Re: [Openstack-operators] [octavia][rocky] Octavia and VxLAN without DVR

would have nothing to bind to. > > -- > *From:* Erik McCormick > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2018 6:18 PM > *To:* Engelmann Florian > *Cc:* openstack-operators > *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] [octavia][rocky] Octavia and VxLAN > without

Re: [Openstack-operators] [octavia][rocky] Octavia and VxLAN without DVR

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 12:02 PM Florian Engelmann < florian.engelm...@everyware.ch> wrote: > Am 10/24/18 um 2:08 PM schrieb Erik McCormick: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 3:14 AM Florian Engelmann > > mailto:florian.engelm...@everyware.ch>> > > &

Re: [Openstack-operators] [octavia][rocky] Octavia and VxLAN without DVR

c routes. The route on the other connection won't interfere with it as it lives in a namespace. > > Am 10/23/18 um 6:57 PM schrieb Erik McCormick: > > So in your other email you said asked if there was a guide for > > deploying it with Kolla ansible... > > > > Oh boy. N

Re: [Openstack-operators] [octavia][rocky] Octavia and VxLAN without DVR

. It passes gate though, so I aasume it must work? I dunno. Networking comments and a really messy kolla-ansible / octavia how-to below... On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:09 AM Florian Engelmann wrote: > > Am 10/23/18 um 3:20 PM schrieb Erik McCormick: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:53 AM Flori

Re: [Openstack-operators] [octavia][rocky] Octavia and VxLAN without DVR

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:53 AM Florian Engelmann wrote: > > Hi, > > We did test Octavia with Pike (DVR deployment) and everything was > working right our of the box. We changed our underlay network to a > Layer3 spine-leaf network now and did not deploy DVR as we don't wanted > to have that much

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Octavia] [Kolla] SSL errors polling amphorae and missing tenant network interface

Oops, dropped Operators. Can't wait until it's all one list... On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:44 AM Erik McCormick wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 4:23 AM Tobias Urdin wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I've been having a lot of issues with SSL certificates myself, on

[Openstack-operators] [Octavia] SSL errors polling amphorae and missing tenant network interface

I've been wrestling with getting Octavia up and running and have become stuck on two issues. I'm hoping someone has run into these before. My google foo has come up empty. Issue 1: When the Octavia controller tries to poll the amphora instance, it tries repeatedly and eventually fails. The error

[Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups - Call for Hosts

Hello all, The Ops Meetup team has embarked on a mission to revive the traditional Operators Meetup that have historically been held between Summits. With the upcoming merger of the PTG into the Summit week, and the merger of most Ops discussion sessions at Summits into the Forum, we felt that we

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [SIGS] Ops Tools SIG

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:19 AM Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > > Hi, > > Matthias and I talked this morning about this topic, and we came to > realize > that there's room for/would be beneficial to have a common place for: > > a) Documentation about second day operator tools which can be >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Best kernel options for openvswitch on network nodes on a large setup

Ate you getting any particular log messages that lead you to conclude your issue lies with OVS? I've hit lots of kernel limits under those conditions before OVS itself ever noticed. Anything in dmesg, journal or neutron logs of interest? On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 7:27 PM Jean-Philippe Méthot <

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Forum Session Brainstorming

This is a friendly reminder for anyone wishing to see Ops-focused sessions in Berlin to get your submissions in soon. We have a couple things there that came out of the PTG, but that's it so far. See below for details. Cheers, Erik On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 5:07 PM Erik McCormick wrote: > He

[Openstack-operators] Ops Forum Session Brainstorming

Hello everyone, I have set up an etherpad to collect Ops related session ideas for the Forum at the Berlin Summit. Please suggest any topics that you would like to see covered, and +1 existing topics you like. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-forum-stein Cheers, Erik

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova][placement][upgrade][qa] Some upgrade-specific news on extraction

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 8:40 PM Rochelle Grober wrote: > Sounds like an important discussion to have with the operators in Denver. > Should put this on the schedule for the Ops meetup. > > --Rocky > We are planning to attend the upgrade sessions on Monday as a group. How about we put it there?

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup Agenda Planning - Denver Edition

a dedicated space at the PTG. You are welcome and > > It's 10th - 11th (Monday and Tuesday) in case someone is planning their > travel :) > > Cheers. > Shintaro > > On 2018/08/22 0:40, Erik McCormick wrote: > > Hello Ops, > > > > As you are hopefully awar

[Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup Agenda Planning - Denver Edition

Hello Ops, As you are hopefully aware, the Ops meetup, now integrated as part of the Project Team Gathering (PTG) is rapidly approaching. We are a bit behind on session planning, and we need your help to create an agenda. Please insert your session ideas into this etherpad, add subtopics to

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Survey Results!

