Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

[Andreas Scheuring]

No problem from s390x point of view. With Ubuntu we’re currently using* qemu: 2.10.1* libvirt: 3.6.0Thanks!
---Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s)

On 30. Mar 2018, at 16:26, Kashyap Chamarthy  wrote:The last version bump was in "Pike" release (commit: b980df0,11-Feb-2017), and we didn't do any bump during "Queens".  So it's timeto increment the versions (which will also makes us get rid of somebackward compatibility cruft), and pick future versions of libvirt andQEMU.  As it stands, during the "Pike" release the advertized NEXT_MIN versions   were set to: libvirt 1.3.1 and QEMU 2.5.0 -- but they weren't actually bumped for the "Queens" release.  So they will now be applied for the  "Rocky" release.  (Hmm, but note that libvirt 1.3.1 was released more  than 2 years ago[1].)  While at it, we should also discuss about what will be the NEXT_MIN    libvirt and QEMU versions for the "Solar" release.  To that end, I've  spent going through different distributions and updated the    DistroSupportMatrix Wiki[2].   Taking the DistroSupportMatrix into picture, for the sake of discussion,how about the following NEXT_MIN versions for "Solar" release: (a) libvirt: 3.2.0 (released on 23-Feb-2017)       This satisfies most distributions, but will affect Debian "Stretch",       as they only have 3.0.0 in the stable branch -- I've checked their    repositories[3][4].  Although the latest update for the stable    release "Stretch (9.4)" was released only on 10-March-2018, I don't    think they increment libvirt and QEMU versions in stable.  Is    there another way for "Stretch (9.4)" users to get the relevant    versions from elsewhere?   (b) QEMU: 2.9.0 (released on 20-Apr-2017)      This too satisfies most distributions but will affect Oracle Linux    -- which seem to ship QEMU 1.5.3 (released in August 2013) with    their "7", from the Wiki.  And will also affect Debian "Stretch" --    as it only has 2.8.0Can folks chime in here?[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-announce/2016-January/msg2.html[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix[3] https://packages.qa.debian.org/libv/libvirt.html[4] https://packages.qa.debian.org/libv/libvirt.html-- /kashyap___OpenStack-operators mailing listOpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

[Kashyap Chamarthy]

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 03:17:52PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:49:17AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote:

[...]

> > > Taking the DistroSupportMatrix into picture, for the sake of discussion,
> > > how about the following NEXT_MIN versions for "Solar" release:
> > >  
> > > 
> > Correction - for the "Stein" release. :)
> 
> Darn, I should've triple-checked before I assumed it is to be "Solar".
> If "Stein" is confirmed; I'll re-send this email with the correct
> release name for clarity.

It actually is:

http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-March/128899.html
-- All Hail our Newest Release Name - OpenStack Stein

(That email went into 'openstack-operators' maildir for me; my filtering
fault.)

I won't start another thread;, will just leave this existing thread
intact, as people will read it as: "whatever name the 'S' release ends
up with" (as 'fungi' put it on IRC).

[...]

-- 
/kashyap

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

[Kashyap Chamarthy]

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:49:17AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > While at it, we should also discuss about what will be the NEXT_MIN 
> >
> > libvirt and QEMU versions for the "Solar" release.  To that end, I've   
> >
> > spent going through different distributions and updated the 
> >
> > DistroSupportMatrix Wiki[2].   
> > 
> > Taking the DistroSupportMatrix into picture, for the sake of discussion,
> > how about the following NEXT_MIN versions for "Solar" release:  
> >
> > 
> Correction - for the "Stein" release. :)

Darn, I should've triple-checked before I assumed it is to be "Solar".
If "Stein" is confirmed; I'll re-send this email with the correct
release name for clarity.

Thanks for correcting.

-- 
/kashyap

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

[Melvin Hillsman]

;)

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Sean McGinnis 
wrote:

> > While at it, we should also discuss about what will be the NEXT_MIN
> > libvirt and QEMU versions for the "Solar" release.  To that end, I've
> > spent going through different distributions and updated the
> > DistroSupportMatrix Wiki[2].
> >
> > Taking the DistroSupportMatrix into picture, for the sake of discussion,
> > how about the following NEXT_MIN versions for "Solar" release:
> >
> Correction - for the "Stein" release. :)
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>



-- 
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
mrhills...@gmail.com
mobile: (832) 264-2646
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

[Sean McGinnis]

> While at it, we should also discuss about what will be the NEXT_MIN   
>  
> libvirt and QEMU versions for the "Solar" release.  To that end, I've 
>  
> spent going through different distributions and updated the   
>  
> DistroSupportMatrix Wiki[2].   
> 
> Taking the DistroSupportMatrix into picture, for the sake of discussion,
> how about the following NEXT_MIN versions for "Solar" release:
>  
> 
Correction - for the "Stein" release. :)


___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators