I'm going to be on a flight tomorrow.
Given that cinder started with nova code and removed code that was not
needed for nova-volumes, I'm hoping we can minimize the time that the
project isn't in core. (potentially replacing nova-volumes in folsom
- since the work to keep both nova+nova-volumes
Jay Pipes wrote:
On the questions at hand, here are my thoughts:
1) satellite.openstack.org - we talked about setting something similar
up a long time ago around Related Projects but never had the
bandwidth. I think if we can get user curation tools in there so
there's some form distributed
We have 2 requests to use openstack.org for community-related technical
projects: one for satellite projects and one as the package name for a java
library. Would you all prefer to discuss tomorrow at 3:00 PM CDT/20:00 UTC or
over email?
Jonathan.
Email.
On 04/09/2012 01:30 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
We have 2 requests to use openstack.org for community-related technical
projects: one for satellite projects and one as the package name for a java
library. Would you all prefer to discuss tomorrow at 3:00 PM CDT/20:00 UTC or
over email?
Jonathan Bryce wrote:
We have 2 requests to use openstack.org for community-related technical
projects: one for satellite projects and one as the package name for a java
library. Would you all prefer to discuss tomorrow at 3:00 PM CDT/20:00 UTC or
over email?
Either.
Can't hurt to meet,
On 04/09/2012 06:04 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
This week is actually very busy for me so if people are open to email, that
would be my preference. We should definitely schedule an in person next week
though.
On the questions at hand, here are my thoughts:
1) satellite.openstack.org - we
Anyone have anything they would like to discuss tomorrow? After the Essex crush
is over, I'd like to discuss the Technical Committee, but I would say do it
after this week unless anyone objects. Thierry has a draft in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Foundation/TechnicalCommittee
Didn't see anything on the list or wiki, so no meeting today.
Jonathan.
On Mar 5, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
Good catch. Added him as well. Sorry, Dan!
On Mar 5, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Jonathan Bryce wrote:
Anything we need to discuss? Read through the
Jonathan Bryce wrote:
Anything we need to discuss? Read through the logs from last week's meeting
and couldn't tell if Monty still needed something from us to move forward
with the Satellite CI project.
Also, welcome to Joe Heck, the new Keystone PTL and Brian Waldon the new
Glance PTL.
Thanks Jonathan,
I'm not totally sure of the procedure here, so I created a wiki page
that is an updated version of the original application for incubation:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Projects/CoreApplication/Quantum
I look forward to talking with you all about this in more detail
tomorrow at the
Dan Wendlandt wrote:
Thanks Jonathan,
I'm not totally sure of the procedure here, so I created a wiki page
that is an updated version of the original application for incubation:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Projects/CoreApplication/Quantum
I look forward to talking with you all about this in
I know it's slightly past the 2 pm cutoff, but would like to go ahead and meet
tomorrow to discuss Quantum. Dan is interested in getting Quantum promoted to
core for the Folsom release cycle and we need to review soon if we're going to
make it. I updated the agenda on the wiki.
Jonathan.
Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project
from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn what progress has been
made and whether we can expect to see more common code alignment in
Essex or Folsom...
Thanks!
-jay
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jonathan Bryce
Thanks, Jason.
Jay, do you still want to discuss this live tomorrow?
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Jason Kölker wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 13:11 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project
from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn
No, that's fine as a status update. No need to bring this up tomorrow.
Thanks Jason!
-jay
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote:
Thanks, Jason.
Jay, do you still want to discuss this live tomorrow?
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Jason Kölker wrote:
On
Sounds good. Since we didn't have any other items before the cutoff, no meeting
tomorrow.
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
No, that's fine as a status update. No need to bring this up tomorrow.
Thanks Jason!
-jay
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Bryce
OK.
-Original Message-
From: openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Bryce
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:38 PM
To: openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack-poc
How do you all feel about doing our meeting tomorrow over lunch from 1:00-2:00?
This seems to be about the only time that's clear. John Dickinson had the idea
of putting it on sched as well so anyone interested can attend.
Let me know if this works for you all. Thanks,
Jonathan.
Thierry, can you add it to the schedule for 1 tomorrow?
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
++
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Josh Kearney j...@jk0.org wrote:
Works for me.
On Oct 3, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote:
How do you all feel about doing our meeting
-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Bryce
Sent: 18 September 2011 09:31
To: openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Here is a link to an Etherpad to use as a scratchpad for the RFC on
API guidelines:
http
Jay Pipes wrote:
As for the API coordinator, I thought we had already voted yes on that?
My position on the API coordinator is that there is no need for
amending our governance and creating an official position for that.
I'm all in favor of a technical meritocracy where someone that cares
about
an agreed to position as to what is within the OpenStack charter and what is
clearly not.
John
From: Joshua McKenty [mailto:j...@piston.cc]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 5:08 AM
To: Jay Pipes
Cc: John Purrier; openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
I
As a reminder, we have a Policy Board meeting scheduled for tomorrow in the
hour before the weekly team meeting. The Policy Board meeting is 2000 UTC/3:00
PM CDT.
We currently have two incubation applications on the agenda. If you get an
opportunity, please try to review them before the
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:17 PM, John Purrier wrote:
For tomorrow's meeting... PTL's, can you update us on where each of your
projects stand on this? Termie and mtaylor (added to the email) were going
to come up with a plan for review, is this getting done?
I have a very good start on swift's
@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Thierry Carrez
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:48 PM
To: openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
John Purrier wrote:
Does it make sense to discuss the state/progress on the GitHub migration
project? I think someone needs to set some
I shared an initial plan with a few people (mostly PTLs + thierry, I think)
and it kind of stalled out on getting pushed to the main list due to Monty /
Thierry wanting additional features from GitHub.
I've been mostly talking with John DIckinson as it seems like Swift is the
likely first project
26 matches
Mail list logo
