Hi,
Has anyone found a way to defeat the automatic inactivity locking of user
sessions? I've tried Yast SecurityUsers User Management but nothing
available there.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Keith Goggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
1.I've added http://mirror.pacific.net.au/linux/suse/update/10.2/ to
opensuseupdater in both 10.2b2 and 10.2RC1.
In 10.2b2 opensuseupdater shows 7 patches available.
In 10.2RC1 opensuseupdater shows none?
Yes, that's
Anybody an idea why (unlike with xfs or reiserfs) I could not manage to
make an ext3 filesystem with external journal.
After mkfs.ext3 -b 4096 -O /dev/sda5 /dev/hda7 I get: Unvollständige
Dateisystem-Option gesetzt: /dev/sda5
And after mke2fs -b 4096 -n -j -J device=/dev/hda7 /dev/sda5 I end up
On Sunday 26 November 2006 11:24, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Anders Johansson schrieb:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 11:06, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Anybody an idea why (unlike with xfs or reiserfs) I could not manage to
make an ext3 filesystem with external journal.
After mkfs.ext3
Anders Johansson schrieb:
I think you misunderstand the manpage. It should literally be journal_dev,
that shouldn't be replaced with a device name.
If you want to have the journal on hda7, the command should be
mkfs.ext3 -b 4096 -O journal_dev /dev/hda7
Anders Johansson schrieb:
I think you misunderstand the manpage. It should literally be journal_dev,
that shouldn't be replaced with a device name.
If you want to have the journal on hda7, the command should be
mkfs.ext3 -b 4096 -O journal_dev /dev/hda7
Interesting: now after external
On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:33, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Anders Johansson schrieb:
I think you misunderstand the manpage. It should literally be
journal_dev, that shouldn't be replaced with a device name.
If you want to have the journal on hda7, the command should be
mkfs.ext3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pascal Bleser schreef:
Robby (M9.) wrote:
How to change the size of a partition, fi /home?
Partitions can only resized if not mounted...
Depends.
They can be resized online when you're using LVM and reiserfs (or XFS,
but you can only grow
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
I can't say why it should be slower, but since it shouldn't be used at all,
it
doesn't seem to matter much
That depends on your point of view. From a user's point of view this is
really pointless because it does not make any
On Sunday 26 November 2006 14:01, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
I can't say why it should be slower, but since it shouldn't be used at
all, it doesn't seem to matter much
That depends on your point of view. From a user's point of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carlos E. R. schreef:
The Saturday 2006-11-25 at 20:15 +0100, Robby (M9.) wrote:
This is needed indeed, the available partioning features are 'antique',
and not realy usable during use, only when all is 'clean'.
I have used many times the
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 02:04:17PM +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 14:01, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
I can't say why it should be slower, but since it shouldn't be used at
all, it doesn't seem to matter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mauro Parra schreef:
Hallo,
On 11/25/06, Pascal Bleser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The partitioners we have are inferior, you have to admit that.
Inferior to what ?
Not to any Linux distribution
Is it normal that it takes 23 min to format a 140GB partitioan with ext3? I
can't remember that I encountered such long partitioning times with
resiserfs.
--
Richard Bos
Without a home the journey is endless
-
To unsubscribe,
Robert Schiele schrieb:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
I can't say why it should be slower, but since it shouldn't be used at all,
it
doesn't seem to matter much
That depends on your point of view. From a user's point of view this is
really
Anders Johansson schrieb:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 14:01, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
I can't say why it should be slower, but since it shouldn't be used at
all, it doesn't seem to matter much
That depends on your
Terje J. Hanssen wrote:
I've downloaded and installed the CD isos for 10.2 RC1, both OSS and
non-OSS. However there are some packages I need and that I don't find
afterwards with YaSTProgramsAdd-Remove software.
These single rpms are however found in the factory links, but which
have to be
I have problems with the sax2 configuration panel. this is
not recent, but is still there in 10.2.
