[Openstack] Openstack Log Errors monitoring

Hi, May i know if anyone is using any tool to monitor ERROR on all openstack logs and send out alerts? Thank you. Regards, Ron ___ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org

[Openstack] Domain not found error

Hi, I'm trying to install keystone for my swift cluster. I followed this document for install and configuration: https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/pike/install/ However, I'm getting this error for a command: # openstack user create --domain default --password-prompt swift The request you have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Re-Reminder on the state of WSME

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Michael Johnson wrote: I echo Ben's question about what is the recommended replacement. It's a good question. Unfortunately I don't have a good answer. My involvement in WSME is simply the result of submitting some bug fixes in early 2015 and there being no one to review

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet

On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:58:28 +0900, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2018-04-09 13:39:30 +1000: > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:41:07AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > > > > > My understanding of our use of upper constraints was that this should > > > (almost) always

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder and agenda tomorrows meeting

Hi everyone, Time for a new meeting for the Public Cloud WG. Forum sessions for Vancouver is priority of this meeting, would be nice to see as many of you there. Agenda can be found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg Feel free to add items to the agenda! See you all

[openstack-dev] [Elections][TC] Announcing Sean McGinnis candidacy for TC

Hey everyone, I am announcing my candidacy to continue on the OpenStack Technical Committee. I am employed by Huawei and lucky enough to have a full-time focus on OpenStack. I have been contributing since the Icehouse release. I served as Cinder PTL from Mitaka through Pike, and was elected to

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder and agenda tomorrows meeting

Hi everyone, Time for a new meeting for the Public Cloud WG. Forum sessions for Vancouver is priority of this meeting, would be nice to see as many of you there. Agenda can be found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg Feel free to add items to the agenda! See you all

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting April 11, 2018

Hi Team, Our weekly meeting starting from UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg as usual. The initial agenda is as follows: 1. Confirmation of new core reviewer promotion, 2. Critical Rocky Spec update and discussion 3. open patch discussion Please feel free to suggest new topics any time :) --

[openstack-dev] [Elections][TC] Announcing Rico Lin candidacy for TC

Dear all, I'd like to announce my candidacy for a seat on the OpenStack Technical Committee. I'm Rico Lin, employed by EasyStack, full-time OpenStacker. I have been in this community since 2014. And been deeply involved with technical contribution [1], mostly around Orchestration service which

[openstack-dev] [election] [tc] TC candidacy (but not for chair)

Hi everyone, Growing new leaders has been a focus of the Technical Committee over the last year: first discussed at the leadership workshop with Board members in March 2017, then included in the TC "vision for 2019"[1] adopted in June. As part of this objective, we actively looked for new

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] roadmap on containers workflow

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 at 20:51 Emilien Macchi wrote: > Greetings, > > Steve Baker and I had a quick chat today about the work that is being done > around containers workflow in Rocky cycle. > > If you're not familiar with the topic, I suggest to first read the > blueprint to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Re-Reminder on the state of WSME

On 11 April 2018 at 11:39, Chris Dent wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Michael Johnson wrote: > > I echo Ben's question about what is the recommended replacement. >> > > It's a good question. Unfortunately I don't have a good answer. My > involvement in WSME is simply the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet

sorry, I didn't see any solution for following error found in [1] I just rechecked the patch and is this kind of issue already fixed? ubuntu-xenial | Requirement for package eventlet : Requirement (package=u'eventlet', location='', specifiers='!=0.18.3,!=0.20.1,<0.21.0,>=0.18.2', markers=u'',

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic Bug Day on Thursday April 12th @ 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM (UTC)

Hey all, Ironic Bug Day is happening tomorrow, April 12th at 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM (UTC) We will be meeting on Julia's bluejeans line: https://bluejeans.com/5548595878 Hope to see everyone there! Thanks, Mike Turek __

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet

Excerpts from IWAMOTO Toshihiro's message of 2018-04-11 18:19:02 +0900: > On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:58:28 +0900, > Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2018-04-09 13:39:30 +1000: > > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:41:07AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > > > > > > > My

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Elections][TC] Announcing Rico Lin candidacy for TC

Forwarding to Openstack-operators -- Forwarded message -- From: Rico Lin Date: 2018-04-11 20:02 GMT+08:00 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Elections][TC] Announcing Rico Lin candidacy for TC To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Re-Reminder on the state of WSME

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Dougal Matthews wrote: I would like to see us move away from WSME. I'm not sure I have time to drive an effort in finding a replacement (and migration path) but I would certainly like to help. Dougal and I talked about this in IRC and agreed that being able to merge

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Changes toComputeVirtAPI.wait_for_instance_event

Jichen was able to use this information immediately, to great benefit [1]. (If those paying attention could have a quick look at that to make sure he used it right, it would be appreciated; I'm not an expert here.) [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527658/31..32/nova/virt/zvm/guest.py@192 On

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet

Excerpts from Chen CH Ji's message of 2018-04-11 21:09:29 +0800: > sorry, I didn't see any solution for following error found in [1] > I just rechecked the patch and is this kind of issue already fixed? > > ubuntu-xenial | Requirement for package eventlet : Requirement > (package=u'eventlet',

[OpenStack-Infra] Need an account to setup Lenovo Ironic CI

Hi, Lenovo has a driver in OpenStack Ironic since the Queens release. We need to start reporting as a 3rd party CI vendor by end of Rocky. This email is to request a service account to start reporting as a third party CI system. Please let us know if you need anything else from our side.

