Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

idcycle that has already been planned. Perhaps the > folks that planned this one can weigh in. > > ___ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > -- M

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, > proprietary and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in erro

[Openstack-operators] European Operators

Hi All Don't know how many European folks are on this list, but just wondering if there's any interest in a European Operators meet up ? Matt -- Matt Jarvis Head of Cloud Computing DataCentred Office: (+44)0161 8703985 Mobile: (+44)07983 725372 Email: matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk Website

Re: [Openstack-operators] European Operators

t; > > > PhD, Scientific Computing > > Researcher, IT Department, > > Uppsala University. > > Cloud Application Expert, > > UPPMAX. > > Visiting Researcher, > > Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP). > > salman.t...

Re: [Openstack-operators] European Operators

requirements, > so I'd be very happy to be there. > > Neil > > > > On 17/09/15 13:17, Matt Jarvis wrote: > > I'm thinking we'll let this thread run for a day or so and hopefully > gather a few more interested parties, then take the conversation off-list > an

Re: [Openstack-operators] European Operators

gt; > Thanks! > VW > > From: Tim Bell <tim.b...@cern.ch> > Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 11:05 AM > To: Matt Jarvis <matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk>, Neil Jerram < > neil.jer...@metaswitch.com> > Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"

Re: [Openstack-operators] European Operators

N PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > +1 > I'm also interested. > > > > On 17.09.2015 09:52, Matt Jarvis wrote: > > Hi All > > > > Don't know how many European folks are on this list, but just > wondering if there's any interest in a European Op

Re: [Openstack-operators] European Operators

ter to be named around organising ops events in > general, rather than along geographical lines. > > > Regards, > > > Tom > > > On 18/09/15 15:43, Matt Jarvis wrote: > >> So judging from the responses so far, I'd say there is an appetite for >> doing this. There

[Openstack-operators] [eu] European Operators Meetup

OK, let's try this with tags. I've created an initial etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/european-ops-meetup-planning to start to gather some information. This is a first pass and obviously not definitive, so feel free to add sections or suggestions. -- Matt Jarvis Head of Cloud Computing

Re: [Openstack-operators] European Operators

Stack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > -- Matt Jarvis Head of Cloud Computing DataCentred Office: (+44)0161 8703985 Mobile: (+44)07983 725372 Email: matt.jar...@datacentre

Re: [Openstack-operators] Router associated with multiple l3 agents

in the database. On 25 November 2015 at 00:21, Assaf Muller <amul...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Matt Jarvis > <matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk> wrote: > > Nope, the HA flag is definitely set to false. Here's another example : > > > > root@osn

Re: [Openstack-operators] Router associated with multiple l3 agents

9a6c-4c6d-9d6d-049b3dee7f6f' > is the 'HA' flag set to True? Otherwise, this is a really weird bug > which I've never seen before. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Matt Jarvis > <matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi All > > > > In the last week or so we'v

[Openstack-operators] Router associated with multiple l3 agents

this behaviour before ? We are running Juno BTW. Matt -- Matt Jarvis Head of Cloud Computing DataCentred Office: (+44)0161 8703985 Mobile: (+44)07983 725372 Email: matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk Website: http://www.datacentred.co.uk -- DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

learnt something along the way. On 17 November 2015 at 20:16, JJ Asghar <j...@chef.io> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 11/17/15 1:34 PM, Matt Jarvis wrote: > > From my perspective we're happy to put in place anything that

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team - Next Meeting Coordinates and News

enda > >> > >> > >>==August Meetup== > >>Since there really isn't a lot of time left and we have proposals > >>already, we decided for this time we would not do the open call. > >>So, gfa, shintano and I will be working behind th

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup event sizes

+1 On 1 June 2016 at 16:54, Edgar Magana wrote: > I totally second Thierry. That was an excellent description of the > importance of having the Ops sessions in these events. > > Cheers, > > Edgar > > On 6/1/16, 2:49 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup event sizes

Great feedback Anita - thank you :) On 1 June 2016 at 20:42, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: > On 06/01/2016 03:29 PM, David Medberry wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Matt Jarvis < > matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk> > > wrote: >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Shared Storage for compute nodes

If you look at the user survey ( https://www.openstack.org/user-survey/survey-2016-q1/landing ) you can see what the current landscape looks like in terms of deployments. Ceph is by far the most commonly used storage backend for Cinder. On 21 June 2016 at 08:27, Michael Stang

Re: [Openstack-operators] Operators Meetup Manchester - sessions schedule available?

nstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > -- Matt Jarvis Head of Cloud Computing DataCentred Office: (+44)0161 8703985 Mobile: (+44)07983 725372 Email: matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk Website: http://www.datacentred.co.uk -- DataCentred Limi

Re: [Openstack-operators] Operators Meetup Manchester - sessions schedule available?

Edgar > > From: Matt Jarvis <matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk> > Date: Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:43 AM > To: Belmiro Moreira <moreira.belmiro.email.li...@gmail.com> > Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" < > openstack-operators@lists.openstack.

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for MAN Ops Meetup (Feb 15, 16)

WG Large Deployment Team > 15:00 - 15:30 Coffee > > 15:30 - 16:00 Breakout Reports > > 16:00 - 17:00 Feedback Session > > > > > > There will be a followup email shortly regarding moderators for the > sessions - thanks to those who volunteered so far! > > > Reg

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for MAN Ops Meetup (Feb 15, 16)

Thanks Shamail ! On 1 February 2016 at 09:39, Shamail Tahir <itzsham...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Matt! > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Matt Jarvis <matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk > > wrote: > >> That's a very good point ! >> >> OK, so the

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for MAN Ops Meetup (Feb 15, 16)

<itzsham...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Matt Jarvis <matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk > > wrote: > >> Hello All >> >> The event in Manchester is rapidly approaching, and we're still looking >> for modera

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Do you, or your users, have input on how get-me-a-network should work in Nova?

On our public cloud we do exactly as Robert describes - as part of our customer onboarding process, we automatically create a default network and router to our provider network, so that a tenant can just spin up a VM if they want to. Obviously the customer can then delete this if they wish, but it

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Do you, or your users, have input on how get-me-a-network should work in Nova?

and router ? On 26 February 2016 at 11:36, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2016-02-26 11:21:47 + (+0000), Matt Jarvis wrote: > > From a public cloud perspective I'm not convinced that an opt-out > argument > > is the right way to go. A router in our cont

[Openstack-operators] European Operators Meetup

I just wanted to say a huge thank you to everyone who attended, moderated and sponsored the European Ops Meetup. We had a fantastic two days in Manchester, made a lot of new friends and had some incredibly useful discussions. Our goals when we put the event together were to engage European

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for MAN Ops Meetup (Feb 15, 16)

Thanks Carol ! On 1 February 2016 at 16:46, Barrett, Carol L <carol.l.barr...@intel.com> wrote: > I can help with the writing User Stories session. > > Thanks > > > > *From:* Matt Jarvis [mailto:matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk] > *Sent:* Monday, February 01, 2016

[Openstack-operators] Cloud gateway products

Has anyone got any real world experience with on-premise cloud gateway products that will backend into Ceph ie. Swift or S3 compatible ? Ctera and Panzura's products look like they do .. we're ideally looking for something with a fairly rich feature set on the client side - CIFS/NFS, intelligent

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for AUS Ops@Summit

I could also potentially help with the Ceph session. On 8 April 2016 at 19:07, Edgar Magana wrote: > Hello Tom, > > I can have one of Workday’s Ceph experts that are going to be attending > the meeting to volunteer for the Ceph one, so count on it. > > Edgar > > From:

Re: [Openstack-operators] Horizon bug fixed in Liberty, how should we ask a backport to Kilo ?

This thread is a great example of the value of the midcycle meetups :) On 4 March 2016 at 08:09, Saverio Proto wrote: > Thanks for merging the patch so quickly ! I will try today to build > new ubuntu packages and and for feedback at UCA. > > > But yes, thank you for

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-community] Recognising Ops contributions

Isn't this more nuanced than simply 'upstream' and 'downstream' ? Characterising downstream as "people who help others using OpenStack, by moderating Ops meetups, by filing bugs, by answering questions on Ask, by contributing a blogpost, etc...". is an extremely broad church. My assumption about

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-community] Recognising Ops contributions

+1 for TOC or AOC On 3 March 2016 at 15:54, Edgar Magana wrote: > Hello Folks, > > I have to admit that I really like these two: > > TOC / Technical Ops Contributor > IRO / I Run OpenStack > > Edgar > > From: Pierre Freund > Date: Thursday,

