Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-15 Thread Robbie Williamson
On 03/14/2012 11:42 AM, David Kranz wrote:
 In case any one runs into this, there is a bug in the Precise upstart
 package that causes a reboot after installing essex to result in a
 kernel panic. I don't know exactly what in the openstack install process
 triggers it but there is a PPA mentioned in comment #11 of this bug
 ticket that fixes the problem after upgrading the upstart package:
 
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/935585
 
Thanks David, I'll see about getting the fixed version properly into
Precise.

-Robbie

-- 
Robbie Williamson rob...@ubuntu.com
robbiew[irc.freenode.net]

Don't make me angry...you wouldn't like me when I'm angry.
 -Bruce Banner

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-15 Thread Robbie Williamson
On 03/15/2012 10:17 AM, Robbie Williamson wrote:
 On 03/14/2012 11:42 AM, David Kranz wrote:
 In case any one runs into this, there is a bug in the Precise upstart
 package that causes a reboot after installing essex to result in a
 kernel panic. I don't know exactly what in the openstack install process
 triggers it but there is a PPA mentioned in comment #11 of this bug
 ticket that fixes the problem after upgrading the upstart package:

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/935585

 Thanks David, I'll see about getting the fixed version properly into
 Precise.
 
FYI, I checked with our upstart maintainer and the fix should arrive in
Precise by tomorrow, Monday at the latest.

-Robbie



___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-14 Thread Kevin Jackson
Shep,
Those steps are great. I'll be running through them, the devstack and any
other info I've collated and update the bug I originally raised that caused
me the pain that tipped me over the edge (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/953989)

Adam, the other bugs raised in the last day regarding my issues where
raised by jaypipes when helping me troubleshoot my install :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/954089 and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/954087

Regards,

Kev

On 14 March 2012 01:59, Justin Shepherd jshep...@rackspace.com wrote:

  Sent this to kevin earlier, thought i would throw it out to the list..
 here are the steps i take to get a working keystone and glance on
 Ubuntu-12.04 using the ubuntu packages.

  http://paste.openstack.org/show/9101/

  These steps produce a working keystone and glance.. not 100% sure they
 are the most efficient steps, would be curious to hear from others if there
 is a better way.

  --shep


  On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Adam Gandelman wrote:

  On 03/13/2012 01:53 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote:

 Whilst OpenStack is being developed, a lot of people's entry into
 OpenStack is through deb packages (or insert your fave package management
 in here) - therefore Ubuntu becomes unofficial (but vocal) PR to
 OpenStack.  If the Ubuntu debs don't install, it becomes Plan B to install
 from somewhere else - even if that somewhere else is openstack.org.  When
 we view the pages of http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud there is little doubt
 that OpenStack is a 1st class citizen (Best-of-breed cloud infrastructure
 is built into every copy of Ubuntu).


 Kevin-

 As someone who helps maintain the Ubuntu packages, I'm curious to know
 when/what/where the problems you've hit installing packages. Do/did bug #s
 exist?  Can you please file bugs when you hit them?  We've been making an
 extra effort to ensure that the Openstack packages on archive.ubuntu.comare 
 *at least* installable without error at any given time.  Packaging bugs
 have slipped through into our weekly uploads, but we've been either
 catching them early or responding to any new relevant bug reports, and
 doing point uploads with fixes ASAP so things are installable until the
 next weekly upload.

 I ask  anyone that is running into packaging problems: Please file bugs
 against the Ubuntu packages if you find they are failing to install.  They
 *will* get fixed!


 Adam

  ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp





-- 
Kevin Jackson
@itarchitectkev
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-14 Thread Joseph Heck
Those were great bugs too - sorry you hit them, but thanks to you and Jay for 
reporting them in! We're working on them now!

-joe

On Mar 14, 2012, at 1:45 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
 Shep,
 Those steps are great. I'll be running through them, the devstack and any 
 other info I've collated and update the bug I originally raised that caused 
 me the pain that tipped me over the edge 
 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/953989)
 
 Adam, the other bugs raised in the last day regarding my issues where raised 
 by jaypipes when helping me troubleshoot my install : 
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/954089 and 
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/954087
 
 Regards,
 
 Kev
 
 On 14 March 2012 01:59, Justin Shepherd jshep...@rackspace.com wrote:
 Sent this to kevin earlier, thought i would throw it out to the list.. here 
 are the steps i take to get a working keystone and glance on Ubuntu-12.04 
 using the ubuntu packages.
 
 http://paste.openstack.org/show/9101/
 
 These steps produce a working keystone and glance.. not 100% sure they are 
 the most efficient steps, would be curious to hear from others if there is a 
 better way.
 
