I'm going to be on a flight tomorrow. Given that cinder started with nova code and removed code that was not needed for nova-volumes, I'm hoping we can minimize the time that the project isn't in core. (potentially replacing nova-volumes in folsom - since the work to keep both nova+nova-volumes and nova+cinder will be duplicate since the code started at the same place in folsom day 1)
Jesse On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Jonathan Bryce wrote: >> Besides continuing discussion of the 3rd party API question, is there >> anything else for the agenda tomorrow? > > Time permitting, we could discuss Cinder "coreness" and how much of our > "long path to become core" an existing core project split can actually > avoid. > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > Release Manager, OpenStack > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc > Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
