; I thought the point was to get us ready to release 1.3? I don't think we
> > want to add EVERYTHING, or we'll never get 1.3 out the door :-)
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Sunday,
ED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] RC2
>
> 1.3.0 RC2 has been released. This release includes
> important performance enhancements.
>
> -Matt
>
>
> ---
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
> ar
1.3.0 RC2 has been released. This release includes
important performance enhancements.
-Matt
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide
was to get us ready to release 1.3? I don't think we
> want to add EVERYTHING, or we'll never get 1.3 out the door :-)
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 10:12 PM
>> To: [
L PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] RC2?
>
>
> I vote for all features going into RC2. That's kinda the
> point of an RC rather than a final release - so people can
> test the new features? :)
>
> -mike
>
> On 20/1/03 1:50 PM, "Jason Carreira"
ed ones) going into RC2...
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 7:14 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] RC2?
>>
>>
>> Does RC2 have to be the same fe
+1 as well.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 6:50 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] RC2?
> I'd vote for new features (small, well tested ones) going into RC2...
>
> &
I'd vote for new features (small, well tested ones) going into RC2...
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 7:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] RC2?
>
>
> Does RC2 ha
Does RC2 have to be the same features as RC1 but with fixed bugs or can
extra features (Jasper Reports enhancements) be included.
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 11:33, matt baldree wrote:
> Are we ready to push out another release candidate? I think it would
> be nice to get the recent performance patches
can
the modification of the url tag be considered (see corresponding thread and the
proposal of eric) for RC2?
-paolo
-Original Message-From: matt baldree
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:34
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[OS-webwork] RC2
Title: Re: [OS-webwork] RC2?
I’m all for it!
-mike
On 17/1/03 11:33 AM, "matt baldree" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words:
Are we ready to push out another release candidate? I think it would be nice to get the recent performance patches out the door.
-Matt
Are we ready to push out another release candidate?
I think it would be nice to get the recent performance patches out the
door.
-Matt
12 matches
Mail list logo