On Freitag, 29. November 2019, 23:30:50 CET Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Friday 2019-11-29 14:25, Adrian Schröter wrote:
> >2) Building for foreign architectures using qemu system emulator.
> >
> > osc is offering now to use any hardware architecture. (Thanks a lot
> > Guillaume
> > for the
Hi Adrian,
> That was the version which caused the problems on arm 32bit
> with the the kernel/qemu startup
Not really :-) the change fixed the problem. the issue was that
somebody ,while editing the build script, forgot to remove the
reference to the -pci device and only added the -device
Hi Adrian,
> the current git master is the one with caused the armv7 failures, do
> you speak about that one?
When we talk about why armv7 fails, then yes, thats because
https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/pull/210 is not merged in git
master. Don't be confused by the "merged" state in github,
On Monday 30 November 2015, 11:12:57 wrote Dirk Müller:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> > the current git master is the one with caused the armv7 failures, do
> > you speak about that one?
>
> When we talk about why armv7 fails, then yes, thats because
> https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/pull/210 is not
On Monday 30 November 2015, 09:35:10 wrote Dirk Müller:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> > That was the version which caused the problems on arm 32bit
> > with the the kernel/qemu startup
>
> Not really :-) the change fixed the problem. the issue was that
> somebody ,while editing the build script, forgot to
On 27.11.15 08:07, Adrian Schröter wrote:
> On Friday 27 November 2015, 08:02:19 wrote Adrian Schröter:
>> On Friday 27 November 2015, 07:58:47 wrote Adrian Schröter:
>>> On Thursday 26 November 2015, 22:57:57 wrote Dirk Müller:
Hi Adrian,
> I have disabled for now kernel RNG
On Friday 27 November 2015, 07:58:47 wrote Adrian Schröter:
> On Thursday 26 November 2015, 22:57:57 wrote Dirk Müller:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > > I have disabled for now kernel RNG support in the build script for arm,
> > > but we need to discuss if we want to have this in future (by having
> > >
On Friday 27 November 2015, 08:02:19 wrote Adrian Schröter:
> On Friday 27 November 2015, 07:58:47 wrote Adrian Schröter:
> > On Thursday 26 November 2015, 22:57:57 wrote Dirk Müller:
> > > Hi Adrian,
> > >
> > > > I have disabled for now kernel RNG support in the build script for arm,
> > > >
Dunno why the conversation left the list, but its easily remedied ;-)
- James Mason 'bear454'
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jos Poortvliet j...@opensuse.org
Date: Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:40 AM
Subject: Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Feedback on OBS Private instance
installation
or by replying this message, and then delete
this message from your system.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+h...@opensuse.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
If it helps to unruffle some feathers, maybe
Open (normal voice)
SUSE (whisper)
Build Service (normal voice)
and maybe like so many other products maybe adding as an optional byline...
Powered by OpenSUSE
:)
Tony
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Bryen M. Yunashko susero...@bryen.com wrote:
On 2011-02-04 Bryen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 13:31 +0900, Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
A. We recommend formally changing the name to Open Build Service
B. We recommend formally changing the name to OBS and allowing people
to use openSUSE Build Service or
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2011, 10:18:32 schrieb Jos Poortvliet:
On 2011-02-04 Bryen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 13:31 +0900, Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
A. We recommend formally changing the name to Open Build
Service
B. We recommend formally
On 2011-02-10 Adrian wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2011, 10:18:32 schrieb Jos Poortvliet:
On 2011-02-04 Bryen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 13:31 +0900, Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
A. We recommend formally changing the name to Open Build
Service
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2011, 08:53:59 schrieb Bryen M. Yunashko:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:41 +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
The point is, also the OBS developer team is not free to decide (I
hope this
became clear in earlier mails). OBS is a SUSE/Novell product in first
place,
used
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2011, 09:50:45 schrieb Bryen M. Yunashko:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 16:28 +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2011, 08:53:59 schrieb Bryen M. Yunashko:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:41 +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
The point is, also the OBS
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 16:28 +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2011, 08:53:59 schrieb Bryen M. Yunashko:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:41 +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
The point is, also the OBS developer team is not free to decide (I
hope this
became clear in earlier
On 2/4/11 8:29 AM, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2011 23:50:27 Paul Elliott wrote:
Why not use both names? Then one could use either name depending on the
political context.
open-buildservice for historical reasons also called
opensuse-buildservice
opensuse-buildservice
Meanwhile, we do indeed need to think about the name. How big is the scope of
Bretzn, and IF we decide it's fully cross desktop/distro, is Bretzn the right
name? It has indeed disadvantages, being hard to spell and pronounce for non-
Germans...
