Does anyone know anything of JSF and how WW relates/compares?
-Original Message-
From: Butt, Dudley
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] newbie WebWork vs Struts
Hi all,
Pls could I ask some info. I'm currently assessing wether we go with
Hi all,
now that pico stuff have been removed from xwork,
what is the best way to plug pico into xwork ? Reading few Jason's posts on the
pico dev list, it seems near impossible to do it the interceptor way. Is someone
working on an xwork integration for nano ? ( i saw webwork1 stuff in the
For the SiteMesh part, there is a VelocityServlet available which will be
integrated very soon.
For now:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=983807forum_id=4751
Cheers,
Mathias
-Original Message-
From: Christian Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 16 juli
Title: Message
Matt
Ho had integrated Pico into XWork... His approach (the right one I think
considering Pico's... *ahem*... "unique" design constraints) was to replace the
ActionProxyFactory implementation to be able to control Action instantiation.
This still won't fix your serialization
i see there's the petstore example thats been written one in struts and one using WW.
I guess now we can just test them both out! easy easy..
heres the URL http://xpetstore.sourceforge.net/index.html
-Original Message-
From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July
Don't know... It should. Servlet container is probably more of an issue.
-Original Message-
From: Butt, Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:18 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] newbie WebWork vs Struts
will WW run on AIX?
Can somone give a brief overview of what I might use the other products for, as listed
on the OS site
Modules
Production Quality
» OSCore
» PropertySet
» SiteMesh
» OSWorkflow
» OSCache
» OSAccess
NOTICE:
This message contains privileged and confidential information intended
I'm new to this project. Reading through the documentation I
came across a statement that
WW, unlike Struts, is not based on the Servlet API and so can
be used in a java Swing
application. Assuming I have not misread the
documentation statement, can someone who
has actually done this give
Joshua wrote:
I'm new to this project. Reading through the documentation I came across
a statement that
WW, unlike Struts, is not based on the Servlet API and so can be used in
a java Swing
application. Assuming I have not misread the documentation statement,
can someone who
has actually done
Dudley,
Have you read the OS site page for each of those projects? There are
pretty good overviews for each. I think you'll have a pretty good handle
on what the other projects do if you read the intro pages.
Cheers,
--Bill
Butt, Dudley wrote:
Can somone give a brief overview of what I might
Hi again,
Not to sound impatient, but I was just wondering when WW2 would be hitting the OS
shelves..thx
NOTICE:
This message contains privileged and confidential information intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination, copy or
Thanks all for you quick help on an earlier issue today... I've got
another one I can't seem to solve (earlier postings didn't help), here
is the situation:
I have a simple test app I've been trying to build similar to the i18n
example that WebWork ships with, I have the following done:
i was readint through:
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork+2+Migration+Guide
and it mentions:
The new validation framework allows you to pull validation out of your
actions into validator classes. doValidation is no longer called as part of
the execute() of an Action. See the Xwork
I would think that only 1 abstract interceptor is required, though the one
that is provided doesn't allow the after method to respond if there is an
exception.
Its your call.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pat Lightbody
Sent:
Using AOP like language - isn't this really an 'AroundInterceptor'?
M
On 17/7/03 12:32 PM, Cameron Braid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the
words:
I would think that only 1 abstract interceptor is required, though the one
that is provided doesn't allow the after method to respond if there is an
I would call it AroundInterceptor, except there is already one...
The problem with the AroundInterceptor is that the after method doesn't get
called if there is an exception thrown in the action, or a chained
interceptor. Therefore I created a new interceptor to faciliate this.
I suggest that
16 matches
Mail list logo