Re: [Openstack-operators] DiskFilter Disabled - No valid host was found

Hello William, I have not seen any warning in our nova-scheduler logs. We have verbose enabled but not debug mode, we have provisioned far more on cinder volumes than we have available local disk space on the hypervisors and we have not yet had any issues except for the fact that this is broken

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Performance][Meeting time] Possible meeting time change: feedback appreciated

Adrien, this looks good to me. Let's see what Joshua and Augie will think about it. Cheers, Dina On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:44 AM, wrote: > Hi Dina, > > 17:30 UTC means 19:30 in France (Summer time). > Considering that the meeting lasts in average 30/45 min, it would be

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Performance][Documentation] Please take a look on OpenStack perofmance-docs

Why isn't this content in the openstack-manuals repository? On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Kaustubh Kelkar wrote: > I might have missed it entirely, but I wasn't able to find virtual > resources used by the instances. IMO, it'd be great if one could see > instance

[Openstack-operators] [Group-based-policy] Question on GBP installation

Hi GBP Team, Now I'm trying to install OpenStack (Liberty) with GBP on RHEL7.2[1], but I can't find following packages from https://www.rdoproject.org/repos/rdo-release.rpm. - openstack-neutron-gbp - python-gbpclient - openstack-dashboard-gbp Do you know where it is? [1]

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Performance][Meeting time] Possible meeting time change: feedback appreciated

Ok, let's keep current (16:00 UTC) time slot for tomorrow meeting, until we'll find a better option. Cheers, Dina On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Augie Mena III wrote: > Hi Dina/Adrien, > > Not a great slot here in Austin (that would be noon). Would prefer a > 30-minute slot

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Performance][Documentation] Please take a look on OpenStack perofmance-docs

Matt, originally this started as an experiment - try to collect information about OpenStack scalability and performance and publish it to the community - and we started this experiment under Rally (OpenStack Benchmarking) umbrella, that's having its documentation space under

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Performance][Documentation] Please take a look on OpenStack perofmance-docs

Kaustubh, thanks for the comment. Usually if testing scenario require VM booting, its flavor is set in the Rally scenario configuration (e.g. here or here

Re: [Openstack-operators] Request for expression of interest (+1's) for Ops Meetup (Aug 25-26) session on User Enablement

There are two +1s on this now on the ether pad. It seems like it might flow nicely from the AUC session at 1.30 - 2.10 so I put it in Reception from 2.10 - 2:50 in your name. I think this is about the last change we can make and still allow time for the agenda to be designed and printed. Chris

Re: [Openstack-operators] Request for expression of interest (+1's) for Ops Meetup (Aug 25-26) session on User Enablement

Good deal! Timing sounds fine, thanks for squeezing it in! Cheer- John On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Chris Morgan wrote: > There are two +1s on this now on the ether pad. It seems like it might > flow nicely from the AUC session at 1.30 - 2.10 so I put it in Reception >