 --shep
 
 
 On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Adam Gandelman wrote:
 
 On 03/13/2012 01:53 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
 Whilst OpenStack is being developed, a lot of people's entry into OpenStack 
 is through deb packages (or insert your fave package management in here) 
 - therefore Ubuntu becomes unofficial (but vocal) PR to OpenStack.  If the 
 Ubuntu debs don't install, it becomes Plan B to install from somewhere else 
 - even if that somewhere else is openstack.org.  When we view the pages of 
 http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud there is little doubt that OpenStack is a 1st 
 class citizen (Best-of-breed cloud infrastructure is built into every copy 
 of Ubuntu).
 
 Kevin-
 
 As someone who helps maintain the Ubuntu packages, I'm curious to know 
 when/what/where the problems you've hit installing packages. Do/did bug #s 
 exist?  Can you please file bugs when you hit them?  We've been making an 
 extra effort to ensure that the Openstack packages on archive.ubuntu.com are 
 *at least* installable without error at any given time.  Packaging bugs have 
 slipped through into our weekly uploads, but we've been either catching them 
 early or responding to any new relevant bug reports, and doing point uploads 
 with fixes ASAP so things are installable until the next weekly upload.  
 
 I ask  anyone that is running into packaging problems: Please file bugs 
 against the Ubuntu packages if you find they are failing to install.  They 
 *will* get fixed!
 
 
 Adam
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Kevin Jackson
 @itarchitectkev
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-14 Thread David Kranz
In case any one runs into this, there is a bug in the Precise upstart 
package that causes a reboot after installing essex to result in a 
kernel panic. I don't know exactly what in the openstack install process 
triggers it but there is a PPA mentioned in comment #11 of this bug 
ticket that fixes the problem after upgrading the upstart package:


https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/935585

 -David

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-14 Thread Anne Gentle
Hi Shep and others -
A couple of questions to enhance my understanding while I walk through this
for the install doc.

Service Tenant - do you create just one service tenant to enclose all the
service users?

Glance Service User - do you create a Nova Service User and a Swift Service
User also?

files/default_catalog.templates - are your commands updating the template
or a database? It this is a point of confusion. I guess I have to also add:
[catalog]
driver = keystone.catalog.backends.sql.Catalog

to keystone.conf in order to use a database backend for my service catalog?
Thanks for improving my mind map.

Anne

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Justin Shepherd jshep...@rackspace.comwrote:

  Sent this to kevin earlier, thought i would throw it out to the list..
 here are the steps i take to get a working keystone and glance on
 Ubuntu-12.04 using the ubuntu packages.

  http://paste.openstack.org/show/9101/

  These steps produce a working keystone and glance.. not 100% sure they
 are the most efficient steps, would be curious to hear from others if there
 is a better way.

  --shep


  On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Adam Gandelman wrote:

  On 03/13/2012 01:53 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote:

 Whilst OpenStack is being developed, a lot of people's entry into
 OpenStack is through deb packages (or insert your fave package management
 in here) - therefore Ubuntu becomes unofficial (but vocal) PR to
 OpenStack.  If the Ubuntu debs don't install, it becomes Plan B to install
 from somewhere else - even if that somewhere else is openstack.org.  When
 we view the pages of http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud there is little doubt
 that OpenStack is a 1st class citizen (Best-of-breed cloud infrastructure
 is built into every copy of Ubuntu).


 Kevin-

 As someone who helps maintain the Ubuntu packages, I'm curious to know
 when/what/where the problems you've hit installing packages. Do/did bug #s
 exist?  Can you please file bugs when you hit them?  We've been making an
 extra effort to ensure that the Openstack packages on archive.ubuntu.comare 
 *at least* installable without error at any given time.  Packaging bugs
 have slipped through into our weekly uploads, but we've been either
 catching them early or responding to any new relevant bug reports, and
 doing point uploads with fixes ASAP so things are installable until the
 next weekly upload.

 I ask  anyone that is running into packaging problems: Please file bugs
 against the Ubuntu packages if you find they are failing to install.  They
 *will* get fixed!


 Adam

  ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-14 Thread Justin Shepherd

On Mar 14, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:

Hi Shep and others -
A couple of questions to enhance my understanding while I walk through this for 
the install doc.

Service Tenant - do you create just one service tenant to enclose all the 
service users?

Glance Service User - do you create a Nova Service User and a Swift Service 
User also?

files/default_catalog.templates - are your commands updating the template or a 
database? It this is a point of confusion. I guess I have to also add:
[catalog]
driver = keystone.catalog.backends.sql.Catalog


to keystone.conf in order to use a database backend for my service catalog?

Thanks for improving my mind map.

Anne

Anne,

I based the service tenant off what is done in devstack.. and it creates one 
service tenant that encloses all the service users.

