Hi we still have a problem with URLTag. I did a update this morning. i get
this error:
/test/demo/DemoFormStep1.jsp(1): Error in using tag library uri='webwork'
prefix='ww': The Tag class 'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag' has
no setter method corresponding to TLD declared attribute
URLTag has no page property whereas the taglib.tld definas a page parameter
for the ww:url tag.
/Daniel
taglib.zip
Description: Binary data
Forgot to mention that a fixed TLD is attached to my previous mail.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Pfeifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 19 november 2003 09:58
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [OS-webwork] Taglib.tld doesn't match structure of actual Tag
classes
URLTag has no
--- Drew McAuliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My biggest problem with this is that it basically
eliminates any advantage
to using velocity as far as ease of use is
concerned. One of the main
reasons I prefer velocity over JSP is that the
syntax is more natural,
especially for things like
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 5:35 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Page attribute gone
I made the URLTag exactly like the 1.3/1.4 release. In fact, in 1.4 the
page attribute does exist, but it is
This patch removes the warning from the war task from the inclusion of a
web.xml in the .war. If we end up putting a sample web.xml that's
actually meant for inclusion as content, we'll need to change the exclude
slightly.
---
Joseph
Hi all,
How can I create a select-control with an Integer list-key and have the
action property the key set to null when no item has been selected
(iemptyOption-parameter is set)? This causes a conversion-error in
XWorkConverter since it treats a -value as illegal for an Integer
field. I
Hi, about setting stylesheet on UI tags. See below input tag that i would
like to have by using the ww:textfield tag for ex.
input type=text name=test class=input style=width:160px;
vertical-align:top
is there a way to add this functionality in the ww:textfield tag? or should
you do it throgh
Shouldn't the DTD for xwork be on the opensymphony site?
---
Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com
IT Consultant[EMAIL PROTECTED]
J2EE Editor - Java Developer's Journal
what about using headerKey=0 headerValue=Select Country
assuming you can use 0 as a key..
Dag Liodden wrote:
Hi all,
How can I create a select-control with an Integer list-key and have the
action property the key set to null when no item has been selected
(iemptyOption-parameter is set)? This
Or -1, but it's semantically wrong since nothing is selected and we're
dealing with primitive wrappers where null actually has a meaning. :)
When nothing is selected, the value *should* be null... No biggie,
though. :)
D
Francisco Hernandez wrote:
what about using headerKey=0
I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is
finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a
final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm
currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't
include the source for
Yes, looks like weblogic doesn't like the shipped tld, so please use
the one that Daniel sent. I'll be updating the one in cvs shortly.
On Nov 19, 2003, at 3:57 AM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
URLTag has no page property whereas the taglib.tld definas a page
parameter
for the ww:url tag.
/Daniel
whatever happened to your plan for writing some documentation every day
for one month? :)
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is
finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a
final release that we hope will take
I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic
(taglib.tld).
Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server
(unimportant for OpenSymphony developers).
I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is
finally out. This release
Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue
myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as
mine.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote:
I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic
(taglib.tld).
Maybe the final
I mailed a fixed taglib.tld to the mailing list earlier. Use it and it'll
work.
/Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 19 november 2003 15:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Lars, WHAT about the
Joseph,
it's the problem where somone already provided a patch:
weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library
uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class
'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag' has no setter method corresponding to TLD
declared attribute 'page', (JSP
remove
-Original Message-
From: Hani Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Nov 18, 2003 8:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Newbie - CDList.jsp
have a look at the webwork.examples.i18n.CDList class. That is the
action class, so when the page makes a call to CDList, that
Daniel,
thanks, I've used it before beta 2.
Regards,
Lars
I mailed a fixed taglib.tld to the mailing list earlier. Use it and it'll
work.
/Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 19 november 2003 15:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What are the exceptions? The URLTag recently was modified to act just
like 1.3.
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pfeifer
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 5:38 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [OS-webwork] Problems with
Can you file issues for these? They all work on Orion.
Lars Fischer wrote:
Joseph,
it's the problem where somone already provided a patch:
weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library
uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class
Oh hang on, this looks like it's a 2.0 issue, that jasperreports isn't
working. It should work fine in 1.4!
Lars Fischer wrote:
Joseph,
it's the problem where somone already provided a patch:
weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library
uri='webwork' prefix='ww':
We all know that Orion is way too forgiving about errors against specs.
Weblogic tends to moan more. Jboss is descriptor compliance nirvana.
Mathias
-Original Message-
From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 19 november 2003 15:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Well, there is no page setter in the URLTag class but in the taglib.tld
there is an attribute called page. Weblogic doesn't like that. But that i
mentoined earlier today and posted a fixed taglib.tld to the mailing list.
As for the IncludeTag it throws an exception saying following: Since tag
Oh hang on, this looks like it's a 2.0 issue, that jasperreports isn't
working. It should work fine in 1.4!
It should ...
The first report was about WW 2.0 but I just tested 1.4 with WebLogic 8.1
(see below).
This is based on deploying the provided 'webwork.war'.
Ok, thanks. I'll test and make sure it works.
Lars Fischer wrote:
Oh hang on, this looks like it's a 2.0 issue, that jasperreports isn't
working. It should work fine in 1.4!
It should ...
The first report was about WW 2.0 but I just tested 1.4 with WebLogic 8.1
(see below).
This is based on
Are you referencing the Jasper reports servlet in your web.xml? If so,
remove that.