Well. Project Bretzn is the codename for the
Am Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011, 01:31:24 schrieb Jos Poortvliet:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 22:57:02 Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, 22:31:18 schrieb Jos Poortvliet:
...
Just my 2cent on this:
* I think when using the just the term OBS more strictly and avoiding
On 03.02.2011, at 10:19, Helen wrote:
Meanwhile, we do indeed need to think about the name. How big is the scope
of
Bretzn, and IF we decide it's fully cross desktop/distro, is Bretzn the
right
name? It has indeed disadvantages, being hard to spell and pronounce for
non-
Germans...
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 04:57:40 AM Frank Karlitschek wrote:
On 03.02.2011, at 10:19, Helen wrote:
Meanwhile, we do indeed need to think about the name. How big is the
scope of Bretzn, and IF we decide it's fully cross desktop/distro, is
Bretzn the right name? It has indeed
On 03/02/2011 04:07 μμ, Ricardo Chung wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 04:57:40 AM Frank Karlitschek wrote:
On 03.02.2011, at 10:19, Helen wrote:
Meanwhile, we do indeed need to think about the name. How big is the
scope of Bretzn, and IF we decide it's fully cross desktop/distro, is
Am 03.02.2011 16:17, schrieb Stathis Iosifidis (aka diamond_gr):
Maybe name OBS as BSOS meaning Building Service for Operating
System(s) but we also can have it as Building Service of (for) open
SUSE or Building Service Open Source.
One acronym with many meanings...
Open Build Service - as
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 17:29 +0100, Kurt Garloff wrote:
Jos,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2011 10:55:01 Adrian Schröter wrote:
One of them (Kurt Garloff) made actually a suggestion some month ago to
rename it to OBS Build
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:55:01AM +0100, Adrian Schröter wrote:
One of them (Kurt Garloff) made actually a suggestion some month ago to rename
it to OBS Build Service. This is in the tradition of the Gnu tools and also
rpm (RedHat Package Manager - rpm package manager) is a good example.
It
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 16:37 +0100, Kim Leyendecker wrote:
Am 03.02.2011 16:17, schrieb Stathis Iosifidis (aka diamond_gr):
Maybe name OBS as BSOS meaning Building Service for Operating
System(s) but we also can have it as Building Service of (for) open
SUSE or Building Service Open
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:19:24 AM Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 16:37 +0100, Kim Leyendecker wrote:
Am 03.02.2011 16:17, schrieb Stathis Iosifidis (aka diamond_gr):
Maybe name OBS as BSOS meaning Building Service for Operating
System(s) but we also can have it as
Hi,
Op woensdag 02 februari 2011 22:42:23 schreef Jos Poortvliet:
Maybe before we can be attractive to developers we have to be
attractive to end users, so that they ditch their distribution
repositories and use ours (which isn't supported by any distribution).
So for you to succeded this
Why not use both names? Then one could use either name depending on the
political context.
open-buildservice for historical reasons also called opensuse-buildservice
opensuse-buildservice for marketing reasons also called open-buildservice
There could be a virtual project so that people
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:19:24 am Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
If I'm not mistaken (and it wouldn't be the first time I've been
mistaken) OBS also packages for Windows. Thus Linux Build Service
wouldn't work. Open is still the best.
As mentioned before we can use only OBS and as
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 19:04 -0600, Rajko M. wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:19:24 am Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
If I'm not mistaken (and it wouldn't be the first time I've been
mistaken) OBS also packages for Windows. Thus Linux Build Service
wouldn't work. Open is still the
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 08:33:58 PM Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 19:04 -0600, Rajko M. wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:19:24 am Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
If I'm not mistaken (and it wouldn't be the first time I've been
mistaken) OBS also packages for
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 07:33:58 pm Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
...
A. We recommend formally changing the name to Open Build Service
B. We recommend formally changing the name to OBS and allowing people
to use openSUSE Build Service or open Build Service as they see fit.
C. Leave it
Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
A. We recommend formally changing the name to Open Build Service
B. We recommend formally changing the name to OBS and allowing people
to use openSUSE Build Service or open Build Service as they see fit.
C. Leave it as is - openSUSE Build Service
I vote for B.
I vote A, Open Build Service
(but only by a small factor over C.)
I VIGOROUSLY oppose B on the grounds of ambiguity creating confusion.
regards,
Helen
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Bryen M. Yunashko susero...@bryen.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 19:04 -0600, Rajko M. wrote:
On
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 13:31 +0900, Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
A. We recommend formally changing the name to Open Build Service
B. We recommend formally changing the name to OBS and allowing people
to use openSUSE Build Service or open Build Service as they see
On Thursday 03 February 2011 23:50:27 Paul Elliott wrote:
Why not use both names? Then one could use either name depending on the
political context.
open-buildservice for historical reasons also called
opensuse-buildservice
opensuse-buildservice for marketing reasons also called open
.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+h...@opensuse.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
is a great achievement, but I think the points in Jos's post
are an indicator of the widespread ignorance that may be holding it back
from reaching out further.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+h
Le 02/02/2011 19:50, Greg Freemyer a écrit :
Are you suggesting openSUSE start advertizing 115,652 packages, in
28,949 repositories on the openSUSE Build Service!
YESSS
having *one* line in the opensuse.org screen with today xxx
packages in OBS would be really great!!
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 19:50:24 Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Helen postmodernhousew...@gmail.com
wrote:
I personally have mixed feelings about this - the fact that OBS has
openSUSE
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 14:46 +1100, Helen wrote:
On a related note, I was under the impression that Bretzn was being
renamed to 'AppInstaller' though perhaps I've got the wrong end of
the stick as the saying goes.
Maybe we should come up with something that conforms with our open
identity?
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
That reads as if you assume OBS is not successful. I feel the opposite.
Indeed. It is popular but could be more so ;-)
BTW we also need to do more in the area of USING those huge numbers. For
marketing but
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 19:50:24 Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Helen postmodernhousew...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 21:27:35 Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com
wrote: snip
That reads as if you assume OBS is not successful. I feel the opposite.
Indeed. It is popular but could be more so ;-)
BTW we also need to
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 21:10:55 Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
snip
This is a proposal that actually has been brought up before in some
marketing discussions. I strongly believe we need to change the name
openSUSE Build Service to Open Build Service because from a marketing
perspective it is
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 22:20:00 Nelson Marques wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com
wrote:
I personally don't see it as a big issue directly - the only issue with
it is that people clearly assume the openSUSE Build Service is there
to Build
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 22:20:00 Nelson Marques wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
Maybe before we can be attractive to developers we have to be
attractive to end users, so that they ditch their distribution
repositories and use
On 02.02.2011, at 22:22, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 21:21:59 Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 14:46 +1100, Helen wrote:
On a related note, I was under the impression that Bretzn was being
renamed to 'AppInstaller' though perhaps I've got the wrong end
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 19:50:24 Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, 22:31:18 schrieb Jos Poortvliet:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 22:20:00 Nelson Marques wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com
wrote:
I personally don't see it as a big issue directly - the only issue
with
it is
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Jos Poortvliet jospoortvl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 21:10:55 Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
snip
This is a proposal that actually has been brought up before in some
marketing discussions. I strongly believe we need to change the name
openSUSE
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 22:57:02 Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, 22:31:18 schrieb Jos Poortvliet:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 22:20:00 Nelson Marques wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jos Poortvliet
jospoortvl...@gmail.com
wrote:
I personally
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 03:44:00 pm Helen wrote:
At what point did the Marketing team and OBS representatives
have a round table and decide on the optimal branding for the build
service? Is there an IRC log on that?