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Asking for comments on translate-dev.o.o auth table mismatch

> > According to his comment, it would be nice if Zanata manages openid full > url by separating > into domain part (e.g., "openstackid.org") and rest part (e.g., "/..."). > @Patrick, would it be possible to support in Zanata > as a new feature? As much as I would like to solve issue asap, I

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Asking for comments on translate-dev.o.o auth table mismatch

Hi Ian, Not every openID provider returns the identifier URL in such pattern. In fact it might not be URL at all (it just need to be unique to that provider). So technically Zanata won't be able to support the feature you proposed below. I think fresh database will work well and easier to

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Asking for comments on translate-dev.o.o auth table mismatch

Not only the password mismatch. The problem is username (among other things, e.g. the identifier url, name and email, are returned from openstackId authentication and can be changed by user then saved to Zanata) has to be unique in Zanata. Since the identifier values come from two different

[OpenStack-Infra] How to change the owner of a project?

Hello, I would like to know the official process of how to change the owner of a project owner. I am a committer of the networking-onos project, and I want to take over the project. Of course, ]the owner (maintainer) of the project agreed to that. Thank you, Sangho

[OpenStack-Infra] devstack-plugin-vmax-core

Hi there, I am trying to create a pike branch for the devstack-plugin-vmax plugin but am unable to create branches. Could I be given access to be able to do so? Thanks Kind Regards, Unana Okpoyo Software Senior Engineer Dell EMC | VMAX_UNISPHERE phone +353 21 494 6886

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] roadmap on containers workflow

On 04/11/2018 07:58 AM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 at 20:51 Emilien Macchi > wrote: Greetings, Steve Baker and I had a quick chat today about the work that is being done around containers workflow in Rocky cycle.

[openstack-dev] [rally] Moving OpenStack plugins into separate repo

Hi Stackers! Today I am happy to announce great news! >From a historical perspective, Rally is testing (benchmarking) tool for OpenStack, but it is changed. More and more users want to use Rally for different platforms and environments. Our pluggable system allows doing this. To make the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-04-11 12:20:46 -0400: > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2018-04-05 10:47:37 -0500: > > eventlet-0.22.1 has been out for a while now, we should try and use it. > > Going to be fun times. > > > > I have a review projects can depend upon if they

[openstack-dev] [FEMDC ]Kubernetes IoT Edge Working Group Proposal

Dear all, I’m not sure the information has been shared on the MLs. https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email_source=footer#!topic/kubernetes-dev/sAFIvDsvUCI Regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Changes toComputeVirtAPI.wait_for_instance_event

Looks good IMO. --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 11. Apr 2018, at 15:46, Eric Fried wrote: Jichen was able to use this information immediately, to great benefit [1]. (If those paying attention could have a quick look at that to make sure he used it right, it would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet

Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2018-04-05 10:47:37 -0500: > eventlet-0.22.1 has been out for a while now, we should try and use it. > Going to be fun times. > > I have a review projects can depend upon if they wish to test. > https://review.openstack.org/533021 I have proposed a bunch

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

Hi Ian, do you have any insight into the availability of a physical environment for the ARM64 cloud? I’m curious, as there may be a need for downstream testing, which I would assume will want to make use of our existing OSP CI framework. Thanks! Frank Frank Jansen Senior Manager |

[openstack-dev] [election] [tc] TC candidacy for cdent

Hi, I'm announcing my candidacy to continue as a member of the Technical Committee. When I ran a year ago, one of my goals was to foster more, and more transparent, communication among the many parts of the OpenStack community. The TC has made progress by being more overt and intentional in

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic Bug Day on Thursday April 12th @ 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM (UTC)

Sorry this is so late but as for the format of the event I think we should do something like this: 1) Go through new bugs     -This is doable in storyboard. Sort by creation date     -Should be a nice warm up activity! 2) Go through oldest bugs     -Again, doable in storyboard. Sort by last

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] How to change the owner of a project?

