Re: [Openstack-operators] Murano in Production

Hi Serg, Thank you for sharing this information :) If I'm understanding correctly, the main reason you're using a non-clustered / corosync setup is because that's how most other components in Mirantis OpenStack are configured? Is there anything to be aware of in how Murano communicates over the

Re: [Openstack-operators] Public cloud operators group in

Hi Matt, At considerable risk of heading down a rabbit hole... how are you defining "public" cloud for these purposes? Cheers, Blair Any cloud that provides a cloud to a thirdparty in exchange for money. So, rent a VM, rent a collection of vms, lease a fully operational cloud spec'ed to

Re: [Openstack-operators] Evacuate host with host ephemeral storage

Hi, double-check if "nova migrate" option will work for you - it uses a different mechanisms than live-migration and judging by [1] depending on the release of OpenStack you use it might work with LVM backed ephemeral storage. And I seccond Kostiantyn email - we seems to be mixing evacuation with

Re: [Openstack-operators] Evacuate host with host ephemeral storage

Thank you for the clarification. My digging around has thus far only revealed https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1499405 (live migration is not implemented for LVM backed storage) If any one has any more info on this subject it would be much appreciated. From:

Re: [Openstack-operators] Evacuate host with host ephemeral storage

Hi, here migration and evacuation are getting mixed up. In migration case you can access the ephemeral storage of your VM and thus you will copy that disk=that file (either as offline aka ‘cold’ migration or via live migration) In evacuation case your Compute Host is either unavailable (or

Re: [Openstack-operators] Murano in Production

Other that #1 that's exactly the same design we used for Trove. Glad to see someone else using it too for validation. Thanks. On Sep 22, 2016 11:39 PM, "Serg Melikyan" wrote: > Hi Joe, > > I can share some details on how murano is configured as part of the > default

Re: [Openstack-operators] Evacuate host with host ephemeral storage

No I have not, I guess there is nothing else to do than just give it a go :) Thanks for the pointer From: Marcin Iwinski Date: Friday 23 September 2016 at 11:39 To: David Orn Johannsson, "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" Subject: Re:

[Openstack-operators] [Massively Distributed] Working sessions in Barcelona.

Dear all The Massively Distributed Cloud Working Group [1] will meet on Thursday morning in the Barcelona Summit. We have three slots. The current proposal is to discuss distributed clouds/Fog/Edge use-cases and requirements during the two first ones and to use the last one to define concrete

Re: [Openstack-operators] Evacuate host with host ephemeral storage

On 23 Sep 2016 at 13:25:39, Davíð Örn Jóhannsson (davi...@siminn.is) wrote: OpenStack Liberty Ubuntu 14.04 I know that using block storage like Cinder you can evacuate instances from hosts, but in my case we are not yet using Cinder or other block storage solutions, we rely on local ephemeral

Re: [Openstack-operators] Murano in Production

Kris, if I understand correctly we use pacemaker/corosync to manage our cluster. When primary controller is detected as failed - pacemaker updates HAProxy configuration to point to the new primary controller. I don't know all details regarding HA Proxy and how HA is made in that case, I've added

Re: [Openstack-operators] Murano in Production

How are you having ha proxy pointing to the current primary controller? Is this done automatically or are you manually setting a server as the master? Sent from my iPad > On Sep 23, 2016, at 5:17 AM, Serg Melikyan wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > I can share some details on