Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time?

2003-07-18 Thread Lars Fischer
Initially, just CVS. It's upto each module owner/developers to decide if they want to move or not. Basically I think the idea is to get rid of dependencies on sourceforge, since they're, well, a shit service. Is OpenSymphony and Atlassian also a s*** service ? SF.net servers have been more

Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time?

2003-07-18 Thread Hani Suleiman
As someone once said, I could shit on your doorstep then proclaim that I did it for free. i will then sit back and wait for you to express gratitude for my free gift. On Friday, July 18, 2003, at 09:11 AM, Lars Fischer wrote: Initially, just CVS. It's upto each module owner/developers to

Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time?

2003-07-18 Thread Lars Fischer
As someone once said, I could shit on your doorstep then proclaim that I did it for free. i will then sit back and wait for you to express gratitude for my free gift. Maybe you're using the OS counterpart of sf.net: Windows ? Never had any problems with Linux ... On Friday, July 18,

Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time?

2003-07-18 Thread Joseph Ottinger
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: As someone once said, I could shit on your doorstep then proclaim that I did it for free. i will then sit back and wait for you to express gratitude for my free gift. Maybe you're using the OS counterpart of sf.net: Windows ? Never had any

Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time? [OFFTOPIC]

2003-07-18 Thread Hani Suleiman
It's really hard to stop myself from degenerating into being incredibly abusive. I'll give you some tips though: 1) Just because someone disagrees with you, it doesn't mean they're using windows. 2) linux is not perfect, nor is it that amazing. 3) sourceforge CVS is utterly useless for

[OS-webwork] Pattern for ensuring a logged-in user

2003-07-18 Thread Greinke, Ross
Title: Message Is there a simple WebWork pattern that helps to ensure that a user has gone thru the normal login page? Since browsers allow one to save the URL to some page deep in my application, a user can try to pop back into a page with a new browser window without having started at my

Re: [OS-webwork] Pattern for ensuring a logged-in user

2003-07-18 Thread Sebastiano Pilla
At 09.06 18/07/2003 -0500, Greinke, Ross wrote: Is there a simple WebWork pattern that helps to ensure that a user has gone thru the normal login page? Not a WebWork specific thing, but what about the security constraints offered by any servlet container? You configure those constraints in the

Re: [OS-webwork] /x?.FPMB.CB5DBc-.QPBMXPw.a

2003-07-18 Thread Pat Lightbody
If you can provide this that would be awesome! - Original Message - From: Robert Carlens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:52 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] /x?.FPMB.CB5DBc-.QPBMXPw.a Is there anyone out there who has started implementing the WebTable-tag

Re: [OS-webwork] Xwork Components in WebWork2

2003-07-18 Thread Pat Lightbody
Components in XWork's IoC container are constructed lazily -- so yes, an ActionContext should exist. Configuration is looked up from the classpath -- you'll need to override the ApplicationLifecycleListener to change that. -Pat - Original Message - From: Cameron Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork in Swing Application?

2003-07-18 Thread Pat Lightbody
Ben, We'd love to see this opened in a jira case so that we can include it in the upcoming WebWork 2.0.0 release. -Pat - Original Message - From: Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:34 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork in Swing Application?

RE: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time?

2003-07-18 Thread Cameron Braid
That sounds like a great idea. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pat Lightbody Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2003 1:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time? The plan is to move CVS to

RE: [OS-webwork] Pattern for ensuring a logged-in user

2003-07-18 Thread Jason Carreira
I know that Mike and the Atlassian guys are going to be releasing their security framework as opensource... It uses OSUser, I think, so it can plug into different servlet containers and add enhanced security features. Maybe we can hear from them when this will drop as opensource? Jason

Re: [OS-webwork] Resource Groups

2003-07-18 Thread sbruton
Figured it out, my action class wasn't implementing SessionAware... SessionAware seems to be deprecated however I can not find a suitable replacement in the API docs... On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:31:10AM -0700, Pat Lightbody wrote: Sounds like you're using WebWork 1.3? I'm not that familiar

Re: [OS-webwork] Resource Groups

2003-07-18 Thread Joseph Ottinger
As I was abruptly told by ... um... someone, use ActionContext to get the session stuff: ActionContext.getContext().getSession(); // etc On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Figured it out, my action class wasn't implementing SessionAware... SessionAware seems to be deprecated

Re: [OS-webwork] Pattern for ensuring a logged-in user

2003-07-18 Thread Anders Engström
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:06:00AM -0500, Greinke, Ross wrote: Is there a simple WebWork pattern that helps to ensure that a user has gone thru the normal login page? [snip] You could do what Sebastiano suggested - letting the J2EE Container based security handle this for you. Another

Re: [OS-webwork] Pattern for ensuring a logged-in user

2003-07-18 Thread Francisco Hernandez
what about using a filter to check if the user is logged in and if hes not have it forward him to a login page - Original Message - From: Greinke, Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:31 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Pattern for ensuring a logged-in

[OS-webwork] PARCELAS PUNTA DE CHOROS O $2.000.000 SOLO JULIO Consulte Facilidades

2003-07-18 Thread Tu Tierra
Title: Punta de ChorosParcelas 5075 M2 Solo $2.000.000 Consulte facilidades OFERTA DE INVIERNO PARCELAS PUNTA DE CHOROS

Re: [OS-webwork] Resource Groups

2003-07-18 Thread Cuong Tran
Did you try ActionContext.getContext().getSession() ? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Figured it out, my action class wasn't implementing SessionAware... SessionAware seems to be deprecated however I can not find a suitable replacement in the API docs... On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at