OBS is much older then marketing effort :)
This thread is the first
the points in Jos's post
are an indicator of the widespread ignorance that may be holding it back
from reaching out further.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+h...@opensuse.org
--
To unsubscribe, e
Am Montag, 27. September 2010, 15:09:33 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
On Sunday 26 September 2010 17:23:01 Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
Jos,
Yes, we already did piratepad for the obs 2.1 draf for announcement,
http://piratepad.net/VXa1B1xryD
Hi,
I suggest to explain what obs is right at the
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 10:54:02 Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Montag, 27. September 2010, 15:09:33 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
On Sunday 26 September 2010 17:23:01 Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
Jos,
Yes, we already did piratepad for the obs 2.1 draf for announcement,
On Monday 27 September 2010 16:39:21 Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Montag, 27. September 2010, 14:59:28 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
On Sunday 26 September 2010 17:23:01 Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
Jos,
Yes, we already did piratepad for the obs 2.1 draf for announcement,
Am Dienstag, 28. September 2010, 10:47:13 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
On Monday 27 September 2010 16:39:21 Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Montag, 27. September 2010, 14:59:28 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
On Sunday 26 September 2010 17:23:01 Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
Jos,
Yes, we already did
On Sunday 26 September 2010 17:23:01 Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
Jos,
Yes, we already did piratepad for the obs 2.1 draf for announcement,
http://piratepad.net/VXa1B1xryD
What about the Beta1 announcement? Could you do one as well, please?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE,
On Sunday 26 September 2010 17:23:01 Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
Jos,
Yes, we already did piratepad for the obs 2.1 draf for announcement,
http://piratepad.net/VXa1B1xryD
Hi,
I suggest to explain what obs is right at the beginning of the text - I've
added a bit now but it does not fit in.
Am Montag, 27. September 2010, 14:59:28 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
On Sunday 26 September 2010 17:23:01 Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
Jos,
Yes, we already did piratepad for the obs 2.1 draf for announcement,
http://piratepad.net/VXa1B1xryD
What about the Beta1 announcement? Could you do one as
on the train on saturday evening
but that
might be too late... If you have a draft by then I can polish it and
it can
go live on Monday (which is a better date to do announcements
anyway).
cheers
Jos
Andreas
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [opensuse
Argh, the obs team is too fast for us.
This is the internal announcement on the obs mailing list - we can make the
official one on news.o.o any time.
Carlos, Isabel, how can we help you?
Andreas
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [opensuse-buildservice] OBS 2.1 Beta 1
Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Redirector availability
On 2007-09-15 11:43:46 +0100, Benji Weber wrote:
So the redirector has gone down /again/ this weekend.
wrong. the redirector is still working:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/
many
2007/8/14, Rajko M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 13 August 2007 05:38, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
Anyone knows if the BuildService subscription circuit still works?, i
asked for an account weeks ago and i'm still getting Errorcode:
unconfirmed_user.
Hi Ciro,
I would ask the same in opensuse
On Aug 13 2007 10:02, Adrian Schröter wrote:
On Monday 13 August 2007 09:57:27 wrote Marcus Meissner:
Hi,
I am getting occasional request to keep stable Wine
versions for some of the older releases.
Is there a mechanism that would allow that?
In general you have two options:
1. You could
Anyone knows if the BuildService subscription circuit still works?, i
asked for an account weeks ago and i'm still getting Errorcode:
unconfirmed_user.
Ciro
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 13 August 2007 05:38, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
Anyone knows if the BuildService subscription circuit still works?, i
asked for an account weeks ago and i'm still getting Errorcode:
unconfirmed_user.
Hi Ciro,
I would ask the same in opensuse-buildservice mail list.
--
Regards,
Rajko
Detlef Steuer wrote:
so I´ll try again:
Hi,
what do others think of yesterday´s deal?
Bussiness as usual..
How do you feel?
I feel this can be a good thing , but probably unlikely to affect us,
nor the buildservice , probably we will not notice any difference.
A (very unusual)
Reply on 30-10-2006 9:33:53 Hi! Having installed Thunderbird 2.0b1 from the openbuild tree if found enigmail being broken. This add-on currently sup- ports Thunderbird versions up to 2.0a1. This means, I can- not read even my own archied eMails until there is a new release of enigmail. I'm
72 matches
Mail list logo
