.org>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future
Hi everyone,
I haven’t had any feedback regarding moving the Operations Guide to the
OpenStack wiki. I’m not taking silence as compliance. I would really like to
hear people’s opinions on this matter.
To recap:
1
Hey Blair,
Thanks ( I appreciate your offer of assistance. We are in full swing at the
moment. The spec is very close to being merged. You can view that here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472275/
I am still looking for someone who can help us out with the pandoc conversion.
I am happy to
Hi Alex,
On 2 June 2017 at 23:13, Alexandra Settle wrote:
> O I like your thinking – I’m a pandoc fan, so, I’d be interested in
> moving this along using any tools to make it easier.
I can't realistically offer much time on this but I would be happy to
help (ad-hoc)
Blair – correct, it was the majority in the room. I just wanted to reach out
and ensure that operators had a chance to voice opinions and see where we were
going (
Sounds like option 3 is still the favorable direction. This is going to be a
really big exercise, lifting the content out of the
Hi Alex,
Likewise for option 3. If I recall correctly from the summit session
that was also the main preference in the room?
On 2 June 2017 at 11:15, George Mihaiescu wrote:
> +1 for option 3
>
>
>
> On Jun 1, 2017, at 11:06, Alexandra Settle wrote:
Hi Alexandra, I have always been in favour of having operations guides
separate from an administration guide although there needs to be a lot of cross
reference.
IMHO, operations guides should have commands and instructions on how to
diagnose and remedy issues of a running installation.