Yes, i also create a nova and swift user that is part of the service tenant 
(also based on what is being done in devstack). In the example i set the name 
and password the same, but i generate separate passwords for each in actual 
deployments.

As for the default_catalog.templates, I am not making use of that file in any 
way. I am creating endpoints from the command line/api which populates the 
service catalog.. To be honest I also find this file confusing, and do not 
understand why or how you use it.

--shep


On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Justin Shepherd 
jshep...@rackspace.commailto:jshep...@rackspace.com wrote:
Sent this to kevin earlier, thought i would throw it out to the list.. here are 
the steps i take to get a working keystone and glance on Ubuntu-12.04 using the 
ubuntu packages.

http://paste.openstack.org/show/9101/

These steps produce a working keystone and glance.. not 100% sure they are the 
most efficient steps, would be curious to hear from others if there is a better 
way.

--shep


On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Adam Gandelman wrote:

On 03/13/2012 01:53 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
Whilst OpenStack is being developed, a lot of people's entry into OpenStack is 
through deb packages (or insert your fave package management in here) - 
therefore Ubuntu becomes unofficial (but vocal) PR to OpenStack.  If the Ubuntu 
debs don't install, it becomes Plan B to install from somewhere else - even if 
that somewhere else is openstack.orghttp://openstack.org/.  When we view the 
pages of http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud there is little doubt that OpenStack is a 
1st class citizen (Best-of-breed cloud infrastructure is built into every copy 
of Ubuntu).

Kevin-

As someone who helps maintain the Ubuntu packages, I'm curious to know 
when/what/where the problems you've hit installing packages. Do/did bug #s 
exist?  Can you please file bugs when you hit them?  We've been making an extra 
effort to ensure that the Openstack packages on 
archive.ubuntu.comhttp://archive.ubuntu.com/ are *at least* installable 
without error at any given time.  Packaging bugs have slipped through into our 
weekly uploads, but we've been either catching them early or responding to any 
new relevant bug reports, and doing point uploads with fixes ASAP so things are 
installable until the next weekly upload.

I ask  anyone that is running into packaging problems: Please file bugs against 
the Ubuntu packages if you find they are failing to install.  They *will* get 
fixed!


Adam

___
Mailing list: 
https://launchpad.net/~openstackhttps://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
Post to : 
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : 
https://launchpad.net/~openstackhttps://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: 
https://launchpad.net/~openstackhttps://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
Post to : 
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : 
https://launchpad.net/~openstackhttps://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-14 Thread Joseph Heck
Yeah, one service tenant, and then service accounts for each of nova, glance, 
quantum, swift. I've got a review that's updating this detail in the keystone 
docs right now (https://review.openstack.org/#change,5348)

The catalog can be either the template (in which case, you don't use commands, 
you just edit the template) or the SQL based catalog (where you do use the 
commands)

-joe


On Mar 14, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
 Hi Shep and others - 
 A couple of questions to enhance my understanding while I walk through this 
 for the install doc.
 
 Service Tenant - do you create just one service tenant to enclose all the 
 service users?
 
 Glance Service User - do you create a Nova Service User and a Swift Service 
 User also?
 
 files/default_catalog.templates - are your commands updating the template or 
 a database? It this is a point of confusion. I guess I have to also add:
 [catalog]
 driver = keystone.catalog.backends.sql.Catalog
 
 to keystone.conf in order to use a database backend for my service catalog?
 
 Thanks for improving my mind map.
 
 Anne
 
 On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Justin Shepherd jshep...@rackspace.com 
 wrote:
 Sent this to kevin earlier, thought i would throw it out to the list.. here 
 are the steps i take to get a working keystone and glance on Ubuntu-12.04 
 using the ubuntu packages.
 
 http://paste.openstack.org/show/9101/
 
 These steps produce a working keystone and glance.. not 100% sure they are 
 the most efficient steps, would be curious to hear from others if there is a 
 better way.
 
 --shep
 
 
 On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Adam Gandelman wrote:
 
 On 03/13/2012 01:53 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
 Whilst OpenStack is being developed, a lot of people's entry into OpenStack 
 is through deb packages (or insert your fave package management in here) 
 - therefore Ubuntu becomes unofficial (but vocal) PR to OpenStack.  If the 
 Ubuntu debs don't install, it becomes Plan B to install from somewhere else 
 - even if that somewhere else is openstack.org.  When we view the pages of 
 http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud there is little doubt that OpenStack is a 1st 
 class citizen (Best-of-breed cloud infrastructure is built into every copy 
 of Ubuntu).
 
