RE: [OS-webwork] newbie WebWork vs Struts

2003-07-16 Thread Butt, Dudley
Does anyone know anything of JSF and how WW relates/compares? -Original Message- From: Butt, Dudley Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] newbie WebWork vs Struts Hi all, Pls could I ask some info. I'm currently assessing wether we go with

[OS-webwork] Pico/Nano integration and Velocity/Sitemesh

2003-07-16 Thread Christian Meunier
Hi all, now that pico stuff have been removed from xwork, what is the best way to plug pico into xwork ? Reading few Jason's posts on the pico dev list, it seems near impossible to do it the interceptor way. Is someone working on an xwork integration for nano ? ( i saw webwork1 stuff in the

RE: [OS-webwork] Pico/Nano integration and Velocity/Sitemesh

2003-07-16 Thread BOGAERT Mathias
For the SiteMesh part, there is a VelocityServlet available which will be integrated very soon. For now: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=983807forum_id=4751 Cheers, Mathias -Original Message- From: Christian Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 16 juli

RE: [OS-webwork] Pico/Nano integration and Velocity/Sitemesh

2003-07-16 Thread Jason Carreira
Title: Message Matt Ho had integrated Pico into XWork... His approach (the right one I think considering Pico's... *ahem*... "unique" design constraints) was to replace the ActionProxyFactory implementation to be able to control Action instantiation. This still won't fix your serialization

RE: [OS-webwork] newbie WebWork vs Struts

2003-07-16 Thread Butt, Dudley
i see there's the petstore example thats been written one in struts and one using WW. I guess now we can just test them both out! easy easy.. heres the URL http://xpetstore.sourceforge.net/index.html -Original Message- From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July

RE: [OS-webwork] newbie WebWork vs Struts

2003-07-16 Thread Jason Carreira
Don't know... It should. Servlet container is probably more of an issue. -Original Message- From: Butt, Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:18 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] newbie WebWork vs Struts will WW run on AIX?

[OS-webwork] other stuff on opensymphony site

2003-07-16 Thread Butt, Dudley
Can somone give a brief overview of what I might use the other products for, as listed on the OS site Modules Production Quality » OSCore » PropertySet » SiteMesh » OSWorkflow » OSCache » OSAccess NOTICE: This message contains privileged and confidential information intended

[OS-webwork] Webwork in Swing Application?

2003-07-16 Thread Joshua
I'm new to this project. Reading through the documentation I came across a statement that WW, unlike Struts, is not based on the Servlet API and so can be used in a java Swing application. Assuming I have not misread the documentation statement, can someone who has actually done this give

Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork in Swing Application?

2003-07-16 Thread Rickard Öberg
Joshua wrote: I'm new to this project. Reading through the documentation I came across a statement that WW, unlike Struts, is not based on the Servlet API and so can be used in a java Swing application. Assuming I have not misread the documentation statement, can someone who has actually done

Re: [OS-webwork] other stuff on opensymphony site

2003-07-16 Thread Bill Lynch
Dudley, Have you read the OS site page for each of those projects? There are pretty good overviews for each. I think you'll have a pretty good handle on what the other projects do if you read the intro pages. Cheers, --Bill Butt, Dudley wrote: Can somone give a brief overview of what I might

[OS-webwork] Webwork2 status

2003-07-16 Thread Butt, Dudley
Hi again, Not to sound impatient, but I was just wondering when WW2 would be hitting the OS shelves..thx NOTICE: This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, copy or

[OS-webwork] Resource Groups

2003-07-16 Thread sbruton
Thanks all for you quick help on an earlier issue today... I've got another one I can't seem to solve (earlier postings didn't help), here is the situation: I have a simple test app I've been trying to build similar to the i18n example that WebWork ships with, I have the following done:

[OS-webwork] doValidation no more?

2003-07-16 Thread Francisco Hernandez
i was readint through: http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork+2+Migration+Guide and it mentions: The new validation framework allows you to pull validation out of your actions into validator classes. doValidation is no longer called as part of the execute() of an Action. See the Xwork

RE: [OS-webwork] BeforeAfterInterceptor

2003-07-16 Thread Cameron Braid
I would think that only 1 abstract interceptor is required, though the one that is provided doesn't allow the after method to respond if there is an exception. Its your call. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pat Lightbody Sent:

Re: [OS-webwork] BeforeAfterInterceptor

2003-07-16 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
Using AOP like language - isn't this really an 'AroundInterceptor'? M On 17/7/03 12:32 PM, Cameron Braid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words: I would think that only 1 abstract interceptor is required, though the one that is provided doesn't allow the after method to respond if there is an

RE: [OS-webwork] BeforeAfterInterceptor

2003-07-16 Thread Cameron Braid
I would call it AroundInterceptor, except there is already one... The problem with the AroundInterceptor is that the after method doesn't get called if there is an exception thrown in the action, or a chained interceptor. Therefore I created a new interceptor to faciliate this. I suggest that