Re: [Openstack-operators] Octavia LBaaS - networking requirements
Thank you very much for this cristal clear statement, in the meantime I watched the sidney Octavia session and had answers on side questions. The Openstack community is really kickass, thanks everyone! Le mar. 6 févr. 2018 à 17:52, Michael Johnson a écrit : > No issue with using an L2 network for the lb-mgmt-net. > > It only requires the following: > Controllers can reach amphora-agent IPs on the TCP bind_port (default 9443) > Amphora-agents can reach the controllers in the > controller_ip_port_list via UDP (default ) > > This can be via an L2 lb-mgmt-net (provider or other) or in some > routing combination. > > I have started work on a detailed installation guide that will cover > these options. Hopefully I can get it done during Rocky. > > Michael > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:57 AM, Flint WALRUS > wrote: > > Ok, that’s what I was understanding from the documentation but as I > couldn’t > > find any information related to the L3 specifics I prefer to have another > > check that mine only x) > > > > I’ll have to install and operate Octavia within an unusual L2 only > network > > and I would like to be sure I’ll not push myself from the cliff :-) > > > > Le mar. 6 févr. 2018 à 10:53, Volodymyr Litovka a > écrit : > >> > >> Hi Flint, > >> > >> I think, Octavia expects reachibility between components over management > >> network, regardless of network's technology. > >> > >> > >> On 2/6/18 11:41 AM, Flint WALRUS wrote: > >> > >> Hi guys, I’m wondering if the Octavia lb-mgmt-net can be a L2 provider > >> network instead of a neutron L3 vxlan ? > >> > >> Is Octavia specifically relying on L3 networking or can it operate > without > >> neutron L3 features ? > >> > >> I didn't find anything specifically related to the network requirements > >> except for the network itself. > >> > >> Thanks guys! > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> OpenStack-operators mailing list > >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Volodymyr Litovka > >> "Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison > > > > > > ___ > > OpenStack-operators mailing list > > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Octavia LBaaS - networking requirements
No issue with using an L2 network for the lb-mgmt-net. It only requires the following: Controllers can reach amphora-agent IPs on the TCP bind_port (default 9443) Amphora-agents can reach the controllers in the controller_ip_port_list via UDP (default ) This can be via an L2 lb-mgmt-net (provider or other) or in some routing combination. I have started work on a detailed installation guide that will cover these options. Hopefully I can get it done during Rocky. Michael On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:57 AM, Flint WALRUS wrote: > Ok, that’s what I was understanding from the documentation but as I couldn’t > find any information related to the L3 specifics I prefer to have another > check that mine only x) > > I’ll have to install and operate Octavia within an unusual L2 only network > and I would like to be sure I’ll not push myself from the cliff :-) > > Le mar. 6 févr. 2018 à 10:53, Volodymyr Litovka a écrit : >> >> Hi Flint, >> >> I think, Octavia expects reachibility between components over management >> network, regardless of network's technology. >> >> >> On 2/6/18 11:41 AM, Flint WALRUS wrote: >> >> Hi guys, I’m wondering if the Octavia lb-mgmt-net can be a L2 provider >> network instead of a neutron L3 vxlan ? >> >> Is Octavia specifically relying on L3 networking or can it operate without >> neutron L3 features ? >> >> I didn't find anything specifically related to the network requirements >> except for the network itself. >> >> Thanks guys! >> >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> >> -- >> Volodymyr Litovka >> "Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison > > > ___ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Octavia LBaaS - networking requirements
Ok, that’s what I was understanding from the documentation but as I couldn’t find any information related to the L3 specifics I prefer to have another check that mine only x) I’ll have to install and operate Octavia within an unusual L2 only network and I would like to be sure I’ll not push myself from the cliff :-) Le mar. 6 févr. 2018 à 10:53, Volodymyr Litovka a écrit : > Hi Flint, > > I think, Octavia expects reachibility between components over management > network, regardless of network's technology. > > > On 2/6/18 11:41 AM, Flint WALRUS wrote: > > Hi guys, I’m wondering if the Octavia lb-mgmt-net can be a L2 provider > network instead of a neutron L3 vxlan ? > > Is Octavia specifically relying on L3 networking or can it operate without > neutron L3 features ? > > I didn't find anything specifically related to the network requirements > except for the network itself. > > Thanks guys! > > > ___ > OpenStack-operators mailing > listOpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > -- > Volodymyr Litovka > "Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison > > ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Re: [Openstack-operators] Octavia LBaaS - networking requirements
Hi Flint, I think, Octavia expects reachibility between components over management network, regardless of network's technology. On 2/6/18 11:41 AM, Flint WALRUS wrote: Hi guys, I’m wondering if the Octavia lb-mgmt-net can be a L2 provider network instead of a neutron L3 vxlan ? Is Octavia specifically relying on L3 networking or can it operate without neutron L3 features ? I didn't find anything specifically related to the network requirements except for the network itself. Thanks guys! ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators -- Volodymyr Litovka "Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