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] OpenStack Contributor Awards

+1 for custom T-shirts or hoodies. Actual medals/trophies would also be a nice idea ;) On 1 March 2016 at 15:30, Tom Fifield wrote: > Excellent, excellent. > > What's the best place to buy Raspberry Pis these days? > > On 22/02/16 21:09, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz wrote: >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Announcing the Non-ATC Recognition Working Group

Hi Shamail I'd be happy to volunteer to help with this working group. Matt On 28 March 2016 at 20:33, Shamail Tahir wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We had some great discussion on the mailing lists on how to recognize > operators and other contributors in the OpenStack

Re: [Openstack-operators] VPNaaS and FWaaS

19 AM, Melvin Hillsman <mrhills...@gmail.com mrhills...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Please take a moment to reach out to the Neutron team and visit the > following. Could this resource be of use to address their concern? > https://osic.org/clusters > > On Apr 29,

[Openstack-operators] Debug logging

One of the discussion points which came up in the Logging session at the Ops Summit today was that a lot of operators are running with debug logging enabled. There was a request from development to understand more about why that might be needed, ie. under what circumstances are operators not

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team - Inagural meeting - Tuesday 1400 UTC

Sounds lovely, but could be tricky with multiple tracks and ~150 attendees. If you have two sessions scheduled at the same time that have more than 30 people wanting to get into both for example ... On 20 May 2016 at 15:24, Melvin Hillsman wrote: > +1 > > > On May 19,

Re: [Openstack-operators] Meeting summary, minutes, definition of 'users'

h > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Matt Jarvis < > matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk> wrote: > >> Hi Chris >> >> Good round up and a good start on the definition. Don't forget the public >> cloud operators though, it's not all about private cloud

Re: [Openstack-operators] Meeting summary, minutes, definition of 'users'

Hi Chris Good round up and a good start on the definition. Don't forget the public cloud operators though, it's not all about private cloud ;) On 17 May 2016 at 16:51, Chris Morgan wrote: > I'm new to this, but here goes: > > Meeting held on IRC today at 14:00 UTC to

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Ironic Summit recap - ops experiences

Very familiar list Tim, and we end up working around a lot of them with horrible hardware specific code. Our bugbears also include : Required configuration only being available via a web interface - eg. setting hostname of the BMC on Supermicro hardware IPMI hanging and requiring complete removal

Re: [Openstack-operators] VPNaaS and FWaaS

Thanks for the clarification Kyle. On 2 May 2016 at 14:33, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Matt Jarvis > <matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk> wrote: > > As some of you on this list may already know, there are issues in the > >

Re: [Openstack-operators] VPNaaS and FWaaS

We see FWaaS generally being used by customers with larger deployments, where they want overall firewall rules at the boundary as well as security groups. Since my original post on this thread, I went to look at the numbers - it's actually being used more widely than I originally thought on our

[Openstack-operators] User Committee elections

Hi All I'm very pleased to announce the results of the first User Committee elections, which closed at 21.59UTC on the 17th February 2017. The two candidates elected to the User Committee are Melvin Hillsman and Shamail Tahir. Congratulations to Melvin and Shamail, I know they will both do an

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] User Committee Election

t;> > >>> > >>> Yih Leong Sun > >>> > >>> Maish Saidel-Keesing > >>> > >>> Christopher Adeo > >>> > >>> Shamail Tahir > >>> > >>>

Re: [Openstack-operators] What would you like in Pike?

I think one of the problems we're seeing now is that a lot of operators have actually already scratched some of these missing functionality itches like quota management and project nesting by handling those scenarios in external management systems. I know we certainly did at DataCentred. That

Re: [Openstack-operators] OsOps Reboot

Great stuff Melvin ! Look forward to seeing this move forward. On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Melvin Hillsman wrote: > Good day everyone, > > As operators we would like to reboot the efforts started around OsOps. > Initial things that may make sense to work towards are

Re: [Openstack-operators] Converged infrastructure

sh array and see how it works too. > > If you have some very large flash array, you may wanna consider single > socket. You can watch this video where they run DBs etc., on pure > flash arrays and give some advice > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqlC7S3cUKs . thx will > > On

