2017-09-21 11:32 GMT+02:00 谭 明宵 :
>
> I had HA setup for placement api to work on high availability enviornment by
> using HAproxy on three controller nodes
>
> vim /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg
>
> listen nova_placement_cluster
> bind 0.0.0.0:8778
>
2017-08-29 15:40 GMT+00:00 Sean Dague :
> On 08/29/2017 10:56 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
>>> Hey, all. We want to proof something out with SSL-enabled endpoints,
>>> and don't want to go through the grief of setting up a whole multi-host
>>> cloud to do it.
2018-05-23 14:02 GMT+00:00 Gary Molenkamp :
> I have a provider network that has two subnets (Using 1.1.1.0/24 as an
> publicly routable example):
>>
>> # openstack subnet list | grep 67917c09-6cb4-4622-ae1b-9f5aef890b0f
>> | 066df21a-d23d-4917-8b28-d097957633dc | provider-campus
2018-03-14 9:21 GMT+01:00 Sławomir Kapłoński :
> Hi,
>
> Are You sure this link is good? I just tried it and I got info that "Already
> voted" which isn't true in fact :)
Comparing with previous polls, these should be personalized links that
need to be sent out to each voter
2018-03-20 14:12 GMT+00:00 Torin Woltjer :
> I've set up haproxy, pacemaker and the like on some controller nodes and
> should have a highly available openstack cluster. One thing I notice almost
> immediately is that volumes show the host as whatever controller owned
2017-08-30 9:04 GMT+02:00 Hirofumi Ichihara :
> Hi team,
>
> Currently neutron-dynamic-routing supports 2 byte AS numbers only[1].
> Does team have a plan supporting 4 byte AS numbers?
>
> [1]:
>
2017-09-29 7:44 GMT+00:00 Mehdi Abaakouk :
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 03:41:54PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
>>
>> On 09/29/2017 03:37 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not aware of issues other than these at this time
>>
>>
>> Actually, that is not true.
2017-09-29 5:41 GMT+00:00 Ian Wienand :
> On 09/29/2017 03:37 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
>>
>> I'm not aware of issues other than these at this time
>
>
> Actually, that is not true. legacy-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode is
> also failing for unknown reasons. Any debugging would
2017-11-21 15:04 GMT+00:00 Jeremy Stanley :
> On 2017-11-21 09:28:20 +0100 (+0100), Thomas Goirand wrote:
> [...]
>> The only way that I see going forward, is having internet access
>> removed from unit tests in the gate, or probably just the above
>> variables set.
> [...]
...
2017-11-23 5:28 GMT+00:00 Tristan Cacqueray :
...
> TL;DR; Is it alright if we re-enable this CI and report those tests on
> zuul-jobs patchsets?
I like the general idea, but please wait for more feedback until doing so.
Also, IMHO it would be better if you could
2017-11-14 8:24 GMT+00:00 Tobias Urdin :
> Trying to trace this, tempest calls the POST /servers//action
> API endpoint for the nova compute api.
>
> https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/lib/services/compute/floating_ips_client.py#L82
>
> Nova then
2017-11-14 16:29 GMT+00:00 Mohammed Naser :
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thank you so much for the work on this, I'm sure we can progress with
> this together. I have noticed that this only occurs in master and
> never in the stable branches. Also, it only occurs under Ubuntu (so
>
2018-05-30 20:37 GMT+00:00 Matt Riedemann :
> On 5/30/2018 9:53 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>>
>> While scope isn't explicitly denoted by an
>> attribute, it can be derived from the attributes of the token response.
>>
>
> Yeah, this was confusing to me, which is why I reported it as a bug in the
>
2018-04-30 7:12 GMT+00:00 Slawomir Kaplonski :
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if there is any way to recheck only one type of job instead of
> rechecking everything.
> For example sometimes I have to debug some random failure in specific job
> type, like „neutron-fullstack” and I want
2018-03-26 22:51 GMT+00:00 Jimmy Mcarthur :
> Hi everyone,
>
> We recently made the tough decision, in conjunction with the dedicated
> volunteers that run TryStack, to end the service as of March 29, 2018. For
> those of you that used it, thank you for being part of the TryStack
2017-12-22 9:18 GMT+00:00 Tobias Urdin :
> Follow up on Alex[1] point. The db sync upgrade for neutron fails here[0].
