thanks,

Forrest

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Eric Harney  wrote:

> On 04/11/2016 11:18 AM, Forrest Flagg wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I have a working Kilo cloud running with ceph for the storage backend.
> I'd like
> > to use RBD snapshots for backups because they're so fast, but cinder
> doesn't
> > allow volume deletion when an RBD snapshot exists.  I want to keep daily
> backups
> > in case a user terminates an instance and we need recover it or for
> disaster
> > recovery.  Is there a way to mark the volumes as deleted when a tenant
> deletes
> > them so they don't show up in OpenStack but still exist within ceph for
> backup
> > purposes?  Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Forrest Flagg
> > Cloud System Administrator
> > Advanced Computing Group
> > (207) 561-3575
> > raymond.fl...@maine.edu 
> >
>
> Hi Forrest,
>
> There is ongoing development for the RBD driver in Cinder which fixes
> this. This change [1] is currently slated to land in Newton.
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281550/
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
>


-- 
Forrest Flagg
Cloud System Administrator
Advanced Computing Group
(207) 561-3575
raymond.fl...@maine.edu
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

[Anna Kamyshnikova]

>I would definitely like to see how these results are effected by
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/ but understandably 49
>physical nodes are hard to come by.

Yes, I'm planning to check how situation will change with all recent fixes,
but I will be able to do this in May or later.

>About testing on scale it’s not so problematic because of the Cloud For
All project.
>Here [1] you can request for a multi node cluster which you can use to
>perform tests. Exact requirements are specified on that website.

[1] http://osic.org

Thanks for pointing this!

>It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
>scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?

Thanks! I have testing L3 HA + DVR in plans.

P. S.

I've updated environment description in report with some details.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Rossella Sblendido 
wrote:

>
>
> On 04/18/2016 04:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
> > Hi guys!
> >
> > As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
> > nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are
> > not able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful
> > enough. But it is really important to understand the issues that real
> > deployments have.
> >
> > Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49
> > nodes (3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran
> > shaker and rally tests and also performed some
> > manual destructive scenarios. I think that this is very important to
> > share these results. Ideally, I think that we should collect statistics
> > for different configurations each release to compare and check it to
> > make sure that we are heading the right way.
> >
> > The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in
> > google doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.
>
> It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
> scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?
>
> Rossella
>
> >
> > [1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
> > [2]
> > -
> https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ann Kamyshnikova
> > Mirantis, Inc
> >
> >
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Regards,
Ann Kamyshnikova
Mirantis, Inc
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder usage statistics

[M Ranga Swami Reddy]

yes, I could see both...like allocated and used...Are you looking for
used details?

Thanks
Swami

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Swarna, Mohan (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
 wrote:
> Hi Swami,
>
> Can we get the actual usage rather than the allocated Volumes.
>
> Regards,
> Mohan Swarna
>
> -Original Message-
> From: EXT M Ranga Swami Reddy [mailto:swamire...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 4:40 PM
> To: David Ocana 
> Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder usage statistics
>
> You can try below:
>
> cinder quota-defaults 
> cinder quota-show
> cinder quota-usage 
>
>
> Thanks
> Swami
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:17 PM, David Ocana  wrote:
>> Hi operators,
>>
>> I'm trying to come up with a yearly usage report for our tenants (mainly
>> cpu, ram and storage), and I just realized I can't find any information
>> about cinder usage.
>>
>> Is there any `nova usage` equivalent for cinder? I was googling a bit
>> before writing to the list, and I found this "cinder-volume-usage-audit"
>> script which is supposed to be run after changing some cinder.conf
>> settings, but not really sure to change this in our production environment.
>>
>> Can someone paste some output of the script? Any alternatives?
>>
>> Many thanks for your help.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder usage statistics

[Swarna, Mohan (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)]

Hi Swami,

Can we get the actual usage rather than the allocated Volumes.

Regards,
Mohan Swarna

-Original Message-
From: EXT M Ranga Swami Reddy [mailto:swamire...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 4:40 PM
To: David Ocana 
Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder usage statistics

You can try below:

cinder quota-defaults 
cinder quota-show
cinder quota-usage 


Thanks
Swami

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:17 PM, David Ocana  wrote:
> Hi operators,
>
> I'm trying to come up with a yearly usage report for our tenants (mainly
> cpu, ram and storage), and I just realized I can't find any information
> about cinder usage.
>
> Is there any `nova usage` equivalent for cinder? I was googling a bit
> before writing to the list, and I found this "cinder-volume-usage-audit"
> script which is supposed to be run after changing some cinder.conf
> settings, but not really sure to change this in our production environment.
>
> Can someone paste some output of the script? Any alternatives?
>
> Many thanks for your help.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators