On 5/17/07, James D. Parra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if hypothetically there are patent infringements in the Linux kernel,
then the open source community would do the right thing and remove the
offending code and, because open source development moves so rapidly, that
means Linux would no
James D. Parra wrote:
This is a good article;
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/12212/53/
Even if hypothetically there are patent infringements in the Linux kernel,
then the open source community would do the right thing and remove the
offending code and, because open source development
On Wed, May 16, 2007 12:10:46 PM -0700, James D. Parra
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is a good article;
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/12212/53/
Please, not again! Can it be good if it makes mistakes like this:
Even if hypothetically there are patent infringements in the Linux
On Friday 18 May 2007 02:54, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 12:10:46 PM -0700, James D. Parra
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is a good article;
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/12212/53/
Please, not again! Can it be good if it makes mistakes like this:
Even if
* George Osvald [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-17-07 21:33]:
Well I am not a lawyer but I think there are problems with Microsoft claims.
And they would probably fit better in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please have some consideration and stop filling the list and archives
with wild rantings and speculation
On Thu May 17 2007, George Osvald scratched these words onto a coconut
shell, hoping for an answer:
On Friday 18 May 2007 02:54, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 12:10:46 PM -0700, James D. Parra
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is a good article;
This is a good article;
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/12212/53/
Even if hypothetically there are patent infringements in the Linux kernel,
then the open source community would do the right thing and remove the
offending code and, because open source development moves so rapidly, that
On Thursday 17 May 2007, James D. Parra wrote:
This is a good article;
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/12212/53/
Even if hypothetically there are patent infringements in the Linux kernel,
then the open source community would do the right thing and remove the
offending code and,
George Osvald wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007, James D. Parra wrote:
This is a good article;
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/12212/53/
Even if hypothetically there are patent infringements in the Linux kernel,
then the open source community would do the right thing and remove the
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 20:18, Jim Flanagan wrote:
If Microsoft ever started talking specifics, about any little thing, they
would be dead. Completely and totally dead. There is no way they can engage
the community on ANY specific topic without debasing, degrading
themselves into the lowest
On Monday May 14 2007 10:08:29 pm frank nelson wrote:
Only fair. It would be a bit hypocritical to demand a
standard for others, that one does not demand of
oneself.
Ah that'd be Microsoft Marketing 101 just down the hall second door on the
right.
--
Stan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
S Glasoe wrote:
On Monday May 14 2007 10:08:29 pm frank nelson wrote:
Only fair. It would be a bit hypocritical to demand a standard
for others, that one does not demand of oneself.
Ah that'd be Microsoft Marketing 101 just down the hall second
Dave Howorth wrote:
Jan Karjalainen wrote:
S Glasoe wrote:
On Monday May 14 2007 10:08:29 pm frank nelson wrote:
Only fair. It would be a bit hypocritical to demand a standard
for others, that one does not demand of oneself.
Ah that'd be Microsoft Marketing 101
--- James Knott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was some recent discussion on this list about
MS claims of patent
infringement and someone claimed they hadn't done so
recently.
From the Suse, M$ and Dell thread.
Nope, I don't need recent cites. Until retracted
Ballmers
statments
On Monday 14 May 2007 04:59, frank nelson wrote:
thank you for bringing this article
to my attention, so that I might be allowed an
opportunity to correct a situation in which I was in
error. Ya done good kid, and I truly appreciate it.
Very nice...
:)
--
Kind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 13 May 2007 19:01, John Andersen wrote:
On Sunday 13 May 2007, Pueblo Native wrote:
Gutierrez refuses to identify specific patents or explain how
they're being infringed, lest FOSS advocates start filing challenges to
them.
Security
--- M Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 14 May 2007 04:59, frank nelson wrote:
thank you for bringing this article
to my attention, so that I might be allowed an
opportunity to correct a situation in which I was
in
error. Ya done good kid, and I truly appreciate
it.
There was some recent discussion on this list about MS claims of patent
infringement and someone claimed they hadn't done so recently.
From the Suse, M$ and Dell thread.
Nope, I don't need recent cites. Until retracted
Ballmers
statments stand as official Microsoft Policy.
Therefore the
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 15:25 -0400, James Knott wrote:
There was some recent discussion on this list about MS claims of patent
infringement and someone claimed they hadn't done so recently.
From the Suse, M$ and Dell thread.
Nope, I don't need recent cites. Until retracted
Ballmers
James Knott wrote:
There was some recent discussion on this list about MS claims of patent
infringement and someone claimed they hadn't done so recently.
From the Suse, M$ and Dell thread.
Nope, I don't need recent cites. Until retracted
This might be completely irrelevant, but am I in
On Sunday 13 May 2007 21:25:13 James Knott wrote:
There was some recent discussion on this list about MS claims of patent
infringement and someone claimed they hadn't done so recently.
Microsoft also claims The Free Software movement is dead. Linux doesn't exist
in 2007. @
On Sunday 13 May 2007, Pueblo Native wrote:
Gutierrez refuses to identify specific patents or explain how
they're being infringed, lest FOSS advocates start filing challenges to
them.
Security by Obscurity takes a new twist.
--
_
John Andersen
--
To
On Sun May 13 2007, John Andersen scratched these words onto a coconut
shell, hoping for an answer:
On Sunday 13 May 2007, Pueblo Native wrote:
Gutierrez refuses to identify specific patents or explain how
they're being infringed, lest FOSS advocates start filing
challenges to them.
On Sunday 13 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun May 13 2007, John Andersen scratched these words onto a coconut
shell, hoping for an answer:
On Sunday 13 May 2007, Pueblo Native wrote:
Gutierrez refuses to identify specific patents or explain how
they're being infringed, lest
24 matches
Mail list logo
