Re: [OS-webwork] porting webwork1.3 examples to webwork2

2003-07-21 Thread Francisco Hernandez
since no one responded to my post im going to assume no one has started on doing this.. just double checking because if no one has or has plans to i'd like to do this. - Original Message - From: Francisco Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003

[OS-webwork] webwork2 tags not working in sitemeshed pages

2003-07-21 Thread Francisco Hernandez
I dont know if this is a webwork issue or sitemesh issue but I cant use webwork tags in sitemesh in decorators.xml: decorator name=main page=main.jsp pattern*/pattern /decorator in this main.jsp page is where I cant use ww2 tags at all.. calling ww:property/ throws an exception

RE: [OS-webwork] webwork2 tags not working in sitemeshed pages

2003-07-21 Thread Cameron Braid
I have sitemesh and webwork2 working perfectly... And I didn't do anything abnormal to get it to work. One thing ... Are you using the webwork actions from within a decorator ? If so, then you may run into problems, as the decorator is applied after the result is executed, therefore there is no

RE: [OS-webwork] webwork2 tags not working in sitemeshed pages

2003-07-21 Thread Jason Carreira
There is no workaround for this that I can think of. This is inherent to the way Sitemesh works. It uses the fully rendered page to pull from. -Original Message- From: Cameron Braid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 5:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

RE: [OS-webwork] webwork2 tags not working in sitemeshed pages

2003-07-21 Thread Cameron Braid
One way ( bit of a hack ) that I can think of it is to * store the action context (or something like that) in the request (or it may even need to be session) scope when the ServletDispatcher is finished * provide a jsp tag to create a dummy action context within the decorator. So in your

[OS-webwork] web.xml in CVS

2003-07-21 Thread Matthew E . Porter
Can someone please change the web.xml in WW2 CVS? The classes are still pointing to the Pico implementations. Cheers, matthew --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single

Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time?

2003-07-21 Thread Pat Lightbody
Yes, history is lost -- I'll email the java.net people and see if there is anything they can do. -Pat - Original Message - From: Bill Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 8:16 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time? All,

[OS-webwork] User counter

2003-07-21 Thread Tim Mach
Greetings. I am a new WW2 user and am excited about the upcoming release. I have a question. I see that there is a counter example in the examples directory. How can I use this to get a count of visitors and/or real users to my site? Thanks. Tim __ Do you

RE: [OS-webwork] User counter

2003-07-21 Thread Jason Carreira
Well, it can be part of a solution, but you should use a database, or some persistent storage. Look at the IoC stuff for examples of how to use a component to access your persistent backend storage. -Original Message- From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July

Re: [OS-webwork] User counter

2003-07-21 Thread Pat Lightbody
Well, that is something that you can do by storing a domain object in the application's ServletContext. That isn't neccessarily anything unique to WebWork, although it can be done via Inversion of Control, just like the Counter example does. But again, this isn't anything unique to WebWork, so I

Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time?

2003-07-21 Thread Joseph Ottinger
Well, I personally find SF's anonymous CVS highly annoying - move WW 1.x too, and let's get a new release out. On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Dick Zetterberg wrote: If it is not possible to get the complete history then I agree with Bill and think that WW1.x CVS should stay at SF. Since the original

Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time?

2003-07-21 Thread Pat Lightbody
I've emailed java.net asking about migration that includes revision history... - Original Message - From: Joseph Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:44 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Sourceforge CVS down all the time? Well, I personally find

Re: [OS-webwork] webwork2 tags not working in sitemeshed pages

2003-07-21 Thread Francisco Hernandez
unforetunately for me im not familiar enough with webwork to do this myself, i think it would be a good thing to be able to use webwork in decorator pages though, so im going to put this in a jira request - Original Message - From: Cameron Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[OS-webwork] [JIRA-Opensymphony] Created: (WW-232) ability to use webwork2 tags in sitemesh decorator pages

2003-07-21 Thread legendaryservice
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-232 Here is an overview of the issue:

[OS-webwork] WW1.3 Null Values Not Read from Properties

2003-07-21 Thread Peter Kelley
I have just finished looking at a bug in our product code that uses WW1.3 and I have tracked it down to the Value Stack. On the value stack are two objects each with a property of the same name. The property in the object on the top of the stack is null. When the code in the ValueStack class runs

Re: [OS-webwork] webwork2 tags not working in sitemeshed pages

2003-07-21 Thread Francisco Hernandez
ok i made a hack so the ww2 tags work in my sitemesh decorators.. can soemone tell me if I went about this the correct way to go about this or not? in my servletdispatcher i put a new line: request.setAttribute(MyActionContext,ActionContext.getContext()); so now its: ActionProxy

RE: [OS-webwork] webwork2 tags not working in sitemeshed pages

2003-07-21 Thread Jason Carreira
You need to make sure this ActionContext gets cleaned up when you're done with it, or it will remain associated with the thread for the next request. -Original Message- From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]