Mathias
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 19 november 2003 16:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Oh hang on,
It's not XWorkBasicConverter but XWorkConverter.
-Message d'origine-
De : Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoye : mercredi 19 novembre 2003 16:45
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : WW2beta2 htmlEncode problem
Adding $webwork.htmlEncode to rewrite some values brings a serious problem
Is there an IRC channel dedicated to webwork anywhere, where one could
bring up issues and questions without annoying the struts/GUI/etc people?
---
Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com
IT Consultant
Your best bet is #java on EFNet and hope one of the developers are online. Hani, Pat
and a couple of others are on there quite often.
Is there an IRC channel dedicated to webwork anywhere, where one could
bring up issues and questions without annoying the struts/GUI/etc people?
Yeah, but that'll annoy everyone else. :)
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Wayland Chan wrote:
Your best bet is #java on EFNet and hope one of the developers are online. Hani, Pat
and a couple of others are on there quite often.
Is there an IRC channel dedicated to webwork anywhere, where one could
Adding $webwork.htmlEncode to rewrite some values brings a serious problem
for me. For instance, when you call $!webwork.htmlEncode($itemKey) in the
select.vm template, you seem to think $itemKey is inevitably a string when
you have written the htmlEncode method. That's not the case, what about an
theres about 8 people or so who usually are on the freenode.net servers.
Jonas Eriksson wrote:
I have no idea if there are any people in these, but they have been
mentioned on the list for not so long ago:
irc.freenode.net #webwork
irc.werken.com #webwork
Joseph Ottinger wrote:
Is there an IRC
We're having an issue with our WW2 application and we're not sure
whether it's a bug or a feature.
In a text field, enter reg; and click Save once. It returns us to the
form, but now instead of the text reg; we see the Registered symbol.
Viewing the source of the web page, shows that it is
It's supposed to be escaping them... Which version are you using, the
new beta2?
-Original Message-
From: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] escaping text in text fields
We're having
I downloaded from CVS this morning and built it, and the resulting jar
was labeled beta 2, so I'm assuming yes.
Where would the escaping code be so I can look into whether it's
actually happening?
Anoop
On Nov 19, 2003, at 3:54 PM, Jason Carreira wrote:
It's supposed to be escaping them...
over at the freenode channel, we'er a small but growing number of ww2
users. i for one could definitely use more heads to ask questions and
bounce ideas off of.
hope to see you there,
-a
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 12:52, Francisco Hernandez wrote:
theres about 8 people or so who usually are on the
How do I get request params in my interceptor?
Say I have a url of, http://blah/myAction.action?myParam=foo
In my interceptor I tried:
ActionContext ctx = ActionContext.getContext();
String myParam = (String)ctx.get(myParam);
myParam was null.
Thanks,
Paul
I'm looking in the code, and it appears that PropertyTag is the only UI
tag that supports escaping. The TextFieldTag doesn't make any attempt
to escape as far as I can see.
Anoop
On Nov 19, 2003, at 3:54 PM, Jason Carreira wrote:
It's supposed to be escaping them... Which version are you
Somebody mentioned that my problem is because there's already a
.project in the repository. My question is assuming Ant is used to
build webwork 1.4 can the .cvsignore
include that .project file so that Eclipse doesn't see it? Is the
.project file that's in the repository meant to be public?
Ok, I can get the param with ActionContext.getContext().getParameters().
But when I try to cast the object returned from the param Map to a String I get a
class cast exception.
Check this out.
Map params = ctx.getParameters();
Object objMyParam = params.get(myParam);
log.finer(objMyParam class
It's a string array, so casting to String[] will work, which makes sense
since you can have multiple params with the same name.
Paul Knepper wrote:
Ok, I can get the param with ActionContext.getContext().getParameters().
But when I try to cast the object returned from the param Map to a String
I agree with this, but I think removing this file would cause people a
lot of heartache when cvs updating, they might need to recreate their
project and so on.
Checking in IDE files is a pretty bad idea IMHO, it's utterly trivial to
set up a project in your IDE of choice. I'd love to remove
I'd also like to see the IDE-specific files removed. Mainly because the
eclipse ones don't work for me, and I have to recreate project settings
anyway. Also, there's the question of different IDE versions (at least in
Eclipse, though I'm not sure how variant the project files are b/w 2.x and
3).
Ross Mason wrote:
Cameron Braid wrote:
Ross Mason wrote:
Cameron Braid wrote:
I have downloaded and integrated this code though and the tests run
perfectly (after creating my my own ServletContextAware interface
and removing refrences to the confluence packages)
I really like the work
what do you guys think of adding somekind of way to specify what the
validation method to use in the validation interceptor?
right now it just uses validate() and is called on every action, but
sometimes not all actions use that same validate method, so what i'd
like to do is convert a action
Title: Just upgraded to WW2beta2 and now my validation is broken...
Hi gang,
I've updated all my UI tags to wrap literal values that I don't want evaluated in single quotes but my previously working validation is flat out broken. Not only is every submit rejected as invalid, but the field
put quotes in the name attributes of your ui tags.
Peter White wrote:
Hi gang,
I've updated all my UI tags to wrap literal values that I don't want
evaluated in single quotes but my previously working validation is flat
out broken. Not only is every submit rejected as invalid, but the field
i have a field of type Date, if i put in junk as the input ill get this
message:
Invalid field value for field user.dob.
how can i change this message to something more friendly like
Please input a value for Date of Birth, example: 03/18/1980)
50 matches
Mail list logo
