Thanks Mike ,
Thanks for sharing
VM
From: Mike Smith
Date: Saturday, 10 December 2016 at 08:22
To: Vahric Muhtaryan
Cc: David Medberry ,
"openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
,
Vahric -
We use Ceph for nova ephemeral as well on thousands of VMs and we love it.
Fast provisioning of VMs, solid, reliable and flexible. Works great with
live-migration. The only time we ever have a problem is an OSD is allowed to
get too full. Never let that happen!
Mike Smith
Lead
I'd say using Ceph for ephemeral disks is the most common deployment
pattern, at DataCentred we've been using it for years. It's rock solid and
has been for several releases. There were some edge case issues around
resizing and snapshotting, but I think that's all been fixed in the last
couple of
We've been using it and recommending it for years. It solves many many
problems with a running cloud and there have been very few issues. Pay
close attention when upgrading versions of CEPH and do things in the right
order and you will be fine!
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Vahric Muhtaryan
On 12/7/2016 9:25 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
We've been using Ceph as ephemeral backend (and glance store and
cinder backend) for > 2 years (maybe 3 ) and have been very happy.
cinder has been rock solid on RBD side. Early on when we had 6 osd
servers we lost one in production to a memory
We've been using Ceph as ephemeral backend (and glance store and
cinder backend) for > 2 years (maybe 3 ) and have been very happy.
cinder has been rock solid on RBD side. Early on when we had 6 osd
servers we lost one in production to a memory error. 1/6 is a large
fraction to loose but Ceph
Hello All,
I would like to use ephemeral disks with ceph instead of on nova compute
node. I saw that there is an option to configure it but find many different
bugs and reports for its not working , not stable , no success at the
instance creation time.
Anybody In this list use ceph as an