Re: [Openstack-xenapi] XenAPI virt-layer Variable Naming-Scheme

2011-03-07 Thread Ed Leafe
On Mar 6, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Ewan Mellor wrote: I do use _rec for a record, if I feel that it needs distinguishing explicitly. I’d prefer that we allowed vm or vm_rec for a record (that would give us less to fix up, apart from anything else!) In most of the code, the convention is

Re: [Openstack-xenapi] XenAPI virt-layer Variable Naming-Scheme

2011-03-07 Thread Rick Harris
@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack-xenapi] XenAPI virt-layer Variable Naming-Scheme On Mar 6, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Ewan Mellor wrote: I do use _rec for a record, if I feel that it needs distinguishing explicitly. I’d prefer that we allowed vm or vm_rec for a record (that would give us less to fix

Re: [Openstack-xenapi] XenAPI virt-layer Variable Naming-Scheme

2011-03-07 Thread Ewan Mellor
-Original Message- From: Ed Leafe [mailto:ed.le...@rackspace.com] Sent: 07 March 2011 16:28 To: Ewan Mellor Cc: Chris Behrens; Rick Harris; openstack-xenapi@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack-xenapi] XenAPI virt-layer Variable Naming- Scheme On Mar 6, 2011, at 8:29 AM

Re: [Openstack-xenapi] XenAPI virt-layer Variable Naming-Scheme

2011-03-06 Thread Ewan Mellor
Harris Cc: openstack-xenapi@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack-xenapi] XenAPI virt-layer Variable Naming-Scheme Totally agree. On Mar 5, 2011, at 8:26 PM, Rick Harris rick.har...@rackspace.commailto:rick.har...@rackspace.com wrote: Reading through the XenAPI virt-layer code, I've noticed