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 8:59 AM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Chris Morgan's message of 2018-07-03 07:20:42 -0400: > > Question 1. "Are you considering attending the OpenStack Project > Technical > > Gathering (PTG) in Denver in September?" > > > > 83.33% yes > > 16.67% no > > > > (24

Re: [Openstack-operators] Proposing no Ops Meetups team meeting this week

On Tue, May 29, 2018, 7:15 AM Chris Morgan wrote: > Some of us will be only just returning to work today after being away all > week last week for the (successful) OpenStack Summit, therefore I propose > we skip having a meeting today but regroup next week? > +1 > Chris > > -- > Chris Morgan

Re: [Openstack-operators] Multiple Ceph pools for Nova?

Do you have enough hypervisors you can dedicate some to each purpose? You could make two availability zones each with a different backend. On Mon, May 21, 2018, 11:52 AM Smith, Eric wrote: > I have 2 Ceph pools, one backed by SSDs and one backed by spinning disks >

[Openstack-operators] Fast Forward Upgrades (FFU) Forum Sessions

Hello all, There are two forum sessions in Vancouver covering Fast Forward Upgrades. Session 1 (Current State): Wednesday May 23rd, 09:00 - 09:40, Room 220 Session 2 (Future Work): Wednesday May 23rd, 09:50 - 10:30, Room 220 The combined etherpad for both sessions can be found at:

Re: [Openstack-operators] Help finding old (Mitaka) RDO RPMs

Thanks! You're my heroes :) On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Amy Marrich <a...@demarco.com> wrote: > Erik, > > Here's the Mitaka archive:) > > http://vault.centos.org/7.3.1611/cloud/x86_64/openstack-mitaka/ > > Amy (spotz) > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at

[Openstack-operators] Help finding old (Mitaka) RDO RPMs

Hi All, Does anyone happen to have an archive of the MItaka RDO repo lying around they'd be willing to share with a poor unfortunate soul? My clone of it has gone AWOL and I have moderately desperate need of it. Thanks! Cheers, Erik ___

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Session Proposals for Vancouver Forum

nough time in SYD. I'm just not sure how to structure it or break it down. > Thanks, > -Jon > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:07:34AM -0400, Erik McCormick wrote: > :Greetings Ops, > : > :We are rapidly approaching the deadline for Forum session proposals > :(This coming S

[Openstack-operators] Ops Session Proposals for Vancouver Forum

Greetings Ops, We are rapidly approaching the deadline for Forum session proposals (This coming Sunday, 4/15) and we have been rather lax in getting the process started from our side. I've created an etherpad here for everyone to put up session ideas.

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup, Co-Location options, and User Feedback

I'm a +1 too as long as the devs at large are cool with it and won't hate on us for crashing their party. I also +1 the proposed format. It's basically what we're discussed in Tokyo. Make it so. Cheers Erik PS. Sorry for the radio silence the past couple weeks. Vacation, kids, etc. On Apr 2,

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] HA Guide, no Ubuntu instructions for HA Identity

does it very well. > ____ > From: Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> > Sent: 3/16/18 5:22 PM > To: torin.wolt...@granddial.com > Subject: Re: [Openstack] HA Guide, no Ubuntu instructions for HA Identity > There's no good reason to do any of that pacemaker stuff. Just stic

[Openstack-operators] Tokyo Ops Meetup - Call for Moderators - Last Call for Topics

Hello all, TL;DR - Those going to the Tokyo Ops meetup, please go volunteer to moderate sessions and offer any last minute topic ideas at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TYO-ops-meetup-2018 - The spring Ops meetup in Tokyo is rapidly approaching. Details on the event can be found here:

Re: [Openstack-operators] Is there an Ops Meetup today?

It was moved to 10am EST die to lots of conflicts. Need to update the wiki. On Feb 6, 2018 9:11 AM, "Jimmy McArthur" wrote: > Was it canceled? > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team > > ___ > OpenStack-operators

[Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team meeting minutes and next meeting

Planning for the Spring Ops Meetup in Tokyo (March 6 and 7) continues to come together nicely. If you plan to join us, please go sign up at: https://goo.gl/HBJkPy Also, please help us to fill out the agenda by suggesting topics or adding a +1 to the ones you like at:

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: > Folks, > > This discussion and the people interested in it seem like a perfect > application of the SIG process. By turning LTS into a SIG, everyone can > discuss the issues on the SIG mailing list and the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:44 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > > > On 14 Nov 2017, at 15:18, Mathieu Gagné wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: >>> The pressure for #2 comes from the inability to skip upgrades and the fact >>> that upgrades

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: > Hi all - please note this conversation has been split variously across > -dev and -operators. > > One small observation from the discussion so far is that it seems as > though there are two issues being

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On Nov 8, 2017 1:52 PM, "James E. Blair" <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote: Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> writes: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:45 PM, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote: >> Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:45 PM, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote: > Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> writes: > >> The concept, in general, is to create a new set of cores from these >> groups, and use 3rd party CI to validate patches. There are l

[Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

Hello Ops folks, This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and very productive session about how to go about keeping a selection of past releases available and maintained for a longer period of time (LTS). There was agreement in the room that this could be accomplished by

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [skip-level-upgrades][fast-forward-upgrades] PTG summary

to use as a starting point. Thanks to everyone for participating! Cheers, Erik On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:25 PM, <arkady.kanev...@dell.com> wrote: > See you there Eric. > > > > From: Erik McCormick [mailto:emccorm...@cirrusseven.com] > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 10:58

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [skip-level-upgrades][fast-forward-upgrades] PTG summary

On Oct 30, 2017 11:53 AM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: On 9/20/2017 9:42 AM, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: > Lee, > I can chair meeting in Sydney. > Thanks, > Arkady > Arkady, Are you actually moderating the forum session in Sydney because the session says Eric McCormick is

Re: [Openstack-operators] It's time...

Tom, Thank you for all you've done herding cats around here. We wouldn't be where we are today without you. We better find a very large pub in Sydney. See you there! All the best on your future sunbathing endeavors :) Cheers, Erik On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tom Fifield

Re: [Openstack-operators] [magnum] issue using magnum on Pike

The current release of Magnum is 5.0.1. You seem to be running a later dev release. Perhaps sine regression got introduced in that build? -Erik On Sep 29, 2017 8:59 AM, "Andy Wojnarek" wrote: So I started a fresh install of Pike on OpenSuSE in my test lab at

[Openstack-operators] Ceph Session at the Forum

Hey Ops folks, A Ceph session was put on the discussion Etherpad for the forum, and I know a lot of folks have expressed interest in doing one, especially since there's no Ceph Day going on this time around. I need a volunteer to run the session and set up an agenda. If you're willing and able

Re: [Openstack-operators] [tc][nova][ironic][mogan] Evaluate Mogan project

My main question here would be this: If you feel there are deficiencies in Ironic, why not contribute to improving Ironic rather than spawning a whole new project? I am happy to take a look at it, and I'm by no means trying to contradict your assumptions here. I just get concerned with the

Re: [Openstack-operators] Sydney Forum Topics

Sorry, clipboard fail. Thanks! On Sep 26, 2017 11:54 AM, "Jimmy McArthur" <ji...@openstack.org> wrote: > I think you want this page, actualy: http://forumtopics.openstack.org/ > > Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> > September 26, 2017

[Openstack-operators] Sydney Forum Topics

Hey Ops folks, We are in the process of submitting sessions the Forum to the foundation tool. You can see what is in so far here: http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/ I wanted to give everyone one last chance to go to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SYD-ops-session-ideas and add session

Re: [Openstack-operators] Forum Brainstorming

Hello Ops! As a followup to this, the Ops Meetup Team has set up a brainstorming etherpad to discuss possible forum sessions for Sydney. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SYD-ops-session-ideas This works the same as our Ops Mid-Cycle meetups. Post your session ideas, comment on other listed

Re: [Openstack-operators] UDP Buffer Filling

On Jul 28, 2017 8:51 AM, "John Petrini" wrote: Hi Saverio, Thanks for the info. The parameter is missing completely: I've came across the blueprint for adding the image property hw_vif_multiqueue_enabled. Do you know if this

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops and BoF sessions at the Summit / Forum

I am personally in favor of many Ceph sessions. As you suggested below, you should pitch your sessions when the forum session process starts. I'm sure you'll receive plenty of traffic. If you're interested in coming to Mexico City August 9 - 10, or would like us to discuss some Ceph-related topics

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][cinder][glance][neutron][horizon][policy] defining admin-ness

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Marc Heckmann > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 10:09 -0500, Lance Bragstad wrote: >> >> Also, with all the people involved with this thread,

[Openstack-operators] Ops Mid-Cycle Meetup - MEX - Session Planning

Hello Ops, We have begun planning the details for our next mid-cycle meetup in Mexico City, August 9 and 10th. We need help from all of you to come up with session ideas and to provide feedback on the proposals of others. Even if you are not planning to attend, your feedback would be appreciated.

