, 2003 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Add PushTag to WW1.3
Please make sure that the PushTag uses the same interface (or even
better, code) that 2.0 uses.
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dick Zetterberg
Sent: Wednesday
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dick Zetterberg
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Add PushTag to WW1.3
The tag was added last week. The interface is the same as in WW2. As far
as the code is concerned I prefer code that is correct. ;-)
Cheers,
Dick
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Add PushTag to WW1.3
OK, well if the code in 2.0 isn't correct, please let me know. It's
pretty counterintuitive to keep me in the dark on changes that hurt
compatibility, especially since I just spent a great deal of my time
trying to do so.
-Pat
-Original
(even an hour) and so any process that can help me
out is greatly appreciated.
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dick Zetterberg
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Add PushTag to WW1.3
Ww:property still does the print in WW2... Ww:set can be used to set values into
scopes (the other usage of ww:property in ww1.x)
-Original Message-
From: boxed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Add
Go for it!
On Nov 5, 2003, at 12:00 PM, Dick Zetterberg wrote:
Hi there,
I would like to add a push tag to the 1.3 branch and I just want to
check that there are no objections to this.
Why do I want to add it when we can do the same with the property tag
already?
Because the property tag is
Hi there,
I would like to add a push tag to the 1.3 branch and I just want to check that there
are no objections to this.
Why do I want to add it when we can do the same with the property tag already?
Because the property tag is inefficient when used for this purpose. This is because it
