On 05/03/2012 04:08 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Joshua McKenty wrote:
I'm a fan of c), where the officialness is tied to a committed
organization or team that is keeping the code up-to-date and tested. I'd
also be a fan of making that a per-release designation, with an easy
renewal if the
Email.
On 04/09/2012 01:30 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
We have 2 requests to use openstack.org for community-related technical
projects: one for satellite projects and one as the package name for a java
library. Would you all prefer to discuss tomorrow at 3:00 PM CDT/20:00 UTC or
over email?
On 04/09/2012 06:04 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
This week is actually very busy for me so if people are open to email, that
would be my preference. We should definitely schedule an in person next week
though.
On the questions at hand, here are my thoughts:
1) satellite.openstack.org - we
Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project
from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn what progress has been
made and whether we can expect to see more common code alignment in
Essex or Folsom...
Thanks!
-jay
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jonathan Bryce
, 2012-01-30 at 13:11 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project
from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn what progress has been
made and whether we can expect to see more common code alignment in
Essex or Folsom...
I think Folsom
Hi PPB,
So, recently, we've had discussions about who is responsible for a
project's API and some discussions around coordination of APIs across
OpenStack projects and general guidelines about APIs. All good stuff.
However, I'd like to broach a subject that recently I've been thinking
quite a
I'd like to point out that incubation of a project and a proposed API
are two very different things, and if we couple them too tightly, we
will make unnecessary problems for ourselves.
I feel that there should be ZERO barrier to entry for the proposal of
the API spec. Once people determine what
cool with me.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote:
So no one has had anything they wanted to discuss. I propose we skip this
week's meeting and let everyone have a productive hour back. Any objections?
Jonathan.
On Apr 6, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Jonathan
8 matches
Mail list logo