 Kevin-
 
 As someone who helps maintain the Ubuntu packages, I'm curious to know 
 when/what/where the problems you've hit installing packages. Do/did bug #s 
 exist?  Can you please file bugs when you hit them?  We've been making an 
 extra effort to ensure that the Openstack packages on archive.ubuntu.com are 
 *at least* installable without error at any given time.  Packaging bugs have 
 slipped through into our weekly uploads, but we've been either catching them 
 early or responding to any new relevant bug reports, and doing point uploads 
 with fixes ASAP so things are installable until the next weekly upload.  
 
 I ask  anyone that is running into packaging problems: Please file bugs 
 against the Ubuntu packages if you find they are failing to install.  They 
 *will* get fixed!
 
 
 Adam
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-13 Thread Kevin Jackson
Cheers Padraig - I'll grab a Fedora install and compare notes.
I guess if Fedora has an installation candidate, the problem is probably
Ubuntu packaging - at least I can direct my issues at Ubuntu rather than
OpenStack as a whole...

Kev


2012/3/13 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com

 On 03/13/2012 09:28 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
  Dear all,
  I had my first sleepless night last night after a conversation I had in
 work regarding an OpenStack installation.

  Are my problems OpenStack's or Ubuntu's packaging?  I would love to
 speak to someone who has this running and direct my questions to the right
 place.
  My aim is simple: I want a running OpenStack environment.

 I'm not familiar with ubuntu's packaging, but to allay your
 fears about openstack itself, we've recently had a successful Fedora
 test day testing out various functionality of Essex milestone 4
 including the new keystone.  I'm not suggesting you switch or
 anything, but you might be able to copy some of the configuration
 etc. from the steps detailed at:

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-08_OpenStack_Test_Day

 cheers,
 Pádraig.


-- 
Kevin Jackson
@itarchitectkev
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-13 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
Hi Kevin,

As others have said, I can only speak to what I'm familiar with ( the
Managed I.T. packages).

They should be fairly up-to-date, there has been very few bugfixes to the
stable branch that I'm aware of since I last updated the packages.

Re EC2 compatibility, they are as compatible as the Diablo release is - ie
it works fine for the vast majority of API calls. Are there any specific
issues you were having?

Anyway, Essex might be approaching the RC phase, but that doesn't mean the
various packages are! The packages will always take longer..

For Essex, DevStack on 11.10 is going to be the most reliable *test*
install and Ubuntu 12.04 *will be* the most reliable  (Ubuntu based)
production install IMO.

(Sorry for the top post, on my mobile!)

Thanks,
Kiall

Sent from my phone.
On Mar 13, 2012 9:30 a.m., Kevin Jackson ke...@linuxservices.co.uk
wrote:

 Dear all,
 I had my first sleepless night last night after a conversation I had in
 work regarding an OpenStack installation.  We are a planning an OpenStack
 install but I've failed to demonstrate OpenStack running in our environment
 and yet packages are now being tagged up with RC.  As big a supporter as I
 am, I'm struggling with the justifications when I have nothing tangible to
 show.  The real questions are being posed to me on why we're looking at
 OpenStack and not CloudStack or Eucalyptus - they have installations that
 we can turn to.  I was hoping Essex would help answer these questions
 relatively simply, but the opposite has happened - I am struggling to get
 OpenStack Essex working under Ubuntu - 11.10 and 12.04.  There are a few
 issues I am hoping the community can address:

 1) What is the preferred/recommended version of OpenStack to install if
 we're looking at production (and lets say production involves a plan of
 running a number of instances of a low impact application somewhere in the
 next few months - if there are a few bugs, that's ok).
 2) What is the preferred/recommended Linux Distribution to install this on?

 OpenStack is  fast approaching RC status.  Release Candidate to me means
 that its nearly ready, but there could be some bugs that haven't been
 raised yet.  I haven't had a working Essex since Essex-1 - it isn't a
 release candidate for me.

 I have tried the following package/scripted installations:

 1) Ubuntu 11.10 with Diablo (Nova PPA) - some degree of success - failures
 around Keystone and EC2 API
 2) Ubuntu 11.10 with Managedit PPA - better degree of success, but no
 EC2 compatibility and some bug fixes not back-ported
 3) Ubuntu 12.04 (various releases) with Ubuntu packages - no success apart
 from getting Keystone to do some things, but failing to get services to use
 Keystone.
 4) Ubuntu 11.10 with Devstack (tried yesterday - unfortunately failed
 [specific reason escapes me, I'll try another install today, but was around
 nova compute failing to start])

 I nearly got 12.04 working with Essex but then Keystone changed to
 Keystone light.  This also raised concerns with us that between Essex-3 and
 Essex-4 something as fundamental as Keystone changed and ever since then
 has formed the crux of my problems.
 It doesn't help that the documentation @ 
 http://keystone.openstack.org/differs from
 http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/install/content/identity-configure-keystone.html.
  I also see conflicting advice on where Keystone fits - not only is the
 documentation different depending on where you enter the websites/search
 but even the Forum has Keystone mentioned under Futurestack.  Is Keystone
 pinnacle to an Essex release?