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cannot launch instances on Ocata.

You'll want to check the nova-scheduler.log (controller) and the nova-compute.log (compute). You can look for your request ID and then go forward from there. Those should shed some more light on what the issue is -Erik On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wojnarek

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Affected by OSIC, Layoffs? Or want to help?

I'm floating this dev thread over to ops as I imagine recent layoffs could have affected some of you folks also, and ops are people too! http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115812.html Short version is, if you were planning to, or would like to attend the Openstack

Re: [Openstack-operators] openstack operators meetups team meeting 2017-4-11

Sorry for slacking off. I'm out on vacation this week. I'll be there next week for sure! Cheers, Erik On Apr 11, 2017 11:55 AM, "Chris Morgan" wrote: > Today's meeting was very thinly attended (minutes and log below). I would > like to encourage as many as possible

Re: [Openstack-operators] Forum in Boston - make some noise!

Is there any possible way to push this deadline out a week? I ask only because my brain hurts focusing on sessions for the midcycle, and things will almost certainly come up in Milan that will spawn ideas for the forum. I know everything is on a tight schedule, but just wanted to throw this out

[Openstack-operators] [baremetal][ironic] Ops midcycle Bare Metal session

Hello Ops, I have set up a skeleton etherpad for the Bare Metal session at the midcycle meetup in Milan. Please take a few minutes and add any topics you wish to discuss, or expand on anything that is already there. We welcome submissions from anyone, even if you're not planning to attend the

Re: [Openstack-operators] Operators Mid-Cycle Meetup Session Planning

included. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-ops-meetup Additionally, we could use a couple more moderators. If you are willing to moderate a session, please add your name to the list below the sessions. Thanks, Erik On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com>

[Openstack-operators] Operators Mid-Cycle Meetup Session Planning

Hello everyone, If you would like to have input into what sessions we have during the Milan meetup in March, now is the time. Please head over to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-ops-meetup and either add new session suggestions, or +1 those already on the list. We will be closing

Re: [Openstack-operators] CentOS 7.3 libvirt appears to be broken for virtio-scsi and ceph with cephx auth

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Mike Lowe wrote: > I got a rather nasty surprise upgrading from CentOS 7.2 to 7.3. As far as I > can tell the libvirt 2.0.0 that ships with 7.3 doesn’t behave the same way as > the 1.2.17 that ships with 7.2 when using ceph with cephx auth

Re: [Openstack-operators] operators meetups team meetings

+1 for later from me as well. I could also probably swing 23:00 if we're trying to accommodate Shintaro and he can be online at 7am Tokyo time. 12:30 or 13:00 would be OK also but that would make things really rough for any west coast people. On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Matt Jarvis

Re: [Openstack-operators] 2017 Openstack Operators Mid-Cycle Meetups - venue selection etherpads

iginal message - >> From: Matthias Runge <mru...@redhat.com> >> To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] 2017 Openstack Operators Mid-Cycle Meetups - venue selection etherpads >> Date: Thu, Oct 27, 2016 5:33 AM >> &

Re: [Openstack-operators] 2017 Openstack Operators Mid-Cycle Meetups - venue selection etherpads

The PTG is for devs to get together and get real work done. We would be a distraction from that goal. They will also be attending the forum which will run with the summits and will be able to spend more time in groups with ops for requirements gathering and such. -Erik On Oct 27, 2016 11:05 AM,

Re: [Openstack-operators] [gnocchi] monitoring storage use case inquiry

On Jul 31, 2016 8:32 PM, "Sam Morrison" wrote: > > Hi Gordon, > > We are using the influxDB backend and we have our retention policies set to: > > Every minute for an hour > Every 10 minutes for a day > Every hour for a year > > Currently we hover around 8,000 instances. > >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Reaching VXLAN tenant networks from outside (without floating IPs)

I've recently gone through provisioning Midonet (open source version) with the intent of tying their vxlan gateway in with my Cumulus switches. This approach should be usable with pretty much any vxlan-capable switch. If you're open to straying from the well travelled OVS/LB path, you may want to

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][osops] tools-contrib is open for business!