I don't see how I can manage to have several screen
definition (640x480, 800x600...) or a virtual definition
(800x600 on 640x480 screen)
of course, I know how to add this with vi :-).
the
Hello,
I updated beta2 to RC1 yesterday.
Installation sources: Factory tree and inst-source-extra from yesterday,
which should be newer than RC1.
Things I noted:
- grub is not installed - my system still boots the grub which was
installed by 10.1 (still living on another partition)
Hello,
Am Samstag, 25. November 2006 21:18 schrieb Robby (M9.):
gpgkeys: key 5F9FD7E57E8BA438 not found on keyserver
BTW: Your GPG key still isn't available on the keyservers :-(
I can not believe, that i am the only one, who thinks, that the
available partitioners do not work.
If you do
Thanks a lot for all your comments, I have refined my proposal now
taking them into account!
How does this look? Are we fine to go for 10.2 and 10.3 with these?
Goals
=
* Clear naming
* Smaller repositories for faster metadata download
* Use structure for 10.3 again
Separate trees
2006/11/26, Christian Boltz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I updated beta2 to RC1 yesterday.
Installation sources: Factory tree and inst-source-extra from yesterday,
which should be newer than RC1.
How has You made the update, online, or via CDs?
Because online I could'nt make the update.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks a lot for all your comments, I have refined my proposal now
taking them into account!
How does this look? Are we fine to go for 10.2 and 10.3 with these?
100% ACK
Goals
=
* Clear naming
* Smaller
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 04:56:33PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks a lot for all your comments, I have refined my proposal now
taking them into account!
How does this look? Are we fine to go for 10.2 and 10.3 with these?
[...]
Factory Distribution
The
On Monday 27 November 2006 02:56, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks a lot for all your comments, I have refined my proposal now
taking them into account!
I realise it's a bit late to comment now, but I am curious to know why you
have not mentioned the update repositories in this proposal?
Hello,
first: there's another issue: I could not register while update (None
of the installed products can be registered at the Novell registration
server.)
- bugreport?
Am Sonntag, 26. November 2006 17:02 schrieb Juan Erbes:
2006/11/26, Christian Boltz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Installation
On Sunday 26 November 2006 17:25, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
Only opensuseupdater is concerned by the problem. YOU shows the
available test patches. I did installation without Zenworks and can
confirm the problem.
Can you guys please:
- open a bugreport
run as root:
zypp-checkpatches
On Sunday 26 November 2006 17:37, Christian Boltz wrote:
- grub is not installed - my system still boots the grub which was
installed by 10.1 (still living on another partition)
Possibly bug #223576?
Andras
--
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment -
On Sunday 26 November 2006 08:11, Terje J. Hanssen wrote:
These single rpms are however found in the factory links, but which
have to be downloaded and installed manually from a terminal:
http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-sou
rce/
Hello,
Am Sonntag, 26. November 2006 18:14 schrieb Andras Mantia:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 17:37, Christian Boltz wrote:
- grub is not installed - my system still boots the grub which was
installed by 10.1 (still living on another partition)
Possibly bug #223576?
I don't think so for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jaeger schreef:
Thanks a lot for all your comments, I have refined my proposal now
taking them into account!
How does this look? Are we fine to go for 10.2 and 10.3 with these?
Goals
=
* Clear naming
* Smaller repositories
On Sunday 26 November 2006 18:25, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
Am Sonntag, 26. November 2006 18:14 schrieb Andras Mantia:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 17:37, Christian Boltz wrote:
- grub is not installed - my system still boots the grub which was
installed by 10.1 (still living on
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
How does this look? Are we fine to go for 10.2 and 10.3 with these?