 I even tried the devstack method of installation thinking this should be
 the safest option and this failed.  I'll try this again though to help here
 rather than just say it failed.  On looking at how Keystone is implemented,
 I see differences in configuration which I'm unsure what they are (e.g. the
 service catalog - devstack has a text based catalog and referenced directly
 in keystone.conf, Ubuntu's are SQL based - on trying the devstack config,
 Keystone fails to start under Ubuntu 12.04 for example).  I also noticed
 the nova.conf in devstack differs wildly in format to that of Ubuntu
 following the format for the rest of the configs - is this something nova
 is moving to?

 Now I'm pretty sure that OpenStack hasn't got RC status without it running
 in other people's environments - so I'd just love for you to share your
 details on how you have done this.  Is it all pull from source, install
 from source?  If that's the case - that's great as it means I can use the
 software, but it wouldn't be something I'd be doing in production on a
 modest number of machines - so the installation must come from packages
 eventually, somehow.

 Are my problems OpenStack's or Ubuntu's packaging?  I would love to speak
 to someone who has this running and direct my questions to the right place.
  My aim is simple: I want a running OpenStack environment.

 I appreciate 

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-13 Thread andi abes
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Kevin Jackson
ke...@linuxservices.co.uk wrote:
 Hi Andi,
 Sure - the methods aren't meant for automated production installs, but to
 get to a world where I can automate using Orchestra or variations on PXE
 booting,

Well.. setting up a distributed system where all the pieces connect,
is a bit more complex than a sequence of PXE boots, as the reminder of
your post identifies ;)


I first need to get to a world where a manual install works.
 I was getting desperate in having a demonstration available to those that
 pay my wages - the best candidate I had here were Kiall's managedit repo.
  Great work (really), but it wouldn't have been anything to be considered
 for production for obvious reasons.

 I looked at Crowbar a few months back and tried to persevere with it, but it
 was very very clunky and not very friendly to use.  I couldn't customise it
 to my network requirements - which aren't anything out of the ordinary, but
 I needed customisation like VLAN IDs, etc.  The docs pointed to editing
 Barclamps.

You can look at it as add complexity, but the layer that crowbar adds
on top of the core packages is meant to solve the set of problems that
go beyond installing a single node. Like ensuring that the right nodes
end up on the right vlan and use the right gateway for that logical
network.

I would be interested to hear privately more about what you found
confusing and complex. And I'd admit that we've made strides in
publishing more guides, videos and advice (and heard pretty good
feedback).

An added complexity which I don't believe is necessary in a
 world where PXE booting an OS is simple and package installation is even
 simpler.  The crux of the challenge I need to solve is just OpenStack
 configuration but documentation lags development (naturally - not
 criticising) and comparing like-for-like hasn't worked for me (e.g. devstack
 configs are completely different to what, say, Ubuntu deb packages expect).


exactly. One thing to note though is that your comparison is not quite
fair. Package managers do a great job in installing a single machine.
They're not meant, nor really capable to deploy clusters of machines
without some layer of orchestration. I think that's actually your
expectation from the top of the email.

From personal experience - to develop crowbar, I find myself reading
more .py files than .html/txt files... that's the world of agile
software development. If you want to take on orchestrating an
openstack deployment - I can share some good python resources.


 Given Canonical's backing of OpenStack I thought I was in good company.
  After I've a working setup of installing Ubuntu onto a few nodes the next
 natural step would be to use Orchestra (or Cobbler itself which we currently
 use).


To be fair, canonical has been working on JUJU as a layer on top of
packages, to... orchestrate deployments.

 The issue I have is that all the components are installed without out error.

package installed is not equal to cluster deployed... sorry, just had
to hammer than nail.

  I come to use it and keystone doesn't want to play ball with the other
 components.
 This leads me to believe it can be two things: misconfiguration or bugs.

 If its misconfiguration - excellent - I can fix that today if someone shares
 a script or steps to configure Keystone Light to work with the rest of the
 environment.

Assuming you're chef savvy, this might be useful:
https://github.com/dellcloudedge/barclamp-keystone/tree/release/essex-hack/master/chef/cookbooks/keystone


 In the meantime I'm assuming bugs as I'm not getting anywhere fast with what
 I currently *think* are the correct steps.



 Cheers,

 Kev

 On 13 March 2012 11:27, andi abes andi.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Kevin, sorry for the hard time you're having.
 However, most of the methods you described, are NOT meant for
 production deployments (not saying all, because I haven't tried
 them all).
 You might want to look at projects which aim to automate production
 deployments.
 I can point you to the one I'm working on (The diablo release is in
 production in many installations,  The essex series is abit nascent,
 but pretty far along). It's here [1]
 You can also download ISO's from [2]
 (the crowbar mailing list is here [3], so you can see what folks have
 said, and check the wiki here [4])

 hope you have a more successful experience.


