Message-
From: Rick Salsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork2 Problems.
I seem to be having a really wierd problem that I can't seem
to figure out.
I've got an Action class which is making calls on
Sorry, but my home account's mail server has been down all day, so I
don't know if it got through. So hear it is again. If someone answered
earlier, could you please forward me that email? Thanks!
I seem to be having a really wierd problem that I can't seem to figure out.
I've got an Action cla
I seem to be having a really wierd problem that I can't seem to figure out.
I've got an Action class which is making calls on an domain object. The
snippet in the action class:
public Order getOrder() {
return order;
}
and the input field in the form:
The field is being set properly, bu
The request parameters are in
the valuestack, so I believe the syntax to search the stack is #foo.
/rick
Nils Hartmann wrote:
Hi,
I'm still looking for a way to access request parameters from WW2-tags,
like in WW1 . The only thread about
this issue in the mailing list is from june and u
Having not read the whole
thread, would it be possible for you to make that component implement
ServletContextListener as well? Then do the initializations in
contextInitialized?
Mathias has something like this, in that it uses ww2's IoC, but the
class isn't a component in any of the different
Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
> I have to pass parameters from JSP page to an action through another
>action. I am specifying the action tag in the actions.xml but i dont know
>how to send parameters.
You'll have to use the Chaining Interceptor. Here's the snippet from the
XWork d
Bernard,
You should just be able to just call your id and name getters:
and it should call getId() and getName()
/rick
---
This SF.net email is sponso
> I've made the changes to the code and as yet have not checked them in
as
> there's something odd going on with the BeanTag. Once I figure out
what
> the issue with BeanTag is, I'll check in the changes.
What seems to be the issue?
rick
---
I just noticed that Matt made a number of changes to the ww2 tags,
primarily implementing the release method to reset state. Is there any
particular reason for doing this?
If we want to reset those values, release is not the best place for it.
Here are some points for the Jakarta taglibs site:
-
"Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've noticed that the taglibs in WW2 can't be reused properly (values
aren't
>reset to null, so they provide for some VERY strange behavior).
What kind of problems are you having?
rick
---
T
"Jason Carreira" wrote:
>Ok, I checked this in. I took out the stuff that was parsing for '#'. If
>it's needed later, we can put it in. I also cleaned up a few other
>spots. Everyone please let me know if it works / doesn't work for you.
It works well for me. There are no problems with using name
sday, March 25, 2003 10:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WW2 Action Context
>
> Ok, excuse me, but we trimmed off too much of this conversation So
> what's the problem? Is it still a problem?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: R
>
> What does createActionContext() do?
It's just a private method that's suppose to create a new ActionContext
if one isn't created.
rick
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Inte
A question about the ActionContext class, when I do the following:
OgnlValueStack stack = ActionContext.getContext().getValueStack();
It will never return null, even if an ActionContext has yet to be
created. This causes a problem in the BeanTag that I'm trying to port
over. If the BeanTag is run
+1
I believe that it is #foo.bar in Ognl.
/rick
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jason Carreira
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 2:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Action Tag
>
> Ok. I did some thinking abou
If I remember correctly, it was donated by someone you developed it at
Sprint, which is why the license is still there. It should be in the
list archives. It was mentioned around the time when Matt added the
Multi-part support to ww.
rick
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [
+1
Also, I just checked out cvs and the Action tag isn't working for me.
Anyone else having this problem?
It will work when it's executed from a view, but doesn't work if called
from a jsp that isn't a view. I'm getting NullPointers:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
com.opensymphony.xw
> > The other issue I ran into was the absence of many of
> > the WW 1.0 JSP tags - url, action and bean in
> > particular. The roadmap makes no mention of these and
> > I couldn't find details in the archives so I'll just
> > ask: what are the status of these tags - deprecated,
> > not yet implem
Hey Jason and Pat,
I've got working ww:else and ww:elseif tags for ww 2.0. Where shall I post
these? Should I create a Jira task for them and mark them as an
improvement?
rick
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now op
BTW, I don't see the class in CVS? Has it been added yet?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.source
> Well, you'd be "set"-ing it into one of x scopes :-)
Yeah, yeah, I guess you're right. I just think it may have the potential
to be a confusing tag if not documented properly. Someone could mistake
it like this:
I know in ww 1.x we use param, but someone could easily mistake it for a
s
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Cameron Braid
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 6:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WW2: JSTL, JSF, and SaveProperty
>
> I think ww:set is the best yet
What about scope? Aren't
Hi all,
I noticed on Jira
(http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-119) that
Matt Ho posted some code which uses Velocity for the ui tags (damn! You
beat me to it Matt ;-)). Is anyone going to post this to cvs? I've tried
it out with a fresh copy from CVS (earlier today) and ever
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jason Carreira
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Re: Webwork 2.0 example app
>
> Speaking of Wiki's, did anyone else see this:
>
> http://
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jason Carreira
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Re: Webwork 2.0 example app
>
> Of course, you also inherit their architecture, which can
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jason Carreira
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
>
> Definitely Sitemesh and OSCache
+1 to both of these and
Hi Guys,
I'm experience some wierd behaviour (well, to me anyway) with BeanUtil.
I've got an Action class that is called from a form. In that form, I have a
select box with multiple selections. In my Action class, I have something
similar to the following:
public void setTitles(String[] titles)
I believe you also have to implement CommandAware.
rick
Java Lamer wrote:
Scott,
I did just that but it still going right through and call my
doExecute() instead of the doDefault(). Am I missing anything in my
setup? My action extends ActionSupport and implements SessionAware.
T
28 matches
Mail list logo
