Quick clarification...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of James Cook
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:18 PM
> The invokes the webwork action and the view is
> returned, however the view is returned as a String! It is not
> p
I have a web page coded as a JSP and utilizing JSTL tags. On this page,
I have a dynamic report that is generated by a webwork call. I am using
the tag to reference the webwork action, and it is mapped to
a JSP view for rendering.
Time for a visual?
index.jsp
+--+
|
I haven't started using it yet, but I will be soon enough. I can't wait
either. Looks cool.
Blake
> Not yet - but I'm itching to learn how to do it :)
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
> On 9/1/03 4:48 PM, "Peter Kelley" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the
> words:
>
>> I've postulated a few changes to the Jasper
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 18:19, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
> Pardon me for my ignorance... but could you possibly provide a high level
> detail of what Jasper Reports is, specifically how it integrates in with WW?
>
> -Pat
>
Jasper Reports is an open source reporting tool that allows the creation
of
Not sure if this is really a WebWork problem (the stack traces in the file
attached all show WW stuff, but they aren't locking there), but I'm getting
lockups in Orion. Basically, it appears that the orion classloader is being
locked on to and never let go (though I could't figure out why that is).
One more thought... maybe the initialization parameters should become a
standard interceptor as well. I believe rickard had suggested this.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:43 AM
Subject: RE: [O
Looks great Jason! Can't wait to see it!
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:43 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] XWork Interceptors
> Patrick, as we discussed on IRC, I've been working on this. I've
Well, for a different example, how about setting up a Hibernate Session
and then closing it on the way out? Then Hibernate can manage your
transactions.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
As for intercepting transactions, I would say have a key that is set in
the context which tells the after() part of the Tx interceptor what to
do. Kind of like setting rollbackOnly on a UserTransaction. Assume that
the transaction should be committed unless an exception is caught or
rollbackOnly is
Patrick, as we discussed on IRC, I've been working on this. I've
basically got the Interceptor framework built, I think, although I
haven't tested it :-)
I'm not sure what you were thinking, but mine does not plug in at the
ActionFactoryProxy level. Basically what mine does is to mimic the way
the
I have to say, I really do think that adding tx on this level is a bad idea. For
one thing, webwork is NOT a tx system, whatever it talks to should provide
whatever tx support you require. Reinventing the wheel by handling the tx on
this level seemsa waste of effort (vendors have already spent
So anyway, I'm just going to disregard the "Documentation" thread and start
a thread that is actually useful :)
(Though, Ken, we're still hoping your willing to do some Doc work!)
So besides Action Chaining, Rickard made a good point that interceptors is
very important as well. I'd like to talk a
Which once again shows the complete inadequacy of chat and email w/re to irony and
subtlety. Now, if we could just get people to stay away from it (irony and subtelty
that is -- not mail and chat)...
cheers,
/Måns
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Aapo Laakkonen wrote:
I don't get it.
Can't you see the irony?
Well, I *could* see it as irony, but since it wasn't even remotely funny
it would be more like a sarcastic rant, and since Joe seems to want to
avoid things like that (given his recent new years benediction) it
didn't make sense
> I don't get it.
Can't you see the irony?
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwo
I believe Joseph was attempting to be humorous.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Documentation
>
>
> Joseph Ottinger wrote:
> >>Joseph Ottinger wrote:
> >
Joseph Ottinger wrote:
Joseph Ottinger wrote:
He was probably offended by all the horrible negativity aimed at him on
#java.
What was said about him on #java?
I dunno, probably something like "Ken is supposed to be doing
documentation, which is really cool, esp. since he apparently has
exper
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Rickard Öberg wrote:
> Joseph Ottinger wrote:
> > He was probably offended by all the horrible negativity aimed at him on
> > #java.
>
> What was said about him on #java?
I dunno, probably something like "Ken is supposed to be doing
documentation, which is really
Joseph Ottinger wrote:
He was probably offended by all the horrible negativity aimed at him on
#java.
What was said about him on #java?
/Rickard
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Some
He was probably offended by all the horrible negativity aimed at him on
#java.
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Wayland Chan wrote:
> Whatever happened to Ken's effort at documentation? I
> haven't seen him on the list lately. Was wondering if
> he was still working on the docs or if he'd left the
> list/proj
Whatever happened to Ken's effort at documentation? I
haven't seen him on the list lately. Was wondering if
he was still working on the docs or if he'd left the
list/project.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
h
As I recall, Rickard asked the list if anyone was using it; nobody replied
positively, so the need for a migration was assumed to be light.
Assumptions, as usual... erm... let's go into avoid-stupid-aphorisms mode.
This goes back to scope and myopia.
That aside, how SHOULD Paolo's problem be solve
I suppose no one bothered to include some kind of migration path for this
"bugfix" like I said was needed?
Anders Hovmöller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://boxed.killingar.net
- Original Message -
From: "Vedovato Paolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Webwork (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thur
Hi all
we use the webtable ww tag in our application. After installing 1.3.0 rc1
the sorting in our tables in our application doesn't behave correctly
anymore.
After some investigating I saw that the URLTag in the way that POST'ed data
isn't included anymore when the url tag has no value paramet
The issue was already raised as major issue WW-96.
I have attached the patch to it in Jira now.
Cheers,
Dick Zetterberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Farquhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:20 A
Pardon me for my ignorance... but could you possibly provide a high level
detail of what Jasper Reports is, specifically how it integrates in with WW?
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Jan
26 matches
Mail list logo