 [1] http://github.com/dellcloudedge/crowbar
 [2] http://crowbar.zehicle.com
 [3] https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar
 [4] http://github.com/dellcloudedge/crowbar/wiki


 On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Kevin Jackson
 ke...@linuxservices.co.uk wrote:
  Cheers Padraig - I'll grab a Fedora install and compare notes.
  I guess if Fedora has an installation candidate, the problem is probably
  Ubuntu packaging - at least I can direct my issues at Ubuntu rather than
  OpenStack as a whole...
 
  Kev
 
 
  2012/3/13 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com
 
  On 

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-13 Thread Kevin Jackson
Thanks a lot for the points Andi (and the links), but not to stray away
from my original post: I don't want complexity at this stage - I want a
single server that works.  I haven't even got that.
I had a multi node set up working (to some degree of butchery) of an early
Essex-1 release using Orchestra, PXE booting and doing appropriate
post-configuration, if a little bit of a hack.  We're a modest size digital
hosting environment - introducing alternative PXE booting and config
management systems ontop of something that is already causing us pain isn't
something we're looking at right now.  Given a fairly slick PXE boot
environment already across multiple datacentres of the rest of our kit
means we can move to using this for OpenStack.  That's an aside - I
mentioned prod, but not confuse a way of rolling this out in our
datacentres.

The issues stem from a basic install.  I'd love to chat about bare-metal
provisioning issues as it means I've got OpenStack running.  I haven't.
 Yet.
I've raised a bug just now (https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/953989)
which might shed light on my issues as it's possible its not a bug, but
process/config issue.  This would be great to hear as it means there's an
easy fix.
Given that keystone underpins the rest of the environment means that my
frustrations could be solved.

Cheers,

Kev

On 13 March 2012 12:42, andi abes andi.a...@gmail.com wrote:


 I first need to get to a world where a manual install works.
  I was getting desperate in having a demonstration available to those that
  pay my wages - the best candidate I had here were Kiall's managedit repo.
   Great work (really), but it wouldn't have been anything to be considered
  for production for obvious reasons.

-- 
Kevin Jackson
@itarchitectkev
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-13 Thread Kevin Jackson
Adam (and others I've not instantly replied to),
Thanks for the reply.  I understand that OpenStack (moving target) on
Ubuntu (moving target) is no mean feat, but I no doubt expect a lot of
people are in the same boat as me.  Ubuntu (and other distros) have set a
certain level of expectation for installation of applications.  Whilst
OpenStack is being developed, a lot of people's entry into OpenStack is
through deb packages (or insert your fave package management in here) -
therefore Ubuntu becomes unofficial (but vocal) PR to OpenStack.  If the
Ubuntu debs don't install, it becomes Plan B to install from somewhere else
- even if that somewhere else is openstack.org.  When we view the pages of
http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud there is little doubt that OpenStack is a 1st
class citizen (Best-of-breed cloud infrastructure is built into every copy
of Ubuntu).

Adam, your email is very beneficial and very much appreciated.  Ubuntu
12.04 LTS still seems a logical installation choice and its a release we've
been waiting for.  I'm going to say that from the little guy (who are
numerous and less vocal).  Orchestra and Juju was always on the cards at
some point for me.

This email thread has actually turned frustration into optimism again.  I
might actually break out into a smile...  The support has been nothing
short of exceptional.
The key thing though is that OpenStack does work and people (a lot of
people) want to make it work.  Of course I'll be happier once I have a
working installation again.
Today has seen a couple of bugs come out the woodwork, and bugs in my own
methods.  Any positive to come out of this gets me (and, more importantly
to the community, everyone else who has felt equally frustrated) come
closer to an end product.

To everyone - thanks.  Think its going to be a large bar tab at this rate.

As an update, the crux of my issues seems to stem around the change to and
in keystone-light.  Whether the bugs raised today hint at this (both code
and user error), the difference between a working devstack deployment and
Ubuntu's seem possibly related to the catalog driver method (template file
vs sql).  Hopefully having a working devstack vs a Ubuntu 12.04 install
will clear this up.

Thanks once again.

Kev :)

On 13 March 2012 18:51, Adam Gandelman ad...@canonical.com wrote:


 Hey Kevin-

 Sorry to hear about your troubles.  I know I was similarly frustrated
 getting my feet wet with Openstack during the diablo / oneiric cycle.
  Without knowing details of every problem you've hit in your Ubuntu
 testing, its difficult to give you simple answers to get you up and going.
  I  can try to offer some assurances that I hope boost your perception of
 Openstack, specifically Openstack-on-Ubuntu.