Re: [Openstack-operators] Converged infrastructure

Hi Mohammed Could you give us an idea of what your node hardware looks like, and how you split it up ? I'm doing some work on the economics of this, so I'd like to understand the RAM and physical cores split. On 1 September 2016 at 17:58, Mohammed Naser wrote: > I proposed

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible work load test for interop patch set

I was going to review this, but it got merged before I got to it. There's a couple of fundamental issues with these scripts, the lack of error handling being one, but more importantly using the existence of apt or yum to check for OS version is not safe as either can exist on either platform. I'll

Re: [Openstack-operators] python and nice utf ö ü :)

What was your problem to start with ? On 31 August 2016 at 12:56, Saverio Proto wrote: > Hello ops, > > this patch fixed my problem: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/361308/ > > but it is an ugly hack according to: > >

Re: [Openstack-operators] python and nice utf ö ü :)

; Adding this two lines: > > reload(sys) > > sys.setdefaultencoding("utf-8") > > > > fixes the problem, I dont have anymore the exception > > UnicodeEncodeError and I see printed: > > > > Server: نواع-پاستاها-و-طرز-ط [3f26242c-440b-4a2e-b3ca

[Openstack-operators] Public cloud operators group in Barcelona

Given there are quite a few public cloud operators in Europe now, is there any interest in a public cloud group meeting as part of the ops meetup in Barcelona ? I already know many of you, but I think it could be very useful to share our experiences with a wider group. -- DataCentred Limited

[Openstack-operators] Volunteers needed for help with Barcelona ops meetups ( and beyond )

Hello all We're a bit thin on the ground in the ops meetup team, and could really do with some more volunteers to help with the work of organising the Summit and Midcycle Ops Meetups. No previous experience required, enthusiasm and some time is all that's needed ! We're meeting regularly on

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Seeking users of Infiniband

Hey Stig Have you spoken to the guys at OCF in Sheffield ? Not sure if they do, but they might, although not sure if any of them lurk on this list. Matt On 17 August 2016 at 09:36, Stig Telfer wrote: > Thanks Blair, > > To clarify I’m interested in IB rather than

Re: [Openstack-operators] Public cloud operators group in Barcelona

terest in the lifecycle > management of customer infrastructure, whereas for Science Clouds turning > things off and cleaning up data is a policy issue that does not appear to > have resulted in any common tooling yet. > > Cheers, > Blair > > On 22 Sep 2016 6:35 PM, "Matt Jar

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team - Meeting Reminder

I'm back in the game so will be able to make that. On 4 Nov 2016 18:33, "Chris Morgan" wrote: Hello All, When we met last week in Barcelona (some of us) I think there was consensus around picking up our normal Tuesday IRC meetings as of next Tuesday, which I see now is

[Openstack-operators] [ops-meetups] Weekly meeting reminder

Just a reminder our regular weekly meeting will be at 1400 UTC in #openstack-operators. If you want to get involved in organising the Ops MidCycles, join us there ! Also a final reminder that if you want to vote on the location for the next MidCycle, the doodle poll will close today so get voting

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

standards around naming of objects, network creation patterns and a bunch of other stuff which I think this WG can start to address. Matt On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Stefano Maffulli <stef...@openstack.org> wrote: > Hello folks, > > On 11/15/2016 02:43 AM, matt Jarvis wrot

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

! On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:55 AM, matt Jarvis <m...@mattjarvis.org.uk> wrote: > Whoops, just realised I can't send to these lists with multiple additional > recipients, so sending again separately .. > > Thank you for all of your interest in this proposal. In order to move > thi

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

ndation). > > Best, Flanders > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Stefano Maffulli <stef...@openstack.org> > wrote: > >> Hello folks, >> >> On 11/15/2016 02:43 AM, matt Jarvis wrote: >> > I'd like to propose that, in line with the n

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg] First meeting Wednesday 7th December 1400 UTC #openstack-meeting-3

As per the results of the recent Doodle poll, the first meeting of the Public Cloud Working Group will be held on Wednesday 7th December at 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3, and bi-weekly after that. If you're unfamiliar with IRC meetings, you can find some documentation on getting started at

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

rts, and > 3.) help jointly advertise and make the wider OpenStack *choice* of the > marketplace known to the world world. > > Looking forward to hearing other ideas and building on the above for 2017. > > Kind Regards, > > David F. Flanders > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at

[Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd very much like to try and put together a public cloud working group, with the very high level goal of representing the interests of the public cloud provider community around the globe. I'd like to propose that, in line with

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

/be43ysxhg5iq3uha On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:43 AM, matt Jarvis <m...@mattjarvis.org.uk> wrote: > So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd very > much like to try and put together a public cloud working group, with the > very high level goal

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] [publicClouds-wg] Reminder: Public Cloud WG meeting Wednesday 1400UTC

can haz feedback? ;-) > > I'm really excited to see who emerges as leaders of this WG, hopefully > several people will put forward nominations for the co-chair positions. > Regardless, I'm excited to support and help what the community decides - > even if it is from the other side of the wo

Re: [Openstack-operators] operators meetups team meetings

+1 from me for 1500 UTC, or other time later or earlier :) On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Chris Morgan wrote: > Today's meeting was held at 14:00 UTC, minutes here > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetups_team/201 > 6/ops_meetups_team.2016-12-06-14.25.html > >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Any serious stability and performance issues on RBD as ephemeral storage ?

I'd say using Ceph for ephemeral disks is the most common deployment pattern, at DataCentred we've been using it for years. It's rock solid and has been for several releases. There were some edge case issues around resizing and snapshotting, but I think that's all been fixed in the last couple of

[Openstack-operators] [ops-meetups] Reminder meeting today at 1500 UTC

Hi All Just a reminder that todays meeting has been moved to 1500 UTC, in openstack-operators as usual. Matt ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] UC Bylaws Changes - Approved!

Awesome work - well done Edgar and team ! On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: > Team, > > > > I am gladly informing you that the BoD has just approved our proposal to > change the OpenStack Bylaws: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QmLOeseAkjBWM_

[Openstack-operators] [User-committee][publicClouds-wg] Reminder: Public Cloud WG meeting Wednesday 1400UTC

Hi All We have the first Public Cloud WG IRC meeting on Wednesday at 1400 UTC on channel #openstack-meeting-3 The agenda is available here[1] We'd welcome as much input as possible, please feel free to make notes on the etherpad[1]. This first meeting will look to define our constituency,

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg] Doodle poll closed for chair elections

Hello All I've just closed the poll to elect the chairs for the Public Cloud working group. The results can be found at http://doodle.com/poll/s63r5s4ghyucmnqu Given the votes cast, and our desire for wide representation, I'd like to propose 3 co-chairs for this group : - Matt Jarvis

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder - IRC meeting Wednesday 4th January 1400 UTC

Hello All This is a reminder that the second meeting of the public cloud working group will be held tomorrow ( Wednesday 4th January ) at 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3. Draft agenda is on the etherpad at https://etherpad.openstack. org/p/publiccloud-wg, please feel free to add/comment. The

[Openstack-operators] [ops-meetup-team] Reminder - Ops Meetup Team weekly IRC meeting today 1500UTC

Hi All Just a reminder, our weekly IRC meeting is today at 1500UTC in #openstack-operators. We're now full steam ahead in the organising process for the next Ops MidCycle in Milan in March, so if you want to get involved then come along ! https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team You can

[Openstack-operators] [ops-meetup-team] Reminder - Ops Meetup Team weekly IRC meeting today 1500UTC

Hi All Just a reminder, our weekly IRC meeting is today at 1500UTC in #openstack-operators. We're now full steam ahead in the organising process for the next Ops MidCycle in Milan in March, so if you want to get involved then come along ! https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team You can

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder - IRC meeting Wednesday 21st December 1400UTC

Just a reminder, in case it wasn't clear enough above - for the Doodle poll to vote for chairs, please select TWO yes options as we need to elect two chairs. Thanks Matt On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Matt Jarvis <m...@mattjarvis.org.uk> wrote: > Hello All > > Thi

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder - IRC meeting Wednesday 21st December 1400UTC

Hello All This is a reminder that the second meeting of the public cloud working group will be held tomorrow ( Wednesday 21st December ) at 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3. Draft agenda is on the etherpad at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg, please feel free to add/comment. The

Re: [Openstack-operators] Operators Mid-cycle Moderator

I am definitely coming, and will moderate anywhere we need. I'm particularly interested in monitoring, lifecycle mgmt and ceph but happy to help anywhere. On 25 Feb 2017 18:36, "Melvin Hillsman" wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Thank you all for signing up to be moderators at