Goals
=
* Clear naming
* Smaller repositories for faster metadata download
* Use structure for 10.3 again
Separate trees
==
* OSS (factory)
* NON-OSS
On Sunday 26 November 2006 09:13, jdd wrote:
jdd a écrit :
I want to congratulate the openSUSE 10.2 developpers, because I'm on the
way of installing the RC1 on a very low end machine
http://fr.opensuse.org/Utilisateur:Jdd/alb/La_Mouette
finally the install goes well and gnome run quite
Rajko M a écrit :
have you put that on MiniSUSE page?
wasn't, but is now :-)
I advocate for a new Linuw advertisements:
If you buy Vista, for sure you need a brand new computer.
Please, give me the old one, I need it to install my brand
new openSUSE...
or
If you buy Vista, for sure you
Running a 10.2RC1 YaST2 Online-Update, I'm wondering what this error
message mean and what the reason is:
Initializing online-updates
Updating sources .
No access to Installation medium SUSE-Linux-10.2-Updates CD1
Verify that the server is available
Address
Marcus Meissner schrieb:
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 08:32:51PM +0100, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
opensuseupdater shows me no updates. What am I doing wrong?
There are no new updates for RC1 yet.
I've just installed another 11 updates, like an hour ago.
FMF
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:45:23PM +0100, Terje J. Hanssen wrote:
Running a 10.2RC1 YaST2 Online-Update, I'm wondering what this error
message mean and what the reason is:
Initializing online-updates
Updating sources .
No access to Installation medium SUSE-Linux-10.2-Updates CD1
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 08:00:49PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 08:32:51PM +0100, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
opensuseupdater shows me no updates. What am I doing wrong?
There are no new updates for RC1 yet.
2 now:
- fetchmsttfonts script for TrueType fonts.
- libzypp
Hello,
Am Sonntag, 26. November 2006 17:34 schrieb Anders Johansson:
[...]
10.1 installed grub to the /boot partition, and made it active. The
MBR boots the active partition. Your 10.2 install could have
installed grub to its /boot partition and never made it active. This
could be why it
On Monday 27 November 2006 04:04, Duncan Mac-Vicar wrote:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 17:25, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
Only opensuseupdater is concerned by the problem. YOU shows the
available test patches. I did installation without Zenworks and can
confirm the problem.
Can you guys please:
2006/11/26, Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Keith Goggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
1.I've added http://mirror.pacific.net.au/linux/suse/update/10.2/ to
opensuseupdater in both 10.2b2 and 10.2RC1.
In 10.2b2 opensuseupdater shows 7 patches available.
In 10.2RC1
Marcus Meissner schrieb:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 08:00:49PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 08:32:51PM +0100, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
opensuseupdater shows me no updates. What am I doing wrong?
There are no new updates for RC1 yet.
2 now:
-
Marcus Meissner schrieb:
Started libzypp 3rd test update about one hour ago. Now it's hanging for
a while at 99% - updating software - finishing...
What are we testing here? The bandwidth of the update server?
I used yast online update to test. If you used ZMD/zen-updater and it
Keith Goggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 27 November 2006 02:56, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks a lot for all your comments, I have refined my proposal now
taking them into account!
I realise it's a bit late to comment now, but I am curious to know why you
have not mentioned the
Naming
==
* let's use repository instead of catalog, inst-source etc.
This is the one I like best :)
Below .../opensuse/distribution/ we will have a factory-repo with
the following subdirectories:
Keep it symmetric and use factory/repo/ instead, as already suggested.
Nothing else that
Am Sunday 26 November 2006 17:22 schrieb Marcel Hilzinger:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 04:56:33PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks a lot for all your comments, I have refined my proposal now
taking them into account!
How does this look? Are we fine to go for 10.2 and 10.3 with these?
Hello,
Adrian Schröter wrote:
Actually, I do not want to touch the factory directories atm, because we will
anyway move them into the build service later. Changing it for that timeframe
does only cause problems IMHO.
What does it mean for PPC users? No more 'factory', or there will be PPC
48 matches
Mail list logo
