[Openstack-operators] Boston Forum Schedule Online

2017-04-12 Thread Tom Fifield
Hello all, The schedule for our the Forum is online: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/#track=146 ==> Session moderators, please start advertising your sessions & starting pre-discussions, to get the best, most well-informed people there possible! ==> Anyone

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators] [nova] cloud.cfg not applied

2017-04-12 Thread Carlos Konstanski
Good idea. I just tried again with the "shebang". Didn't help. But I will be sure to include it in the future at all times. "Edmund Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)" writes: > Are you starting the file with "#cloud-config"? AFAIK, cloud-init uses > the first line to decide how

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators] [nova] cloud.cfg not applied

2017-04-12 Thread Edmund Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)
Are you starting the file with "#cloud-config"? AFAIK, cloud-init uses the first line to decide how to process the file (e.g. if it starts with a shell shebang it will treat it as a shell script, #cloud-config will cause it to process it as cloud-init YAML, and so forth). I am not sure if it

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators] [nova] cloud.cfg not applied

2017-04-12 Thread Carlos Konstanski
It does look funny at first. But that's actually two separate users. This cloud.cfg has been verified in an enterprise cloud. Apart from the passwd stuff (which I will remove) I am certain it should work. It specifies that the default user should be created as normal, and it adds a second

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators] [nova] cloud.cfg not applied

2017-04-12 Thread m foster
The only thing I can think of is that the default user should just be "default", not qualified with "name". Perhaps that is clobbering your next entry or just creating a syntax error. On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Carlos Konstanski < ckonstan...@pippiandcarlos.com> wrote: > I cannot get a

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators] [nova] cloud.cfg not applied

2017-04-12 Thread Carlos Konstanski
I cannot get a simple cloud.cfg to be applied to a newly created instance. This is the cloud.cfg: (sensitive info removed) users: - name: default - name: ckonstanski groups: sudo shell: /bin/bash sudo: ['ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL'] passwd: lock_passwd: False

Re: [Openstack-operators] LTS Dreaming ... [was] Help: Liberty installation guide (English).

2017-04-12 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 06:01:00PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: :Right, but the distros aren't interested in funding developers for LTS :upstream work, much less a lot of the stable branch support upstream. It :shouldn't be surprising why, that's where they can make money. No doubt that's their

[Openstack-operators] [scientific] Reminder: Scientific WG IRC meeting today at 0900 UTC

2017-04-12 Thread Stig Telfer
Hi all - We have a Scientific WG IRC meeting later today at 0900 UTC in channel #openstack-meeting. Everyone is welcome. The agenda[1] is a round-up of some of the Forum planning that has been going on in the last couple of weeks. We also have a round-up of the OpenStack angle at the HPC