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018, at 8:56 PM, Sangho Shin wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to know the official process of how to change the owner of > a project owner. > I am a committer of the networking-onos project, and I want to take over > the project. Of course, ]the owner (maintainer) of the

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Need an account to setup Lenovo Ironic CI

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Rushil Chugh1 wrote: > Hi, > > Lenovo has a driver in OpenStack Ironic since the Queens release. We > need to start reporting as a 3rd party CI vendor by end of Rocky. This > email is to request a service account to start reporting as a third > party CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally] Moving OpenStack plugins into separate repo

Andrey, Great news! Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > Hi Stackers! > > Today I am happy to announce great news! > > From a historical perspective, Rally is testing (benchmarking) tool for > OpenStack, but it is

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] devstack-plugin-vmax-core

On 2018-01-09 15:59, Okpoyo, Unana wrote: > Hi there, > >   > > I am trying to create a pike branch for the devstack-plugin-vmax plugin > but am unable to create branches. Could I be given access to be able to > do so? Please sent a patch to update the ACL file, see

[openstack-dev] [horizon][plugins] Improve Horizon testing

Hi all, Let me introduce my proposal about Horizon testing improvements[1]. We started this discussion at the last PTG [2] and had a good conversation at the previous meeting [3]. The idea is simple: to have CI that verifies Horizon changes across supported plugins. As a side-effect of this

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Asking for comments on translate-dev.o.o auth table mismatch

On Jan 10, 2018, at 6:05 PM, Patrick Huang wrote: Not only the password mismatch. The problem is username (among other things, e.g. the identifier url, name and email, are returned from openstackId authentication and can be changed by user then saved to Zanata) has to be

[Openstack-operators] [Nova][Deployers] Optional, platform specific, dependancies in requirements.txt

Hi, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523387 proposes adding a z/VM specific dependancy to nova's requirements.txt. When I objected the counter argument is that we have examples of windows specific dependancies (os-win) and powervm specific dependancies in that file already. I think perhaps all

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] roadmap on containers workflow

On 12/04/18 00:58, Wesley Hayutin wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 at 20:51 Emilien Macchi > wrote: Greetings, Steve Baker and I had a quick chat today about the work that is being done around containers workflow in Rocky cycle.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Deployers] Optional, platform specific, dependancies in requirements.txt

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, at 3:09 PM, Michael Still wrote: > Hi, > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523387 proposes adding a z/VM specific > dependancy to nova's requirements.txt. When I objected the counter argument > is that we have examples of windows specific dependancies (os-win) and > powervm

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] roadmap on containers workflow

On 11/04/18 12:50, Emilien Macchi wrote: Greetings, Steve Baker and I had a quick chat today about the work that is being done around containers workflow in Rocky cycle. If you're not familiar with the topic, I suggest to first read the blueprint to understand the context here:

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Deployers] Optional, platform specific, dependancies in requirements.txt

Hi, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523387 proposes adding a z/VM specific dependancy to nova's requirements.txt. When I objected the counter argument is that we have examples of windows specific dependancies (os-win) and powervm specific dependancies in that file already. I think perhaps all

[openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config drive format

Heya, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527658 is a z/VM patch which introduces their support for config drive. They do this by attaching a tarball to the instance, having pretended in the nova code that it is an iso9660. This worries me. In the past we've been concerned about adding new

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Re-Reminder on the state of WSME

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Michael Johnson wrote: I am willing to help with maintenance (patch reviews/gate fixes), but I cannot commit time to development work on it. Michael and I also spoke in IRC and he too is now a WSME core. Thanks to both of you for stepping up and being willing to help

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Re-Reminder on the state of WSME

I am willing to help with maintenance (patch reviews/gate fixes), but I cannot commit time to development work on it. Michael On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:21 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Dougal Matthews wrote: > >> I would like to see us move away from WSME.

[openstack-dev] [all] Changes to direct tagging by projects under governance

Hey all, We've had a semi-official thing until now that when projects are accepted under governance, they then do all of their tagging and releases via our official release process by submitting patches to the openstack/releases repo. From time to time we would come across projects that either

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config drive format

The more I think about it, the more I dislike how the proposed driver also "lies" about it using iso9660. That's definitely wrong: if CONF.config_drive_format in ['iso9660']: # cloud-init only support iso9660 and vfat, but in z/VM # implementation, can't link a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config drive format

> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527658 is a z/VM patch which > introduces their support for config drive. They do this by attaching a > tarball to the instance, having pretended in the nova code that it is > an iso9660. This worries me. > > In the past we've been concerned about adding new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Deployers] Optional, platform specific, dependancies in requirements.txt

On 4/11/2018 5:09 PM, Michael Still wrote: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523387 proposes adding a z/VM specific dependancy to nova's requirements.txt. When I objected the counter argument is that we have examples of windows specific dependancies (os-win) and powervm specific dependancies

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally] Moving OpenStack plugins into separate repo

Hi andrey, Great to hear this Cheers and I wish you all luck Cheers Goutham. On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 at 11:00 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Andrey, > > Great news! > > Best regards, > Boris Pavlovic > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Andrey Kurilin >

[openstack-dev] [election][tc]TC candidacy

Hi all, I'm announcing my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee. I started following OpenStack community since Portland Summit in 2013, and has been an integral part of it from then on. I'm currently serving as the PTL for the Cyborg project [0] which provides general management