 We're doing *a lot* of testing around Openstack.  If you need some proof
 that this stuff *actually works*, please see our Jenkins dashboard [1].
  Note that this testing takes place across a cluster of physical machines,
 not an all-in-one-virtual-machine.  There are several goals here:

  - ensure our packages correctly install the components onto the distro.
 [2]
  - ensure our Juju charms are kept up to date with the latest
 deployment-related configuration changes [3]
  - ensure Openstack still works [4]

 Assuming all of the above is still true, we upload a weekly snapshot of
 Essex (all components) into the Ubuntu archive every Friday.  This upload
 contains a weeks worth of packaging updates, configuration changes and bug
 fixes.  The end goal here is to help make testing the development release
 of Openstack on the development release of Ubuntu a stable yet
 bleeding-edge experience.  That said, Openstack is still very much a moving
 target.  Lots of things change in a weeks time--as evidenced by the
 Keystone Lite migration, among other things.  Unfortunately, documentation
 tends to lag behind (if it exists at all).

 I'll be the first to admit that none of this stuff is easy.  Unless you or
 your CI robots are spending a good deal of the day tracking upstream
 development across all components, getting close-to-trunk Openstack running
 is an extremely daunting task.  Speaking for Ubuntu, I expect we'll have
 documentation added to the Server Guide or elsewhere as the Essex cycle
 draws to a close and we know *exactly* what we're shipping in Precise.
  Until then, we certainly appreciate your patience, testing and any bug
 reports can you supply.

 -Adam

 PS: If you're interested in Juju or how this is all deployed and
 orchestrated, please see the Juju stuff at the tail end of the deployment
 test run [3].


 Some links to automated builds, deploys and tests of Essex on Precise as
 of this morning:
 [1] 
 https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/**view/Precise%20OpenStack%**20Testing/https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Precise%20OpenStack%20Testing/
 [2] https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/**view/Precise%20OpenStack%**
 

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-13 Thread Joshua Harlow
Just my 2 cents.

Shouldn't openstack be dependent only on a known set of package versions and 
not a distro?

It seems like it should be the job of openstack to define those versions and 
let the distro's match that as they choice.

If 12.04 matches these versions, then it should work, if something else matches 
these versions then that's fine also.

That would make me happy, and is sort of what devstackPY is doing right now 
(defining that concrete list).

That list seems like it should be maintained elsewhere though (and devstackPY 
should just reference it - ie the master list from a url or something).

On 3/13/12 1:53 PM, Kevin Jackson ke...@linuxservices.co.uk wrote:

Adam (and others I've not instantly replied to),
Thanks for the reply.  I understand that OpenStack (moving target) on Ubuntu 
(moving target) is no mean feat, but I no doubt expect a lot of people are in 
the same boat as me.  Ubuntu (and other distros) have set a certain level of 
expectation for installation of applications.  Whilst OpenStack is being 
developed, a lot of people's entry into OpenStack is through deb packages (or 
insert your fave package management in here) - therefore Ubuntu becomes 
unofficial (but vocal) PR to OpenStack.  If the Ubuntu debs don't install, it 
becomes Plan B to install from somewhere else - even if that somewhere else is 
openstack.org http://openstack.org .  When we view the pages of 
http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud there is little doubt that OpenStack is a 1st class 
citizen (Best-of-breed cloud infrastructure is built into every copy of Ubuntu).

Adam, your email is very beneficial and very much appreciated.  Ubuntu 12.04 
LTS still seems a logical installation choice and its a release we've been 
waiting for.  I'm going to say that from the little guy (who are numerous and 
less vocal).  Orchestra and Juju was always on the cards at some point for me.

This email thread has actually turned frustration into optimism again.  I might 
actually break out into a smile...  The support has been nothing short of 
exceptional.
The key thing though is that OpenStack does work and people (a lot of people) 
want to make it work.  Of course I'll be happier once I have a working 
installation again.
Today has seen a couple of bugs come out the woodwork, and bugs in my own 
methods.  Any positive to come out of this gets me (and, more importantly to 
the community, everyone else who has felt equally frustrated) come closer to an 
end product.

To everyone - thanks.  Think its going to be a large bar tab at this rate.

As an update, the crux of my issues seems to stem around the change to and in 
keystone-light.  Whether the bugs raised today hint at this (both code and user 
error), the difference between a working devstack deployment and Ubuntu's seem 
possibly related to the catalog driver method (template file vs sql).  
Hopefully having a working devstack vs a Ubuntu 12.04 install will clear this 
up.

Thanks once again.

