Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Poll: S Release Naming

2018-03-14 Thread Jens Harbott
2018-03-14 9:21 GMT+01:00 Sławomir Kapłoński : > Hi, > > Are You sure this link is good? I just tried it and I got info that "Already > voted" which isn't true in fact :) Comparing with previous polls, these should be personalized links that need to be sent out to each voter

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Poll: S Release Naming

2018-03-14 Thread Sławomir Kapłoński
Hi, Are You sure this link is good? I just tried it and I got info that "Already voted" which isn't true in fact :) — Best regards Slawek Kaplonski sla...@kaplonski.pl > Wiadomość napisana przez Paul Belanger w dniu > 14.03.2018, o godz. 00:58: > > Greetings all, >

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Poll: S Release Naming

2018-03-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
Jens Harbott wrote: > 2018-03-14 9:21 GMT+01:00 Sławomir Kapłoński : >> Hi, >> >> Are You sure this link is good? I just tried it and I got info that "Already >> voted" which isn't true in fact :) > > Comparing with previous polls, these should be personalized links that >

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Poll: S Release Naming

2018-03-14 Thread Sławomir Kapłoński
Indeed. I now tried from different IP address and I was able to vote. Thx a lot for help. — Best regards Slawek Kaplonski sla...@kaplonski.pl > Wiadomość napisana przez Thierry Carrez w dniu > 14.03.2018, o godz. 10:05: > > Jens Harbott wrote: >> 2018-03-14 9:21

Re: [Openstack-operators] Stable Branch EOL and "Extended Maintenance" Resolution

2018-03-14 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Hi everyone, I believe this resolution is getting close to being passed and so I highly suggest anyone interested provide any feedback they have good/bad/indifferent - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/548916/3/resolutions/20180301-stable-branch-eol.rst On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:42 AM, Anne

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] about rebuild instance booted from volume

2018-03-14 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Please do not default to deleting it, otherwise someone will eventually be back here asking why an irate user has just lost data. The better scenario is that the rebuild will fail (early - before impact to the running instance) with a quota error. Cheers, On Thu., 15 Mar. 2018, 00:46 Matt

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] about rebuild instance booted from volume

2018-03-14 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 3/14/2018 3:42 AM, 李杰 wrote:             This is the spec about  rebuild a instance booted from volume.In the spec,there is a       question about if we should delete the old root_volume.Anyone who is interested in       booted from volume can help to review this. Any suggestion is

Re: [Openstack-operators] How are you handling billing/chargeback?

2018-03-14 Thread Tim Bell
We’re using a combination of cASO (https://caso.readthedocs.io/en/stable/) and some low level libvirt fabric monitoring. The showback accounting reports are generated with merging with other compute/storage usage across various systems (HTCondor, SLURM, ...) It would seem that those who needed

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] about rebuild instance booted from volume

2018-03-14 Thread Tim Bell
Matt, To add another scenario and make things even more difficult (sorry (), if the original volume has snapshots, I don't think you can delete it. Tim -Original Message- From: Matt Riedemann Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] about rebuild instance booted from volume

2018-03-14 Thread Matthew Booth
On 14 March 2018 at 13:46, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 3/14/2018 3:42 AM, 李杰 wrote: > >> >> This is the spec about rebuild a instance booted from >> volume.In the spec,there is a >>question about if we should delete the old root_volume.Anyone who >> is

Re: [Openstack-operators] How are you handling billing/chargeback?

2018-03-14 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 03:21:13PM -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > I'm curious what folks out there are using for chargeback/billing in > your OpenStack environment. So far it looks like everyone is using a homegrown solution. Is anyone using an existing product/project? -- Lars

Re: [Openstack-operators] How are you handling billing/chargeback?

2018-03-14 Thread Tobias Urdin
We are using the billing engine part of the commercial software provided by Atomia [1]. Using ceilometer as of now, but they just recently added support for Gnocchi which we are gonna use for our newer setups. [1] https://www.atomia.com On 03/14/2018 05:13 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > On

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] about rebuild instance booted from volume

2018-03-14 Thread Tomáš Vondra
Hi! I say delete! Delete them all! Really, it's called delete_on_termination and should be ignored on Rebuild. We have a VPS service implemented on top of OpenStack and do throw the old contents away on Rebuild. When the user has the Backup service paid, they can restore a snapshot. Backup is

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] about rebuild instance booted from volume

2018-03-14 Thread Saverio Proto
My idea is that if delete_on_termination flag is set to False the Volume should never be deleted by Nova. my 2 cents Saverio 2018-03-14 15:10 GMT+01:00 Tim Bell : > Matt, > > To add another scenario and make things even more difficult (sorry (), if the > original volume has

Re: [Openstack-operators] How are you handling billing/chargeback?

2018-03-14 Thread Nick Jones
On 13/03, Simon Leinen wrote: Lars Kellogg-Stedman writes: I'm curious what folks out there are using for chargeback/billing in your OpenStack environment. We use a homegrown billing system that periodically samples utilization of billable resources. We had something similar at DataCentred

Re: [Openstack-operators] How are you handling billing/chargeback?

2018-03-14 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 07:21:39PM -0400, Mike Lowe wrote: > Ceilometer (now panko) vm exists events coerced to look like jobs from a HPC > batch system. Interesting. And are you feeding that into an off-the-shelf HPC accounting system, or did you have an existing locally-developed system in

Re: [Openstack-operators] Request for [ideas][help wanted] with OpenStack tooling

2018-03-14 Thread Pablo Iranzo Gómez
Hi all, Apart of some updates above what Robin mentioned in December (Now: 170+ plugins, ansible support, checks across different systems, web interface, json output, pip package, container, etc) we're starting to add support for Debian-based distributions. Would it be possible for you

[Openstack-operators] [forum] We want your session ideas for the Vancouver Forum!

2018-03-14 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Hey everyone, Please take time to put ideas for sessions at the forum in the TC and/or UC catch-all etherpads or any of the others that are appropriate: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Vancouver2018 We really want to get as many session ideas as possible so that the committee has too many

[Openstack-operators] [self-healing] Dublin PTG summary, and request for feedback

2018-03-14 Thread Adam Spiers
Hi all, I just posted a summary of the Self-healing SIG session at the Dublin PTG: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/2018-March/000317.html If you are interested in the topic of self-healing within OpenStack, you are warmly invited to subscribe to the openstack-sigs mailing