The previous discussion for LTS [1] was proposed by vendors as well as a
few large operators who willing to assign developers for the work (not sure
if the case might change?)
One key concern (as per last discussion) is the Infra CI constraints for
LTS.
If there are more interest in this topic, we
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 06:01:00PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
> :Right, but the distros aren't interested in funding developers for LTS
> :upstream work, much less a lot of the stable branch support upstream. It
> :shouldn't be sur
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 06:01:00PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
:Right, but the distros aren't interested in funding developers for LTS
:upstream work, much less a lot of the stable branch support upstream. It
:shouldn't be surprising why, that's where they can make money.
No doubt that's their t
On 4/11/2017 11:50 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:54:20PM +, Edgar Magana wrote:
:I hate to disagree with you my friend. I do not want to create a distro
dependency in the organization I work for. We want to deploy our OpenStack
Cloud out of the github repos all th
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:54:20PM +, Edgar Magana wrote:
:I hate to disagree with you my friend. I do not want to create a distro
dependency in the organization I work for. We want to deploy our OpenStack
Cloud out of the github repos all the time.
I don't mind disagreeing, but I don't thin
I hate to disagree with you my friend. I do not want to create a distro
dependency in the organization I work for. We want to deploy our OpenStack
Cloud out of the github repos all the time.
Edgar
On 4/11/17, 8:50 AM, "Jonathan D. Proulx" wrote:
Riding the LTS tangent train ...
Riding the LTS tangent train ...
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:40:20PM +, Kevin Bringard (kevinbri) wrote:
:Chasing trunk just isn’t feasible for larger organizations, and as Edgar
mentioned, updating the code every 6 months (or even a year) is a really
difficult proposition.
:
:There’s a re