On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 07:01 -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:40, Mike McMullin wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 22:20 -0500, SOTL wrote:
...
Why install a lesser operating system (Ubuntu) than the one you
already have installed (SuSE)?
Please rethink and
On 7/10/07, Matthew Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I often encounter a load of enthusiasm for Ubuntu (and the exact opposite for
Suse) never understand why!
Good at marketing? Good at generating hype? It's no secret that now
and in the past the most popular distribution (of the
I often encounter a load of enthusiasm for Ubuntu (and the exact opposite for
Suse) never understand why!
Good at marketing? Good at generating hype? It's no secret that now
and in the past the most popular distribution (of the _online/vocal_
community) is not the one that is the most
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, SOTL wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 00:39, Hans Linux wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D i would like to hv it install on my laptop.
currently i have dual boot for my Vista and SUSE already. Is it OK for
me to install ubuntu to have triple boot?
Why?
Why
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McMullin wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:39 +0700, Hans Linux wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D i would like to hv it install on my laptop.
currently i have dual boot for my Vista and SUSE already. Is it OK for
me to install ubuntu to have
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 22:20 -0500, SOTL wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 00:39, Hans Linux wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D i would like to hv it install on my laptop.
currently i have dual boot for my Vista and SUSE already. Is it OK for
me to install ubuntu to have triple boot?
Why?
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 08:55 +0100, G T Smith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McMullin wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:39 +0700, Hans Linux wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D i would like to hv it install on my laptop.
currently i have dual boot for my Vista
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 05:52 -0400, Mike McMullin wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 08:55 +0100, G T Smith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McMullin wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:39 +0700, Hans Linux wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D i would like to hv it
G T Smith wrote:
I tried setting up dual booting with Red Hat a while back and it was not
an experience I wish to repeat, Things may have improved but neither OS
was totally happy with the others implementation of the partition and
file system structure with quite destructive results.
I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Knott wrote:
G T Smith wrote:
I tried setting up dual booting with Red Hat a while back and it was not
an experience I wish to repeat, Things may have improved but neither OS
was totally happy with the others implementation of the partition
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:40, Mike McMullin wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 22:20 -0500, SOTL wrote:
...
Why install a lesser operating system (Ubuntu) than the one you
already have installed (SuSE)?
Please rethink and repost your objection. *Both* OS' are Linux.
Am I to understand
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:01, Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:40, Mike McMullin wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 22:20 -0500, SOTL wrote:
...
Why install a lesser operating system (Ubuntu) than the one you
already have installed (SuSE)?
Please rethink and
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:34:15 ka1ifq wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:01, Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:40, Mike McMullin wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 22:20 -0500, SOTL wrote:
...
Why install a lesser operating system (Ubuntu) than the one you
already
On Monday 09 July 2007 12:39, Hans Linux wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D i would like to hv it install on my laptop.
currently i have dual boot for my Vista and SUSE already. Is it OK for
me to install ubuntu to have triple boot? would ubuntu set triple boot
automatically, or i hv to edit
On 2007/07/09 13:13 (GMT+0700) Fajar Priyanto apparently typed:
On Monday 09 July 2007 12:39 (GMT+0700), Hans Linux wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D
Why do you think so? It has a whole bunch of different CD you need to choose
from according to which desktop environment you want (Gnome, KDE,
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:39 +0700, Hans Linux wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D i would like to hv it install on my laptop.
currently i have dual boot for my Vista and SUSE already. Is it OK for
me to install ubuntu to have triple boot? would ubuntu set triple boot
automatically, or i hv
ubuntu is quite tempting :D
Why do you think so? It has a whole bunch of different CD you need to choose
from according to which desktop environment you want (Gnome, KDE, XFCE), and
whether your installation will require advanced install features.
And SUSE doesn't have several CDs and/or
Hans Linux wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D i would like to hv it install on my
laptop. currently i have dual boot for my Vista and SUSE already. Is
it OK for me to install ubuntu to have triple boot? would ubuntu set
triple boot automatically, or i hv to edit manually some menu list?
Felix Miata wrote:
Installing doz first IS NOT NECESSARY!!! In many cases, it isn't even
desirable. It merely requires some understanding of what to do and what not
to do in order to avoid booby traps.
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/install-doz-after.html
Some installs from a recovery partition
On 2007/07/09 07:19 (GMT-0400) James Knott apparently typed:
Felix Miata wrote:
Installing doz first IS NOT NECESSARY!!! In many cases, it isn't even
desirable. It merely requires some understanding of what to do and what not
to do in order to avoid booby traps.
On 2007/07/09 09:46 (GMT+0200) Clayton apparently typed:
Felix Miata wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D
Why do you think so? It has a whole bunch of different CD you need to choose
from according to which desktop environment you want (Gnome, KDE, XFCE), and
whether your installation will
It makes for confusion among nOObs trying to make an intelligent choice.
Most (in my experience) simply go for the vanilla Ubuntu. Those that
know enough to make a choice usually have enough information available
to actually make that choice without the confusion. :-)
*buntu there aren't
On Monday 09 July 2007 00:39, Hans Linux wrote:
ubuntu is quite tempting :D i would like to hv it install on my laptop.
currently i have dual boot for my Vista and SUSE already. Is it OK for
me to install ubuntu to have triple boot?
Why?
Why install a lesser operating system (Ubuntu) than
ubuntu is quite tempting :D i would like to hv it install on my laptop.
currently i have dual boot for my Vista and SUSE already. Is it OK for
me to install ubuntu to have triple boot? would ubuntu set triple boot
automatically, or i hv to edit manually some menu list? anyone
experience this
24 matches
Mail list logo
