John Dickinson wrote:
I have found the PPB meetings to be very disjointed and hard to follow. A
classic example is from our last meeting where 3 votes were proposed and only
2 were voted on. At times we have several conversations going on at once.
Sometimes we vote, someone continues the
Thanks John for bringing this up and everyone for the input. This is good
feedback. Here are a couple of my thoughts on it:
1) I agree that the meetings get rather chaotic at times. I would say that most
of the time that situation is less related to non-PPB users and more related to
those of
On Sep 12, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
Thanks John for bringing this up and everyone for the input. This is good
feedback. Here are a couple of my thoughts on it:
1) I agree that the meetings get rather chaotic at times. I would say that
most of the time that situation is
3) Along the lines of getting community feedback, do you all think that we
should move to a two-part process where we discuss, send to a summary to the
community requesting comments and then vote? Should we just try to gather
feedback before we ever discuss?
I'd suggest that for most
I have found the PPB meetings to be very disjointed and hard to follow. A
classic example is from our last meeting where 3 votes were proposed and only 2
were voted on. At times we have several conversations going on at once.
Sometimes we vote, someone continues the discussion, and then we
John,
We were just discussing this problem the other day. I'm hesitant to mute
people, but the chaos is hard to follow. I often have to go back and read
the logs to study what people's opinions are. I would be interested in
trying some of your suggestions with the appropriate time for comments
To be clear, I too am hesitant to mute people. I do not want muting to be seen
as a tool used to silence discussion or opinions. I only see it as useful as a
potential way to organize the discussion to allow for more clarity.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Paul Voccio
++
On 09/09/2011 03:07 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
To be clear, I too am hesitant to mute people. I do not want muting to
be seen as a tool used to silence discussion or opinions. I only see it
as useful as a potential way to organize the discussion to allow for
more clarity.
Sent from my
8 matches
Mail list logo
