05, 2004 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.4.1?
Jason,
How do you use ObjectFactory? There is a static setObjectFactory(),
but I do not see where it is called. Do I need to create a
ServletContextListener to create an instance of a derived class
Thanks Jason. I guess this will give us another option to consider.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason
Carreira
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.4.1
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.4.1?
Hm, what's the interest in this? I can add it to the core if there is
some demand for it (along with an example), as it stands it's an add on
that isn't checked in anywhere, but people are free to copy etc.
On Mar 3, 2004, at 2:20 PM, James Cook wrote
Zetterberg
- Original Message -
From: Hani Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.4.1?
Hm, what's the interest in this? I can add it to the core if there is
some demand for it (along with an example
Should we be expecting a point release soon with Hani's addition of a
SpringActionFactory?
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM.
]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 3:07 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.4.1
Scott, what features do you need in 1.4.1 that aren't in 1.4.0?
Dick and I have a number of things we'd like to see in 1.4.1, and not
many of those have been done yet. My side of things includes updating
jasper
Sorry if this is a basic, dumb question.
But how does one make a patch file to attach to a JIRA issue? Is this
documented somewhere?
- Original Message -
From: Hani Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork
question.
But how does one make a patch file to attach to a JIRA issue? Is this
documented somewhere?
- Original Message -
From: Hani Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.4.1
On Jan 20, 2004, at 9:17
It's in 1.4 only, although it might need to be pulled back out to
another jar, pending talks with Jason Pell to see how he feels about it
all.
On Jan 21, 2004, at 7:49 PM, Mark Woon wrote:
Hani Suleiman wrote:
On Jan 20, 2004, at 9:17 PM, Scott Farquhar wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at
Hani Suleiman wrote:
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.4.1
On Jan 20, 2004, at 9:17 PM, Scott Farquhar wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 09:07:34PM -0500, Hani
Suleiman wrote:
Scott, what features do you need in 1.4.1
that aren't in 1.4.0?
Mainly the Pell
Guys,
I'm looking to get webwork 1.4.1 fixed up (for selfish reasons - I want
to release a JIRA version using it).
I'm looking through the features, and most of them are issues that I'm
not too familiar with:
http://tinyurl.com/2x66a
I'll go through and work on any of them that I have a
Scott, what features do you need in 1.4.1 that aren't in 1.4.0?
Dick and I have a number of things we'd like to see in 1.4.1, and not
many of those have been done yet. My side of things includes updating
jasper and making sure it works on all containers, Dick wanted to add
string concatenation
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 09:07:34PM -0500, Hani Suleiman wrote:
Scott, what features do you need in 1.4.1 that aren't in 1.4.0?
Mainly the Pell fixes. On another note - did we eventually move the Pell
classes into Webwork? We'd need to maintain another module, as it is
LGPL?
Dick and I have
On Jan 20, 2004, at 9:17 PM, Scott Farquhar wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 09:07:34PM -0500, Hani Suleiman wrote:
Scott, what features do you need in 1.4.1 that aren't in 1.4.0?
Mainly the Pell fixes. On another note - did we eventually move the
Pell
classes into Webwork? We'd need to maintain
14 matches
Mail list logo
