Re: [Openstack-operators] Leveraging Gnocchi in Mitaka

2017-06-27 Thread Tracy Comstock Roesler
No worries, it makes me feel better to know I’m not doing something wrong. Thanks for all the assistance. On 6/27/17, 6:54 AM, "gordon chung" wrote: > > >On 26/06/17 06:07 PM, Tracy Comstock Roesler wrote: >> If I understand what you¹re saying, you think I can try >>

Re: [Openstack-operators] Leveraging Gnocchi in Mitaka

2017-06-27 Thread gordon chung
On 26/06/17 06:07 PM, Tracy Comstock Roesler wrote: > If I understand what you¹re saying, you think I can try > direct://?publisher=gnocchi in the pipeline.yaml on the controller nodes, > but not the compute nodes to bypass the collector? sorry, i just looked at the code again, it was only

Re: [Openstack-operators] Leveraging Gnocchi in Mitaka

2017-06-26 Thread Tracy Comstock Roesler
Hi Gordon, If I understand what you¹re saying, you think I can try direct://?publisher=gnocchi in the pipeline.yaml on the controller nodes, but not the compute nodes to bypass the collector? When I attempted to do so I received an error (full stack trace ommitted): 2017-06-26 14:52:51.625

Re: [Openstack-operators] Leveraging Gnocchi in Mitaka

2017-06-26 Thread gordon chung
On 24/06/17 10:49 PM, Mike Smith wrote: > We use ceilometer-compute and we would like to have it push metrics directly > to Gnocchi, bypassing the rabbit queues that ceilometer uses in the default > Mitaka configuration. Currently our ceilometer-compute pushes to the > notification queue,

Re: [Openstack-operators] Leveraging Gnocchi in Mitaka

2017-06-24 Thread Mike Smith
Thanks for the response Gordon. I work together with Tracy and can add a couple of things: We use ceilometer-compute and we would like to have it push metrics directly to Gnocchi, bypassing the rabbit queues that ceilometer uses in the default Mitaka configuration. Currently our

Re: [Openstack-operators] Leveraging Gnocchi in Mitaka

2017-06-23 Thread gordon chung
On 23/06/17 02:50 PM, Tracy Comstock Roesler wrote: > We’ve been using gnocchi in mitaka for a few months now but we’ve run > into some issues with performance, predominantly because of the number > of data points sent along rabbitmq. i'm not sure what rabbitmq has to do with gnocchi since