On Sat, 29 Dec, 2007 at 19:22:13 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Jon Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-29-07 16:15]:
Incidentally it's around the same time I check the mail and see this thread.
Uninstalling Amarok;
a13:/home/jon # rpm --test -e amarok
error: Failed dependencies:
On Sun, 30 Dec, 2007 at 09:26:04 +0100, Jon Clausen wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec, 2007 at 19:22:13 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
rpm --test -e amarok amarok-xine amarok-yauap
Indeed. I should have thought of that.
you are building a house of sticks and pulling out hair that will not
On Sat, 29 Dec, 2007 at 12:20:49 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
snip
I can certainly see an application having a dependency for certain things
in
the basic desktop system. I cannot see why the desktop system would have a
dependency on an obscure add-on type of application to function. That is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Jon Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-29-07 16:15]:
Incidentally it's around the same time I check the mail and see this thread.
Uninstalling Amarok;
a13:/home/jon # rpm --test -e amarok
error: Failed dependencies:
libamarok.so.0 is
