ainer...
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] ObjectFactory
>
>
> Would this be of interest of someone wanted populate their
> actions from the databas
Would this be of interest of someone wanted populate their actions from
the database instead of the xwork.xml ? We have toying around with the
idea of user customized actions, but weren't sure if xwork would be a
candidate for this.
thanks,
Matt
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 02:40, Jason Carreira wro
Title: Message
I've implemented an
ObjectFactory in CVS head in XWork and WebWork... The method signatures may
still evolve a bit, especially the errors thrown, but it should be a good place
to start... People looking to integrate IoC containers, this should make things
easier. Looking for f
Mate,
Great email - thoughts below:
> Several people have been asking about replacing the clazz.newInstance() calls
> in XWork with object factories which can be replaced, to allow integration
> with Spring/Pico/etc... While I'm all for this, I think there are some issues
> that need to be thoug
Jason Carreira wrote:
One question I had about these frameworks... Is it possible for me to
define a default configuration, and allow the users of the framework to
just selectively replace individual components, or would they have to
reconfigure the whole thing?
Thoughts? Ideas?
One design tha
ch out parts and replace them
with what they need, but more than that is probably unnecessary and
undesirable.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason CarreiraSent: Monday, February 23, 2004 6:09
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[OS-webwork] ObjectFactory / XWork int
Title: Message
Several people have
been asking about replacing the clazz.newInstance() calls in XWork with object
factories which can be replaced, to allow integration with Spring/Pico/etc...
While I'm all for this, I think there are some issues that need to be thought
through so we can get
