Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future
Hey Blair, Thanks ( I appreciate your offer of assistance. We are in full swing at the moment. The spec is very close to being merged. You can view that here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472275/ I am still looking for someone who can help us out with the pandoc conversion. I am happy to go through it with said individual. Cheers, Alex On 6/23/17, 3:47 AM, "Blair Bethwaite"wrote: Hi Alex, On 2 June 2017 at 23:13, Alexandra Settle wrote: > O I like your thinking – I’m a pandoc fan, so, I’d be interested in > moving this along using any tools to make it easier. I can't realistically offer much time on this but I would be happy to help (ad-hoc) review/catalog/clean-up issues with export. > I think my only proviso (now I’m thinking about it more) is that we still > have a link on docs.o.o, but it goes to the wiki page for the Ops Guide. Agreed, need to maintain discoverability. -- Cheers, ~Blairo ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future
Hi Alex, On 2 June 2017 at 23:13, Alexandra Settlewrote: > O I like your thinking – I’m a pandoc fan, so, I’d be interested in > moving this along using any tools to make it easier. I can't realistically offer much time on this but I would be happy to help (ad-hoc) review/catalog/clean-up issues with export. > I think my only proviso (now I’m thinking about it more) is that we still > have a link on docs.o.o, but it goes to the wiki page for the Ops Guide. Agreed, need to maintain discoverability. -- Cheers, ~Blairo ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future
Blair – correct, it was the majority in the room. I just wanted to reach out and ensure that operators had a chance to voice opinions and see where we were going ( Sounds like option 3 is still the favorable direction. This is going to be a really big exercise, lifting the content out of the repos. Are people able to help? Thanks everyone for getting on board ( On 6/2/17, 2:44 AM, "Blair Bethwaite"wrote: Hi Alex, Likewise for option 3. If I recall correctly from the summit session that was also the main preference in the room? On 2 June 2017 at 11:15, George Mihaiescu wrote: > +1 for option 3 > > > > On Jun 1, 2017, at 11:06, Alexandra Settle wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I haven’t had any feedback regarding moving the Operations Guide to the > OpenStack wiki. I’m not taking silence as compliance. I would really like to > hear people’s opinions on this matter. > > > > To recap: > > > > Option one: Kill the Operations Guide completely and move the Administration > Guide to project repos. > Option two: Combine the Operations and Administration Guides (and then this > will be moved into the project-specific repos) > Option three: Move Operations Guide to OpenStack wiki (for ease of > operator-specific maintainability) and move the Administration Guide to > project repos. > > > > Personally, I think that option 3 is more realistic. The idea for the last > option is that operators are maintaining operator-specific documentation and > updating it as they go along and we’re not losing anything by combining or > deleting. I don’t want to lose what we have by going with option 1, and I > think option 2 is just a workaround without fixing the problem – we are not > getting contributions to the project. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Alex > > > > From: Alexandra Settle > Date: Friday, May 19, 2017 at 1:38 PM > To: Melvin Hillsman , OpenStack Operators > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [openstack-doc] > [dev] What's up doc? Summit recap edition > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Adding to this, I would like to draw your attention to the last dot point of > my email: > > > > “One of the key takeaways from the summit was the session that I joint > moderated with Melvin Hillsman regarding the Operations and Administration > Guides. You can find the etherpad with notes here: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/admin-ops-guides The session was really > helpful – we were able to discuss with the operators present the current > situation of the documentation team, and how they could help us maintain the > two guides, aimed at the same audience. The operator’s present at the > session agreed that the Administration Guide was important, and could be > maintained upstream. However, they voted and agreed that the best course of > action for the Operations Guide was for it to be pulled down and put into a > wiki that the operators could manage themselves. We will be looking at > actioning this item as soon as possible.” > > > > I would like to go ahead with this, but I would appreciate feedback from > operators who were not able to attend the summit. In the etherpad you will > see the three options that the operators in the room recommended as being > viable, and the voted option being moving the Operations Guide out of > docs.openstack.org into a wiki. The aim of this was to empower the > operations community to take more control of the updates in an environment > they are more familiar with (and available to others). > > > > What does everyone think of the proposed options? Questions? Other thoughts? > > > > Alex > > > > From: Melvin Hillsman > Date: Friday, May 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM > To: OpenStack Operators > Subject: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [openstack-doc] [dev] > What's up doc? Summit recap edition > > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Alexandra Settle > Date: Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:12 AM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [openstack-doc] [dev] What's up doc? Summit recap > edition > To: "openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org" > > Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > > Hi everyone, > > > The OpenStack
Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future
Hi Alex, Likewise for option 3. If I recall correctly from the summit session that was also the main preference in the room? On 2 June 2017 at 11:15, George Mihaiescuwrote: > +1 for option 3 > > > > On Jun 1, 2017, at 11:06, Alexandra Settle wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I haven’t had any feedback regarding moving the Operations Guide to the > OpenStack wiki. I’m not taking silence as compliance. I would really like to > hear people’s opinions on this matter. > > > > To recap: > > > > Option one: Kill the Operations Guide completely and move the Administration > Guide to project repos. > Option two: Combine the Operations and Administration Guides (and then this > will be moved into the project-specific repos) > Option three: Move Operations Guide to OpenStack wiki (for ease of > operator-specific maintainability) and move the Administration Guide to > project repos. > > > > Personally, I think that option 3 is more realistic. The idea for the last > option is that operators are maintaining operator-specific documentation and > updating it as they go along and we’re not losing anything by combining or > deleting. I don’t want to lose what we have by going with option 1, and I > think option 2 is just a workaround without fixing the problem – we are not > getting contributions to the project. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Alex > > > > From: Alexandra Settle > Date: Friday, May 19, 2017 at 1:38 PM > To: Melvin Hillsman , OpenStack Operators > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [openstack-doc] > [dev] What's up doc? Summit recap edition > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Adding to this, I would like to draw your attention to the last dot point of > my email: > > > > “One of the key takeaways from the summit was the session that I joint > moderated with Melvin Hillsman regarding the Operations and Administration > Guides. You can find the etherpad with notes here: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/admin-ops-guides The session was really > helpful – we were able to discuss with the operators present the current > situation of the documentation team, and how they could help us maintain the > two guides, aimed at the same audience. The operator’s present at the > session agreed that the Administration Guide was important, and could be > maintained upstream. However, they voted and agreed that the best course of > action for the Operations Guide was for it to be pulled down and put into a > wiki that the operators could manage themselves. We will be looking at > actioning this item as soon as possible.” > > > > I would like to go ahead with this, but I would appreciate feedback from > operators who were not able to attend the summit. In the etherpad you will > see the three options that the operators in the room recommended as being > viable, and the voted option being moving the Operations Guide out of > docs.openstack.org into a wiki. The aim of this was to empower the > operations community to take more control of the updates in an environment > they are more familiar with (and available to others). > > > > What does everyone think of the proposed options? Questions? Other thoughts? > > > > Alex > > > > From: Melvin Hillsman > Date: Friday, May 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM > To: OpenStack Operators > Subject: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [openstack-doc] [dev] > What's up doc? Summit recap edition > > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Alexandra Settle > Date: Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:12 AM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [openstack-doc] [dev] What's up doc? Summit recap > edition > To: "openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org" > > Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > > Hi everyone, > > > The OpenStack manuals project had a really productive week at the OpenStack > summit in Boston. You can find a list of all the etherpads and attendees > here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/docs-summit > > > > As we all know, we are rapidly losing key contributors and core reviewers. > We are not alone, this is happening across the board. It is making things > harder, but not impossible. Since our inception in 2010, we’ve been climbing > higher and higher trying to achieve the best documentation we could, and > uphold our high standards. This is something to be incredibly proud of. > However, we now need to take a step back and realise that the amount of work > we are attempting to maintain is now out of reach for the team size that we > have. At the moment we have 13 cores, of which none are full time > contributors or reviewers. This includes myself. > > > > That being said! I have spent the last week at the summit talking to some of > our leaders, including Doug
Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future
Hi Alexandra, I have always been in favour of having operations guides separate from an administration guide although there needs to be a lot of cross reference. IMHO, operations guides should have commands and instructions on how to diagnose and remedy issues of a running installation. Administration guides should have lots of detail on configuration and how to implement features. On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 15:06 +, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I haven’t had any feedback regarding moving the Operations Guide to the > OpenStack wiki. I’m not taking silence as compliance. I would really like to > hear people’s opinions > on this matter. > > To recap: > > > Option one: Kill the Operations Guide > completely and move the Administration Guide to project repos.Option two: > Combine the Operations and > Administration Guides (and then this will be moved into the project-specific > repos)Option three: Move Operations Guide to > OpenStack wiki (for ease of operator-specific maintainability) and move the > Administration Guide to project repos. > > Personally, I think that option 3 is more realistic. The idea for the last > option is that operators are maintaining operator-specific documentation and > updating it as they > go along and we’re not losing anything by combining or deleting. I don’t > want to lose what we have by going with option 1, and I think option 2 is > just a workaround without fixing the problem – we are not getting > contributions to the project. > > Thoughts? > > Alex > > > From: > Alexandra Settle> > Date: Friday, May 19, 2017 at 1:38 PM > > To: Melvin Hillsman , OpenStack Operators > > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [openstack-doc] [dev] > What's up doc? Summit recap edition > > > > > Hi everyone, > > Adding to this, I would like to draw your attention to the last dot point of > my email: > > “One of the key takeaways from the summit was the session that I joint > moderated with Melvin Hillsman regarding the Operations and Administration > Guides. You can find the etherpad with notes here: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/admin-ops-guides The session was really > helpful – we were able to discuss with the operators present the current > situation of the documentation team, and how they could help us maintain the > two guides, aimed at the same > audience. The operator’s present at the session agreed that the > Administration Guide was important, and could be maintained upstream. > However, they voted and agreed that the best course of action for the > Operations Guide was for it to be pulled down and put > into a wiki that the operators could manage themselves. We will be looking > at actioning this item as soon as possible.” > > I would like to go ahead with this, but I would appreciate feedback from > operators who were not able to attend the summit. In the etherpad you will > see the three options that the operators in the room recommended as being > viable, and the voted option being moving the Operations Guide out of > docs.openstack.org into a wiki. The aim of this was to empower the operations > community to take more control of > the updates in an environment they are more familiar with (and available to > others). > > What does everyone think of the proposed options? Questions? Other thoughts? > > Alex > > > From: > Melvin Hillsman > > Date: Friday, May 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM > > To: OpenStack Operators > > Subject: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [openstack-doc] [dev] > What's up doc? Summit recap edition > > > > > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: Alexandra Settle > > Date: Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:12 AM > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [openstack-doc] [dev] What's up doc? Summit recap > edition > > To: "openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org" > > Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > The OpenStack manuals project had a really productive week at the OpenStack > summit in Boston. You can find a list of all the etherpads and attendees here: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/docs-summit > > > > > As we all know, we are rapidly losing key contributors and core reviewers. We > are not alone, this is happening across the board. It is making things > harder, but not impossible. Since our inception in 2010, we’ve been climbing > higher and higher trying to achieve the best documentation we could, and > uphold our high standards. This is something to be incredibly proud of. > However, we now need to take a step back and realise that the amount of work > we are attempting to maintain