+1 for the "unless otherwise stated" bit. I seem to recall some non-standard requirements from the likes of HP. Apache should be a good default though. -Erik On Nov 19, 2015 11:31 PM, "Matt Fischer" wrote: > Is there a reason why we can't license the entire repo with

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

I'm still fishing for more specific details, but here is a snapshot of how the Ceph Development Summit is handled. http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/CDS_Jewel It was previously done via Google Hangouts, but is now done using Bluejeans. This is interesting especially since I believe

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Donald Talton wrote: > If only there we some kind of chat medium where people could listen in to > the live meetup and follow along in chat… > > > > Seriously though, how hard is it to find/designate someone as an IRC > translator for the

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

have something to strive for next time. I think we can all agree on a goal of extending participation as best we can without creating an impediment to getting real work done. > > - jlk > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Erik McCormick > <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> wrote:

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

I thought we were working toward a regional approach rather than having an "official" single meetup. Are you proposing to scrap the North America meetup entirely? What does official vs. unofficial entail? -Erik On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: > Hi

Re: [Openstack-operators] CentOS 7 KVM and QEMU 2.+

I've been building these and running them on CentOS for a while, mainly to get RBD support. They work fine. http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/ On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Arne Wiebalck wrote: > Hi, > > What about the CentOS

Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Mark Baker wrote: > Worth mentioning that OpenStack releases that come out at the same time as > Ubuntu LTS releases (12.04 + Essex, 14.04 + Icehouse, 16.04 + Mitaka) are > supported for 5 years by Canonical so are already kind of an LTS.

Re: [Openstack-operators] Informal Ops Meetup?

Which table are you all at? On Oct 29, 2015 11:53 PM, "Belmiro Moreira" < moreira.belmiro.email.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Belmiro > > > > > On Thursday, 29 October 2015, Kris G. Lindgren > wrote: > >> We seem to have enough interest… so meeting time will be at 10am

Re: [Openstack-operators] [neutron] Any users of Neutron's VPN advanced service?

I attempted to run it in Juno a while back and had very little success. I would love to be able to use it though, and will give it another shot once upgraded to Kilo. My issue was that several of the options coded into it for firing up a connection were specific to Freeswan which was deprecated,

Re: [Openstack-operators] Venom vulnerability

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: I had understood that CentOS 7.1 qemu-kvm has RBD support built-in. It was not there on 7.0 but http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10480 implies it is in 7.1. You could check on the centos mailing lists to be sure. Tim

Re: [Openstack-operators] YVR Wednesday Ops: Work sessions

If you have the power to put it in Sched, that would be spiffy I say. On May 18, 2015 9:22 PM, Lauren Sell lau...@openstack.org wrote: Would you like us to make these updates in sched? It's no problem On May 18, 2015 9:11:35 PM Jonathan Proulx j...@jonproulx.com wrote: Hi All, If you

Re: [Openstack-operators] over commit ratios

We had this discussion at the Ops Mid-Cycle meetup. I think the general consensus was 0.9 for memory. if you're running Ceph OSD's on the node you'll almost certainly want to reserve more than a gig for it and the OS. for CPU there was a wide range of ideas and it mainly depended on use-case. If

Re: [Openstack-operators] OpenStack services and ca certificate config entries

I'll start by saying I went the system bundle route also and have thus far had no issues with it. I'll also say that I'm using RDO packages still and not doing anything with venvs or pip installed stuff. On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: Thanks for starting

Re: [Openstack-operators] Help with glance issue after upgrade from Icehouse to Juno

That looks like a database connection error, not a keystone error. Double check your DB connection string / credentials and see if you can connect with the mysql client. On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Nathan Stratton nat...@robotics.net wrote: Sorry about that, never thought to look in

Re: [Openstack-operators] Instances stuck in 'Build'

:20 Erik McCormick emccorm...@cirrusseven.com wrote: On Jan 9, 2015 4:43 AM, Alex Leonhardt aleonhardt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, recently I started having problems when creating instances - every now and then they seem to get stuck in a 'Build' state. After I terminate that instance

Re: [Openstack-operators] Instances stuck in 'Build'

On Jan 9, 2015 4:43 AM, Alex Leonhardt aleonhardt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, recently I started having problems when creating instances - every now and then they seem to get stuck in a 'Build' state. After I terminate that instance and try again, it mostly goes through fine. This is happening

Re: [Openstack-operators] Glance image download failing in Juno with RBD store

, please upgrade glance_store to latest 0.1.9 in your environment. On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Erik McCormick emccorm...@cirrusseven.com wrote: Hi everyone, I've got a new deployment of Juno backed by Ceph set up and am getting a rather unhelpful error message when attempting

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ceph Implementations

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, MailingLists - EWS mailingli...@expresswebsystems.com wrote: Since there seems to be a fair amount of people on this list running Ceph with Openstack, I wanted to ask what configuration most people are using for their Ceph/Openstack configuration. We tried