Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Minimum VC version
On 5/15/2015 4:50 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, We would like to indicate that we do not support versions below 5.1.0 of the VC. Is anyone aware of people using versions below with OpenStack. Patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/183711/ proposes exiting Nova compute if a lower version is used. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Cross-posting to the operators mailing list. Also note the kilo docs mention supporting less than 5.0: http://docs.openstack.org/kilo/config-reference/content/vmware.html But 4.x was EOL over a year ago: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=2039567 Also note that the NSX CI (vmware CI) originally ran with vcenter 5.1 and is now running 5.5. -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Minimum VC version
- Original Message - From: Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-...@lists.openstack.org, But 4.x was EOL over a year ago: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=2039567 ...and was released in 2010. We're supporting a minimum version of libvirt from 2014, so I think that dropping support for five-year-old EOL'd VMware is good. We don't test it, which means it's probably broken. I also feel like this is a thing we can do without a deprecation cycle, assuming there aren't a ton of users still using unsupported commercial software out there. --Dan The proposed patch also drops support for 5.0, which as I understand it is not EOL'd? The documentation appears to indicate that some functionality will not work with 5.1, but it's not explicitly clear what that it is. Thanks, Steve ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Minimum VC version
But 4.x was EOL over a year ago: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=2039567 ...and was released in 2010. We're supporting a minimum version of libvirt from 2014, so I think that dropping support for five-year-old EOL'd VMware is good. We don't test it, which means it's probably broken. I also feel like this is a thing we can do without a deprecation cycle, assuming there aren't a ton of users still using unsupported commercial software out there. --Dan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Minimum VC version
The proposed patch also drops support for 5.0, which as I understand it is not EOL'd? The documentation appears to indicate that some functionality will not work with 5.1, but it's not explicitly clear what that it is. Yeah, I guess I assumed that anyone on 5.0 was just late moving to =5.1, where people on 4.x might have a license standing in their way. Maybe refusing 5.0 and warning about 5.5 (which is what is now being tested) is the right thing to do? --Dan ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
