I, mistakingly, changed the subject so I could focus on the install directory.
Sorry for creating a rift.
Hopefully, I'm going to move it in such a way that we don't need to mess with
the python path for nova and a user can still install it if desired.
-S
_
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
> Please ignore the first clause of that email as it appears the message was
> indeed received.
> I still feel there is discussion about this (novatools) going on in the
> novatools thread.
Yes, no doubt. Both of these threads are about novatools
Please ignore the first clause of that email as it appears the message was
indeed received.
I still feel there is discussion about this (novatools) going on in the
novatools thread.
--andy
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Looking at https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/thre
Looking at https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/threads.html I see a
few posts from you, but they all complain about the list missing
messages from you. Not sure what the issue is. Seems replies from
everyone but you are working just fine.
-jay
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
Unless the mailing lists are being even crazier than I think, I don't
believe anybody has addressed any of the concerns I brought up in the
novatools thread.
Am I missing a set of emails or have you?
--andy
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Sa
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
> Hmm, that's a little tricky since oscompute will be contain the cmdline tool
> and the client tool to the REST API (cmdline is just a shell interface over
> the client). It would mean splitting things up and the setup.py would get
> complica
Hmm, that's a little tricky since oscompute will be contain the cmdline tool
and the client tool to the REST API (cmdline is just a shell interface over the
client). It would mean splitting things up and the setup.py would get
complicated.
To Eric's point
.../clients/python/*
.../clients/ruby/
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
> Yup, this looks like the "super tool" that jay was talking of earlier (odd
> too, since that's something I'm using accused of being)
>
> I kind of like it as well, since it permits swift, nova and glance to have
> their own client tools, but
Yup, this looks like the "super tool" that jay was talking of earlier (odd too,
since that's something I'm using accused of being)
I kind of like it as well, since it permits swift, nova and glance to have
their own client tools, but fit within the larger umbrella (and
tab-completion/hints wor
9 matches
Mail list logo
