--- Drew McAuliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My biggest problem with this is that it basically
eliminates any advantage
to using velocity as far as ease of use is
concerned. One of the main
reasons I prefer velocity over JSP is that the
syntax is more natural,
especially for things like
:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
As I said in another reply, the biggest problem is that you can't use an
object variable in velocity, since it always gets converted to a string
first. If I have a collection of model objects, and want to call a
component
tag
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de
Francisco Hernandez
Envoye : mardi 18 novembre 2003 08:33
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [OS-webwork] Param directive
why create another property tag instead of just adding an attribute to
handle escaping (which
: [OS-webwork] Param directive
As I said in another reply, the biggest problem is that you can't use an
object variable in velocity, since it always gets converted to a string
first. If I have a collection of model objects, and want to call a component
tag with them in an iteration through
Fred Lamuette wrote:
I dont think two #param directives are a good idea.
What about a default behaviour defined in the webwork.properties ? With an
attribute in param tag to override the default, it would be nice.
This is now done in CVS. The param supports an optional eval attribute.
If eval
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de
Drew McAuliffe
Envoye : mardi 18 novembre 2003 00:15
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
As I said in another reply, the biggest problem is that you can't use an
object variable in velocity, since it always gets converted to a string
first
de
Francisco Hernandez
Envoye : mardi 18 novembre 2003 11:21
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [OS-webwork] Param directive
what if in your example you needed 2 objects to be avaiable in your
Component?
would a ww:set be needed?
Fred Lamuette wrote:
Here is the different point of view. I
That would be fine by me. Being able to set the default would be especially
nice.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred
Lamuette
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
I
, but if it doesn't need to get involved, it shouldn't.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred
Lamuette
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
Here is the different point of view
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
what if in your example you needed 2 objects to be avaiable in your
Component?
double push
would a ww:set be needed?
???
Richard HALLIER
Chef de projet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
01.40.12.41.52
www.uniclick.org
UNICLICK
-Message
Of Fred
Lamuette
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
Here is the different point of view. I personnaly think the push/pop actions
are NOT a hack.
Either you have a WW2 approach or a Velocity one. I think we are in the
first one
PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [OS-webwork] Param directive
+1, the valuestack is a neat thing and all that, but having random
pushs/pops happen in UI tags of all things just feels wrong.
Drew McAuliffe wrote:
My biggest problem with this is that it basically eliminates any advantage
to using velocity
Hani Suleiman wrote:
+1, the valuestack is a neat thing and all that, but having random
pushs/pops happen in UI tags of all things just feels wrong.
Agreed. However, I'm unclear why pushes and pops are required though.
#foreach( $number in $person.phoneNumbers )
$stack.push($number)
).
OR something else?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Ho
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Param directive
Hani Suleiman wrote:
+1, the valuestack is a neat thing and all that, but having
I think we're going with what's in CVS unless there's bugs...
-Original Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 4:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
The pushes and pops were necessary before
Having the latest XWork+WW2 cvs snapshot, I can notice a behavior change for
the param directive.
Before
#param(paramName paramValue) - store in the parameters list, the value
OgnlValueStack.findValue(paramValue)
From now
#param(paramName paramValue) - store in the parameters list, the value
I believe some people asked for it to be that way as it's more natural
for a Velocity context... I may be wrong though..
-Original Message-
From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Param
$stack.findValue behind the scenes in the directive allows for more
powerful, expressive templates.
Drew
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred
Lamuette
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Param
Fred Lamuette wrote:
As far as I am concerned this approach is not the correct one ! I explain my
point of view with an example :
With the latest XWork+WW2 cvs snapshot, you can write a select tag both ways
:
1/
#tag(Select name='nameValue' ...) - in this case, the parameter with
key=name and
that's a fair tradeoff.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred
Lamuette
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 9:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
As far as I am concerned this approach is not the correct one ! I
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Drew McAuliffe
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
As I said in another reply, the biggest problem is that you can't use an
object variable in velocity, since it always gets converted to a string
21 matches
Mail list logo
