- Original Message -
> Thanks! and Does it need to cinder module to be installed on compute nodes?
You will need to run the cinder-volume service in the compute nodes. You will
have to set it up manually, though, because Packstack only installs it on the
controller.
Regards,
Javier
Hi,
I am deploying OpenStack with 3 compute node, but I am seeing an abnormal
distribution of instance, the instance is only deployed in a specific
compute node, and not distribute among other compute node.
this is my nova.conf from the compute node. (template jinja2 based)
[DEFAULT]
Thanks a lot!
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 1:06 PM Javier Pena wrote:
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks! and Does it need to cinder module to be installed on compute nodes?
>
>
> You will need to run the cinder-volume service in the compute nodes. You
> will have to set it up manually,
Hey, all. I've had a request for a non-admin user to see all the VMs
currently running, irrespective of project. I've gone through the
policy.json file (this is Juno) and enabled everything I could think of
that seemed appropriate, to no avail. Is there any way to do this
without granting
On 2018-11-26 10:30, Mohammed Naser wrote:
> Hi Ken:
>
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/juno-eol/nova/api/openstack/compute/servers.py#L588-L590
OK, I feel kinda dumb, but I never realized I could go and search for
policy.json policy in the pertinent Python files. That's awesome!
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 17:45 +0700, Zufar Dhiyaulhaq wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am deploying OpenStack with 3 compute node, but I am seeing an abnormal
> distribution of instance, the instance is
> only deployed in a specific compute node, and not distribute among other
> compute node.
>
> this is my
Hi Ken:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/juno-eol/nova/api/openstack/compute/servers.py#L588-L590
Good luck (with your upgrades ;))
Mohammed
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> Hey, all. I've had a request for a non-admin user to see all the VMs
> currently
Thanks Jimmy
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:02 PM Jimmy McArthur wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> Just a quick follow up on this... I just discovered a quirky UX bug that
> might explain some frustration people have been having with the
> moderation. There were messages dating back to March 2018. Basically,
Hi all -
Just a quick follow up on this... I just discovered a quirky UX bug that
might explain some frustration people have been having with the
moderation. There were messages dating back to March 2018. Basically,
when you click to approve/disapprove/etc... it appears that the queue is
Hello,
I prepared a third party CI for masakari project.
And, it is already enabled.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/NTT_SystemFault_MasakariIntegration_CI
Can you add the following account to Third-Party CI group[1]?
NTT SystemFault MasakariIntegration CI:
Hi, Sylvain, Jay, Eric and Matt,
I saw the n-rp and reshaper patches in upstream have almost finished. Could you
help to review XenServer vGPU related patches when you have the time?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/520313/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/521041/
Hi,
The controller_ip_port_list option is list of all IP of node which is deployed
octavia-health-manager.
> On Nov 26, 2018, at 8:41 PM, Anna Taraday wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!
>
> I'm looking into how to run Octavia services (controller worker, housekeeper,
> health manager) on several
On 11/21/18 7:16 AM, Rambo wrote:
> yes, but I also have a question, Do we have the quota limit for requests
> to share the image to each other? For example, someone shares the image
> with me without stop, how do we deal with it?
Given that the producer-consumer notifications are not handled by
Hello everyone!
I'm looking into how to run Octavia services (controller worker,
housekeeper, health manager) on several network nodes and get confused with
setup guide [1].
Is there any special config option for such case? (controller_ip_port_list
probably)
What manuals/docs/examples do we have
Here is a related bug [1] and implementation [1] for that. PTAL folks!
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1804822
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:base-container-reduction
Let's also think of removing puppet-tripleo from the base container.
It really brings the world-in (and
At the moment that is all we have for a setup guide.
That said, all of the Octavia controller processes are fully HA
capable. The one setting I can think of is the controller_ip_port_list
setting mentioned above. It will need to contain an entry for each
health manager IP/port as Sa Pham
Hi Rikimaru,
NTT SystemFault MasakariIntegration CI
has been added to the
third-party CI email filter group.
---
Mikhail Medvedev
IBM
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:07 AM Rikimaru Honjo
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I prepared a third party CI for masakari project.
> And, it is already enabled.
>
>
Hi,
The current time for the weekly Cyborg IRC meeting is 1400 UTC,
which is 6 am Pacific and 10pm China time. That is a bad time for most
people in the call.
Please vote in this doodle for what time you prefer.
If you need more options, please respond in this thread.
[1]
18 matches
Mail list logo