>
> [0] http://paste.openstack.org/show/629628/
This seems to be a known issue, see [2]. Also I think that this is a
red herring caused by the database
With the current PTG just finished and seeing discussions happen about
the format of the next[0], it seems that the advantages of these seem
to be pretty clear to most, so let me use the occasion to remind
everyone of the disadvantages.
Every meeting that is happening is excluding those
2018-03-14 9:21 GMT+01:00 Sławomir Kapłoński :
> Hi,
>
> Are You sure this link is good? I just tried it and I got info that "Already
> voted" which isn't true in fact :)
Comparing with previous polls, these should be personalized links that
need to be sent out to each voter
2018-03-14 9:21 GMT+01:00 Sławomir Kapłoński :
> Hi,
>
> Are You sure this link is good? I just tried it and I got info that "Already
> voted" which isn't true in fact :)
Comparing with previous polls, these should be personalized links that
need to be sent out to each voter
The last neutron release for Pike has been made in November, a lot of
bug fixes have made it into the stable/pike branch, can we please get
a fresh release for it soon?
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
2018-04-04 2:33 GMT+00:00 David Moreau Simard :
> It won't be very exciting but we really need to do one of the
> following two things soon:
>
> 1) Ansiblify control plane [1]
> 2) Update our puppet things to puppet 4 (or 5?)
>
> Puppet 3 has been end of life since Dec 31,
2018-04-05 19:26 GMT+00:00 Matthew Thode :
> On 18-04-05 20:11:04, Graham Hayes wrote:
>> On 05/04/18 16:47, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> > eventlet-0.22.1 has been out for a while now, we should try and use it.
>> > Going to be fun times.
>> >
>> > I have a review projects
2018-04-06 12:47 GMT+00:00 Colleen Murphy <coll...@gazlene.net>:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, at 4:57 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> On 2018-04-05 14:35:27 +0000 (+), Jens Harbott wrote:
>> > 2018-04-04 2:33 GMT+00:00 David Moreau Simard <dmsim...@redhat.com>:
>>
2018-04-16 7:46 GMT+00:00 Ian Wienand :
> On 04/15/2018 09:32 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
>>
>> The gate is currently broken with
>> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763966.
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561427/
>> Can unblock us in the short term. Any other ideas?
>
>
> I'm
2018-04-23 13:11 GMT+02:00 Graham Hayes :
> Hi All,
>
> We moved our meeting time to 14:00UTC on Wednesdays, but attendance
> has been low, and it is also the middle of the night for one of our
> cores.
>
> I would like to suggest we have an office hours style meeting, with
> one in
2018-03-21 21:44 GMT+01:00 Monty Taylor :
> Hey everybody!
>
> This upcoming Friday we're scheduled to complete the transition from
> python-openstacksdk to openstacksdk. This was started a while back (Tue Jun
> 16 12:05:38 2015 to be exact) by changing the name of what gets
On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 07:48 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 17/04/2019 02.14, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > The infra/OpenDev team continues to make good progress towards this
> > transition and plans to perform the transition on April 19, 2019 as
> > previously scheduled. We will begin the
2018-06-27 16:58 GMT+02:00 Amy Marrich :
> Abhijit,
>
> I'm forwarding your issue to the OpenStack-dev list so that the right people
> might see your issue and respond.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amy (spotz)
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Abhijit Dutta
> Date: Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 5:23
2018-11-07 12:47 GMT+00:00 Mohammed Naser :
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:37 PM Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> Corey Bryant writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM Corey Bryant
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > I'd like to start moving forward with enabling py37 unit tests for a subset
>> > of projects.
Dear OpenStackers,
earlier this year Ubuntu released their current LTS version 18.04
codenamed "Bionic Beaver" and we are now facing the task to migrate
our devstack-based jobs to run on Bionic instead of the previous LTS
version 16.04 "Xenial Xerus".
The last time this has happened two years
30 matches
Mail list logo