+1. Let's do it.
If we need to add some extra tests to protect against regressions, then so be
it. I will help.
I also think better use could be made of the notifications system. A properly
defined topic namespace would go a long way to assist that.
-Original Message-
From:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Haynes, Dave (Cloud Services)
dave.hay...@hp.com wrote:
+1. Let's do it.
If we need to add some extra tests to protect against regressions, then so
be it. I will help.
I also think better use could be made of the notifications system. A
properly defined
@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+stanislaw.pitucha=hp@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Johannes Erdfelt
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 6:12 PM
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Discussion / proposal: deleted column marker
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012, Pitucha, Stanislaw Izaak
: openstack-bounces+stanislaw.pitucha=hp@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+stanislaw.pitucha=hp@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Johannes Erdfelt
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 6:12 PM
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Discussion / proposal: deleted column
:
openstack-bounces+philip.day=hp@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Pitucha, Stanislaw Izaak
Sent: 03 October 2012 13:09
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Discussion / proposal: deleted column marker
Hi Johannes,
I know the names collide here, but since
+1 to the design proposed here.
Even without embracing anything nova specific but simply from a database
perspective the soft-delete approach is proven to be a poor solution to most of
the problems it promises to solve.
In addition to what Stan already pointed out, let me recap something
+1 to the design proposed here
Looks like there is already a session proposed for Grizzly summit:
http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/63
best,
Joe
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Federico Innocenti
federico.innoce...@hp.com wrote:
+1 to the design proposed here.
Even without
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Pitucha, Stanislaw Izaak
stanislaw.pitu...@hp.com wrote:
... - Add a system similar to notifications, but for auditable events - who did
what with which resource at what time - in some semi-structured way that
allows reviewing and summaries (basic information as
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012, Pitucha, Stanislaw Izaak stanislaw.pitu...@hp.com wrote:
I'd like to open a discussion on a topic that's been bugging me for a number
of reasons - soft deletes (by that I mean marking rows with deleted=1 in the
db) and related - actions audit.
This is a subject I'm
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012, Pitucha, Stanislaw Izaak stanislaw.pitu...@hp.com wrote:
Does anyone know why soft-delete is still in place?
Are there any reasons it can't / shouldn't be removed at this time?
If it's possible to remove it, would you miss it?
I'm certainly not a fan of the database
10 matches
Mail list logo
