Re: [Openstack-operators] [gnocchi][ceilometer] Taking Scientific WG Ops Meetup Feedback back to Ceilometer

2016-03-06 Thread gordon chung
On 04/03/2016 5:15 PM, Stig Telfer wrote: > >> On 4 Mar 2016, at 15:40, gordon chung wrote: >> >>> One part of the documentation set that we were missing was a guide to how >>> to migrate from ceilometer to a ceilometer/gnocchi combination (which I >>> understand is the ultimate

Re: [Openstack-operators] [gnocchi][ceilometer] Taking Scientific WG Ops Meetup Feedback back to Ceilometer

2016-03-04 Thread Stig Telfer
> On 4 Mar 2016, at 15:40, gordon chung wrote: > >> One part of the documentation set that we were missing was a guide to how to >> migrate from ceilometer to a ceilometer/gnocchi combination (which I >> understand is the ultimate architecture). We would like to migrate the >>

Re: [Openstack-operators] [gnocchi][ceilometer] Taking Scientific WG Ops Meetup Feedback back to Ceilometer

2016-03-04 Thread Tim Bell
On 04/03/16 16:40, "gordon chung" wrote: >> One part of the documentation set that we were missing was a guide to how to >> migrate from ceilometer to a ceilometer/gnocchi combination (which I >> understand is the ultimate architecture). We would like to migrate the >>

Re: [Openstack-operators] [gnocchi][ceilometer] Taking Scientific WG Ops Meetup Feedback back to Ceilometer

2016-03-04 Thread gordon chung
> One part of the documentation set that we were missing was a guide to how to > migrate from ceilometer to a ceilometer/gnocchi combination (which I > understand is the ultimate architecture). We would like to migrate the > historical data we have stored in ceilometer. > > The main line