On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
New point for the agenda. We have stuff that needs to go into
openstack-common, and we don't really have a PTL for stuff there. Who
manages this? Authn should
On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:31 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Like Eric said, in order to make sure we're not changing only for a
vocal minority, the PPB needs to vote. We don't want to set a precedent
for vocal proponents of the next cool thing to force us to change again
in 6 months.
...snip...
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:17 PM, John Purrier wrote:
For tomorrow's meeting... PTL's, can you update us on where each of your
projects stand on this? Termie and mtaylor (added to the email) were going
to come up with a plan for review, is this getting done?
I have a very good start on swift's
I have found the PPB meetings to be very disjointed and hard to follow. A
classic example is from our last meeting where 3 votes were proposed and only 2
were voted on. At times we have several conversations going on at once.
Sometimes we vote, someone continues the discussion, and then we
with the appropriate time for comments and
discussion with the community.
pvo
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 09/09/2011 11:05 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
I have found the PPB meetings to be very disjointed and hard to
follow. A classic example is from
On Sep 12, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
Thanks John for bringing this up and everyone for the input. This is good
feedback. Here are a couple of my thoughts on it:
1) I agree that the meetings get rather chaotic at times. I would say that
most of the time that situation is
On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
2) Why does the PPB need to vote? Actually, what would the PPB be
voting on (assuming the answer to #1 is no)?
Well, it would be effectively promoting several existing projects which
are managed in a few different places (rackspace, 4P, etc)
On May 3, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
The term recommended comes with a lot of baggage :) I don't want plugins to
be recommended or suggested -- at least by the community; companies should
feel free to recommend or suggest whatever they feel is best for their distro
or deployment.
8 matches
Mail list logo
