Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators]disable snat for router gateway

2016-01-19 Thread Aaron Segura
did you solve the proxy arp reply problem when you implemented the > snat disabled router and without assigning a floating ip? > > Thanks, > Akshay > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Aaron Segura <aaron.seg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It's possible. We do it all th

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators]disable snat for router gateway

2016-01-19 Thread Aaron Segura
t; Akshay > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Mike Spreitzer <mspre...@us.ibm.com> > wrote: > >> Aaron Segura <aaron.seg...@gmail.com> wrote on 01/16/2016 12:19:53 PM: >> >> > You shouldn't have to do anything other than disable SNAT and

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators]disable snat for router gateway

2016-01-16 Thread Aaron Segura
That is correct. You should be able to disable snat, then route the tenant network to the outside of the neutron router and communicate with your instances using their assigned fixed IP. If your outbound packets aren't leaving your router, you have another problem. Start checking iptables rules

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators]disable snat for router gateway

2016-01-16 Thread Aaron Segura
ang...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Aaron, > Do i need to add something in the iptables ? The setup is working fine > with floating ip and snat enabled router. > > Thanks, > Akshay > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Aaron Segura <aaron.seg...@gmail.com> > wrote: &g