On Fri, June 8, 2007 1:29 pm, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-06-08 at 13:06 -0400, George Stoianov wrote:
Guys lets not forget that encrypting a partition is only protecting
data when the computer is turned off i.e. none can just start it
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 06:39 -0700, Kai Ponte wrote:
On Fri, June 8, 2007 1:29 pm, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-06-08 at 13:06 -0400, George Stoianov wrote:
Guys lets not forget that encrypting a partition is only protecting
data
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 03:30 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Thursday 2007-06-07 at 18:12 -0700, Kai Ponte wrote:
That is my initial thought. One of the articles I referenced, however,
mentioned how the root partition - particularly the
Guys lets not forget that encrypting a partition is only protecting
data when the computer is turned off i.e. none can just start it and
read my stuff, when it is on the partition is mounted with your
password for you to use it. When that happens whether it is /home,
/var or /srv it does not
George Stoianov wrote:
Guys lets not forget that encrypting a partition is only protecting
data when the computer is turned off i.e. none can just start it and
read my stuff, when it is on the partition is mounted with your
password for you to use it. When that happens whether it is /home,
/var
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-06-08 at 13:06 -0400, George Stoianov wrote:
Guys lets not forget that encrypting a partition is only protecting
data when the computer is turned off i.e. none can just start it and
Obviously. I haven't forgotten that. But
On 6/6/07, Carlos E. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2007-06-06 at 15:47 -0400, George Stoianov wrote:
If you cannot resize I think you maybe able
to create an encrypted file and mounted using some loop mechanism I
cannot remember
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 11:52 -0700, Kai Ponte wrote:
My company has a new policy coming into effect, requiring all mobile
devices have encryption built in.
Just wondering,
encryption costs (some) cpu-cycles.
Why ebcrypting evrything under root, usr, opt, srv, etc, tmp and var?
Everything
Kai Ponte wrote:
On Thu, June 7, 2007 4:17 pm, Hans Witvliet wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 11:52 -0700, Kai Ponte wrote:
My company has a new policy coming into effect, requiring all mobile
devices have encryption built in.
Just wondering,
encryption costs (some) cpu-cycles.
Why ebcrypting
On Thu, June 7, 2007 4:17 pm, Hans Witvliet wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 11:52 -0700, Kai Ponte wrote:
My company has a new policy coming into effect, requiring all mobile
devices have encryption built in.
Just wondering,
encryption costs (some) cpu-cycles.
Why ebcrypting evrything under
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Thursday 2007-06-07 at 18:12 -0700, Kai Ponte wrote:
That is my initial thought. One of the articles I referenced, however,
mentioned how the root partition - particularly the FUBAR myriad of
folders containing stuff - will have personal
My new laptop (HP/Compaq nw9440) runs SUSE 10.2 exclusively. I do have
vmware and cxoffice for wintendo apps but no specific partition. My
only partitions are root, home and swap.
My company has a new policy coming into effect, requiring all mobile
devices have encryption built in. Though not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2007-06-06 at 11:52 -0700, Kai Ponte wrote:
My new laptop (HP/Compaq nw9440) runs SUSE 10.2 exclusively. I do have
vmware and cxoffice for wintendo apps but no specific partition. My
only partitions are root, home and swap.
I would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2007-06-06 at 15:47 -0400, George Stoianov wrote:
If you cannot resize I think you maybe able
to create an encrypted file and mounted using some loop mechanism I
cannot remember exactly.
That part is easy; for instance, in fstab:
14 matches
Mail list logo
