Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Stein" release

2018-03-31 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
[Meta comment: corrected the email subject: "Solar" --> "Stein"]

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 04:26:43PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> The last version bump was in "Pike" release (commit: b980df0,
> 11-Feb-2017), and we didn't do any bump during "Queens".  So it's time
> to increment the versions (which will also makes us get rid of some
> backward compatibility cruft), and pick future versions of libvirt and
> QEMU.  
> 
> As it stands, during the "Pike" release the advertized NEXT_MIN versions  
>  
> were set to: libvirt 1.3.1 and QEMU 2.5.0 -- but they weren't actually
>  
> bumped for the "Queens" release.  So they will now be applied for the 
>  
> "Rocky" release.  (Hmm, but note that libvirt 1.3.1 was released more 
>  
> than 2 years ago[1].)  
> 
> While at it, we should also discuss about what will be the NEXT_MIN   
>  
> libvirt and QEMU versions for the "Solar" release.  To that end, I've 
>  
> spent going through different distributions and updated the   
>  
> DistroSupportMatrix Wiki[2].   
> 
> Taking the DistroSupportMatrix into picture, for the sake of discussion,
> how about the following NEXT_MIN versions for "Solar" release:
>  
> 
> (a) libvirt: 3.2.0 (released on 23-Feb-2017)   
> 
> This satisfies most distributions, but will affect Debian "Stretch",  
>  
> as they only have 3.0.0 in the stable branch -- I've checked their
> repositories[3][4].  Although the latest update for the stable
> release "Stretch (9.4)" was released only on 10-March-2018, I don't
> think they increment libvirt and QEMU versions in stable.  Is
> there another way for "Stretch (9.4)" users to get the relevant
> versions from elsewhere?   
> 
> (b) QEMU: 2.9.0 (released on 20-Apr-2017)  
> 
> This too satisfies most distributions but will affect Oracle Linux
> -- which seem to ship QEMU 1.5.3 (released in August 2013) with
> their "7", from the Wiki.  And will also affect Debian "Stretch" --
> as it only has 2.8.0
> 
> Can folks chime in here?
> 
> [1] 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-announce/2016-January/msg2.html
> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix
> [3] https://packages.qa.debian.org/libv/libvirt.html
> [4] https://packages.qa.debian.org/libv/libvirt.html
> 
> -- 
> /kashyap

-- 
/kashyap

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

2018-03-31 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 03:17:52PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:49:17AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote:

[...]

> > > Taking the DistroSupportMatrix into picture, for the sake of discussion,
> > > how about the following NEXT_MIN versions for "Solar" release:
> > >  
> > > 
> > Correction - for the "Stein" release. :)
> 
> Darn, I should've triple-checked before I assumed it is to be "Solar".
> If "Stein" is confirmed; I'll re-send this email with the correct
> release name for clarity.

It actually is:

http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-March/128899.html
-- All Hail our Newest Release Name - OpenStack Stein

(That email went into 'openstack-operators' maildir for me; my filtering
fault.)

I won't start another thread;, will just leave this existing thread
intact, as people will read it as: "whatever name the 'S' release ends
up with" (as 'fungi' put it on IRC).

[...]

-- 
/kashyap

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

2018-03-31 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:49:17AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > While at it, we should also discuss about what will be the NEXT_MIN 
> >
> > libvirt and QEMU versions for the "Solar" release.  To that end, I've   
> >
> > spent going through different distributions and updated the 
> >
> > DistroSupportMatrix Wiki[2].   
> > 
> > Taking the DistroSupportMatrix into picture, for the sake of discussion,
> > how about the following NEXT_MIN versions for "Solar" release:  
> >
> > 
> Correction - for the "Stein" release. :)

Darn, I should've triple-checked before I assumed it is to be "Solar".
If "Stein" is confirmed; I'll re-send this email with the correct
release name for clarity.

Thanks for correcting.

-- 
/kashyap

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators