Re: [OS-webwork] RC2?

2003-01-20 Thread Peter Kelley
; I thought the point was to get us ready to release 1.3? I don't think we > > want to add EVERYTHING, or we'll never get 1.3 out the door :-) > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> Sent: Sunday,

RE: [OS-webwork] RC2

2003-01-19 Thread Matt Ho
ED] > Subject: [OS-webwork] RC2 > > 1.3.0 RC2 has been released. This release includes > important performance enhancements. > > -Matt > > > --- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte > ar

[OS-webwork] RC2

2003-01-19 Thread matt
1.3.0 RC2 has been released. This release includes important performance enhancements. -Matt --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide

Re: [OS-webwork] RC2?

2003-01-19 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
was to get us ready to release 1.3? I don't think we > want to add EVERYTHING, or we'll never get 1.3 out the door :-) > >> -Original Message- >> From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 10:12 PM >> To: [

RE: [OS-webwork] RC2?

2003-01-19 Thread Jason Carreira
L PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] RC2? > > > I vote for all features going into RC2. That's kinda the > point of an RC rather than a final release - so people can > test the new features? :) > > -mike > > On 20/1/03 1:50 PM, "Jason Carreira"

Re: [OS-webwork] RC2?

2003-01-19 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
ed ones) going into RC2... > >> -Original Message- >> From: Peter Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 7:14 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] RC2? >> >> >> Does RC2 have to be the same fe

Re: [OS-webwork] RC2?

2003-01-19 Thread Patrick Lightbody
+1 as well. - Original Message - From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 6:50 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] RC2? > I'd vote for new features (small, well tested ones) going into RC2... > > &

RE: [OS-webwork] RC2?

2003-01-19 Thread Jason Carreira
I'd vote for new features (small, well tested ones) going into RC2... > -Original Message- > From: Peter Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 7:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] RC2? > > > Does RC2 ha

Re: [OS-webwork] RC2?

2003-01-19 Thread Peter Kelley
Does RC2 have to be the same features as RC1 but with fixed bugs or can extra features (Jasper Reports enhancements) be included. On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 11:33, matt baldree wrote: > Are we ready to push out another release candidate? I think it would > be nice to get the recent performance patches

RE: [OS-webwork] RC2?

2003-01-17 Thread Vedovato Paolo
can the modification of the url tag be considered (see corresponding thread and the proposal of eric) for RC2?   -paolo     -Original Message-From: matt baldree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:34 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork] RC2

Re: [OS-webwork] RC2?

2003-01-16 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
Title: Re: [OS-webwork] RC2? I’m all for it! -mike On 17/1/03 11:33 AM, "matt baldree" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words: Are we ready to push out another release candidate? I think it would be nice to get the recent performance patches out the door. -Matt

[OS-webwork] RC2?

2003-01-16 Thread matt baldree
Are we ready to push out another release candidate? I think it would be nice to get the recent performance patches out the door.   -Matt