Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we bump MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.2 in Liberty?

2015-05-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:23:25PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The minimum required version of libvirt in the driver is 0.9.11 still [1]. We've been gating against 1.2.2 in Ubuntu Trusty 14.04 since Juno. The libvirt

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we bump MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.2 in Liberty?

2015-05-15 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 5/15/2015 6:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:23:25PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The minimum required version of libvirt in the driver is 0.9.11 still [1]. We've been gating against 1.2.2 in

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we bump MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.2 in Liberty?

2015-05-15 Thread Robert Collins
On 16 May 2015 at 00:28, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: is not actually working around a bug the libvirt hypervisor. It is in fact a bug in the libvirt-python API binding. As such we don't actually need to increase the min required libvirt to be able to remove that check. In

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we bump MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.2 in Liberty?

2015-05-15 Thread John Garbutt
On 15 May 2015 at 12:28, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: One other thing I should have mentioned is that we don't actually have one single minimum libvirt version. We actually have a couple of different minimum versions based on either the architecture or the hypervisor. For