Kev :)

On 13 March 2012 18:51, Adam Gandelman ad...@canonical.com wrote:

Hey Kevin-

Sorry to hear about your troubles.  I know I was similarly frustrated getting 
my feet wet with Openstack during the diablo / oneiric cycle.  Without knowing 
details of every problem you've hit in your Ubuntu testing, its difficult to 
give you simple answers to get you up and going.  I  can try to offer some 
assurances that I hope boost your perception of Openstack, specifically 
Openstack-on-Ubuntu.

We're doing *a lot* of testing around Openstack.  If you need some proof that 
this stuff *actually works*, please see our Jenkins dashboard [1].  Note that 
this testing takes place across a cluster of physical machines, not an 
all-in-one-virtual-machine.  There are several goals here:

  - ensure our packages correctly install the components onto the distro. [2]
  - ensure our Juju charms are kept up to date with the latest 
deployment-related configuration changes [3]
  - ensure Openstack still works [4]

Assuming all of the above is still true, we upload a weekly snapshot of Essex 
(all components) into the Ubuntu archive every Friday.  This upload contains a 
weeks worth of packaging updates, configuration changes and bug fixes.  The end 
goal here is to help make testing the development release of Openstack on the 
development release of Ubuntu a stable yet bleeding-edge experience.  That 
said, Openstack is still very much a moving target.  Lots of things change in a 
weeks time--as evidenced by the Keystone Lite migration, among other things.  
Unfortunately, documentation tends to lag behind (if it exists at all).

I'll be the first to admit that none of this stuff is easy.  Unless you or your 
CI robots are spending a good deal of the day tracking upstream development 
across all components, getting close-to-trunk Openstack running is an extremely 
daunting task.  Speaking for Ubuntu, I expect we'll have documentation added to 
the Server Guide or elsewhere as the Essex cycle draws to a close 

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-13 Thread Adam Gandelman

On 03/13/2012 01:53 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
Whilst OpenStack is being developed, a lot of people's entry into 
OpenStack is through deb packages (or insert your fave package 
management in here) - therefore Ubuntu becomes unofficial (but vocal) 
PR to OpenStack.  If the Ubuntu debs don't install, it becomes Plan B 
to install from somewhere else - even if that somewhere else is 
openstack.org http://openstack.org.  When we view the pages of 
http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud there is little doubt that OpenStack is a 
1st class citizen (Best-of-breed cloud infrastructure is built into 
every copy of Ubuntu).


Kevin-

As someone who helps maintain the Ubuntu packages, I'm curious to know 
when/what/where the problems you've hit installing packages. Do/did bug 
#s exist?  Can you please file bugs when you hit them?  We've been 
making an extra effort to ensure that the Openstack packages on 
archive.ubuntu.com are *at least* installable without error at any given 
time.  Packaging bugs have slipped through into our weekly uploads, but 
we've been either catching them early or responding to any new relevant 
bug reports, and doing point uploads with fixes ASAP so things are 
installable until the next weekly upload.


I ask  anyone that is running into packaging problems: Please file bugs 
against the Ubuntu packages if you find they are failing to install.  
They *will* get fixed!



Adam

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Installation Woes - Need re-assurance and help.

2012-03-13 Thread Justin Shepherd
Sent this to kevin earlier, thought i would throw it out to the list.. here are 
the steps i take to get a working keystone and glance on Ubuntu-12.04 using the 
ubuntu packages.

http://paste.openstack.org/show/9101/

These steps produce a working keystone and glance.. not 100% sure they are the 
most efficient steps, would be curious to hear from others if there is a better 
way.

--shep


On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Adam Gandelman wrote:

On 03/13/2012 01:53 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
Whilst OpenStack is being developed, a lot of people's entry into OpenStack is 
through deb packages (or insert your fave package management in here) - 
therefore Ubuntu becomes unofficial (but vocal) PR to OpenStack.  If the Ubuntu 
debs don't install, it becomes Plan B to install from somewhere else - even if 
that somewhere else is openstack.orghttp://openstack.org/.  When we view the 
pages of http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud there is little doubt that OpenStack is a 
1st class citizen (Best-of-breed cloud infrastructure is built into every copy 
of Ubuntu).

Kevin-

As someone who helps maintain the Ubuntu packages, I'm curious to know 
when/what/where the problems you've hit installing packages. Do/did bug #s 
exist?  Can you please file bugs when you hit them?  We've been making an extra 
effort to ensure that the Openstack packages on 
archive.ubuntu.comhttp://archive.ubuntu.com are *at least* installable 
without error at any given time.  Packaging bugs have slipped through into our 
weekly uploads, but we've been either catching them early or responding to any 
new relevant bug reports, and doing point uploads with fixes ASAP so things are 
installable until the next weekly upload.

I ask  anyone that is running into packaging problems: Please file bugs against 
the Ubuntu packages if you find they are failing to install.  They *will* get 
fixed!


Adam

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : 
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp