[Openstack-operators] [ANNOUNCE] [HA] new #openstack-ha IRC channel on FreeNode

[cross-posting to several lists; please trim the recipients list before replying!] Hi all, After discussion with members of the openstack-infra team, I registered new FreeNode IRC channel #openstack-ha. Discussion on all aspects of OpenStack High Availability is welcome in this channel.

[Openstack-operators] [HA] RFC: user story including hypervisor reservation / host maintenance / storage AZs / event history (fwd)

: a) whether you think our proposal to create four new user stories for each of these makes sense, and b) feedback on any of the individual usage scenarios. Thanks a lot! Adam - Forwarded message from Adam Spiers <aspi...@suse.com> - Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 00:19:52 +0100 From

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] VM HA support in trunk

Hi all, sorry I am late to this thread but I only just noticed it. Affan is exactly right. Architecting new cloud-native apps is obviously the ideal approach, but unfortunately the demands of the real-world mean that it is not possible to do this for all legacy workloads in a timely manner. I

[Openstack-operators] [HA] weekly High Availability meetings on IRC: change of time

Hi everyone, I have proposed moving the weekly High Availability IRC meetings one hour later, back to the original time of 0900 UTC every Monday. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349601/ Everyone is welcome to attend these meetings, so if you think you are likely to regularly attend, feel

[Openstack-operators] [HA] RFC: High Availability track at future Design Summits

Hi all, I doubt anyone would dispute that High Availability is a really important topic within OpenStack, yet none of the OpenStack conferences or Design Summits so far have provided an "official" track or similar dedicated space for discussion on HA topics. This is becoming increasingly

[Openstack-operators] [HA] RFC: High Availability feedback session for ops in Barcelona

Adam Spiers <aspi...@suse.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I doubt anyone would dispute that High Availability is a really > important topic within OpenStack, yet none of the OpenStack > conferences or Design Summits so far have provided an "official" track > or simi

Re: [Openstack-operators] [HA] RFC: user story including hypervisor reservation / host maintenance / storage AZs / event history (fwd)

Message- > > From: Adam Spiers [mailto:aspi...@suse.com] > > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 4:43 PM > > To: Juvonen, Tomi (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tomi.juvo...@nokia.com> > > Cc: openstack-operators mailing list > operat...@lists.openstack.org> > > Subject: Re: [Ope

Re: [Openstack-operators] [HA] MIL Ops meetup -- Rabbitmq Pitfalls with HA etherpad

Rochelle Grober wrote: Please add your comments, suggestions, info, etc. to the Rabbitmq with HA pitfalls etherpad. There are a few things out there already that will hopefully induce more and better items to include. See you tomorrow!

[Openstack-operators] [HA] follow-up from HA discussion at Boston Forum

Hi all, Sam P wrote: This is a quick reminder for HA Forum session at Boston Summit. Thank you all for your comments and effort to make this happen in Boston Summit. Time: Thu 11 , 11:00am-11:40am Location: Hynes Convention Center - Level One - MR 103 Etherpad:

Re: [Openstack-operators] Openstack HA test framework

Hi Imtiaz, Imtiaz Chowdhury wrote: I am looking for recommendations for an automated test framework can be used to test different Openstack HA failure scenarios. I know that Openstack Rally has some support but shall appreciate feedback on any HA test framework

[Openstack-operators] ANNOUNCE: Self-healing SIG officially formed (fwd)

As per below, I'm happy to announce that the Self-healing SIG is now officially formed. For now, all discussions will happen on <openstack-s...@lists.openstack.org>, so please subscribe to that list if you are interested in this topic! Cheers, Adam - Forwarded message from Adam

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [sig][upgrades][ansible][charms][tripleo][kolla][airship] reboot or poweroff?

[Adding openstack-sigs list too; apologies for the extreme cross-posting, but I think in this case the discussion deserves wide visibility. Happy to be corrected if there's a better way to handle this.] Hi James, James Page wrote: Hi All tl;dr we (the original founders) have not managed to

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [ptg] Self-healing SIG meeting moved to Thursday morning

Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi! Quick heads-up: Following a request[1] from Adam Spiers (SIG lead), we modified the PTG schedule to move the Self-Healing SIG meeting from Friday (all day) to Thursday morning (only morning). You can see the resulting schedule at: https://www.openstack.org/ptg

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder-volume and high availability

Jean-Philippe Méthot wrote: Hi, I’ve noticed that in the high-availability guide, it is not recommended to run cinder-volume in an active-active configuration. Active-active cinder-volume support is still in development, e.g. see

Re: [Openstack-operators] Cinder HA with zookeeper or redis?

Hi James, James Penick wrote: Hey folks, Does anyone have experience using zookeeper or redis to handle HA failover in cinder clusters? I'm guessing you mean failover of an active/passive cinder-volume service? I know there's docs on pacemaker, however we already have the other two

[Openstack-operators] [self-healing] Dublin PTG summary, and request for feedback

Hi all, I just posted a summary of the Self-healing SIG session at the Dublin PTG: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/2018-March/000317.html If you are interested in the topic of self-healing within OpenStack, you are warmly invited to subscribe to the openstack-sigs mailing

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] HA Guide, no Ubuntu instructions for HA Identity

Erik McCormick wrote: Looping the list back in since I accidentally dropped it yet again :/ On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Torin Woltjer wrote: That's good to know, thank you. Out of curiousity, without pacemaker/chorosync, does